+1 (binding) On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 5:07 AM Vakaris Baškirov < vakaris.bashki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 5:10 AM vin jake <jakevin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks Andy > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 9:27 PM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > There is a discussion [1] about moving the Ray SQL project [2] from the > > > `datafusion-contrib/ray-sql` GitHub repository into a new > > > `apache/datafusion-ray` repository. > > > > > > The new DataFusion Ray project will provide a Python-first distributed > > > version of DataFusion that can scale out on Ray clusters, providing a > > > lighter-weight alternative to the DataFusion Ballista project, which is > > no > > > longer actively maintained. > > > > > > The DataFusion Ray code base is ~1.7k lines of code, compared to ~27k > > lines > > > of code in Ballista, and has very similar performance for the TPC-H > > > benchmarks [3]. > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the > community > > > are encouraged to participate and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > The vote will run for at least seven days. > > > > > > [ ] +1 Accept donation of Ray SQL code base > > > [ ] +0 > > > [ ] -1 Do not accept donation of Ray SQL code base because... > > > > > > Here is my vote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/872 > > > [2] https://github.com/datafusion-contrib/ray-sql > > > [3] > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/872#issuecomment-2362554275 > > > > > >
