Re: [onlist is fine!] Re: [offlist] Re: SOAP over JMS and CXF.

2011-02-27 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi All I honestly don't understand why this thread hasn't died out yet. IMHO (after rereading for the 3 time) what was meant to be a subtle though a bit too over-elaborate remark involving the reference to the Russian Tsar and the not so healthy core and which I read as an attempt to protect the r

Re: Fwd: [offlist again and no, onlist is not fine!] Re: [onlist is fine!] Re: [offlist] Re: SOAP over JMS and CXF.

2011-02-26 Thread Christian Schneider
Hi Glen, I can understand that Jeff first sent you a private mail to tell you he disaproved the tone of your mail. I use the same practice at work. If I don“t like someones actions and it is a rather personal thing for me then I will not do it in front of the team. Instead I meet with him in pr

Fwd: [offlist again and no, onlist is not fine!] Re: [onlist is fine!] Re: [offlist] Re: SOAP over JMS and CXF.

2011-02-25 Thread Glen Mazza
then maybe you are going overboard. That's it! There's no reason to go off list. I just don't want to receive off-the-list emails from you. Period. Glen Original Message Subject: [offlist again and no, onlist is not fine!] Re: [onlist is fine!] Re: [offlis

[onlist is fine!] Re: [offlist] Re: SOAP over JMS and CXF.

2011-02-25 Thread Glen Mazza
You don't have to go off-list for this, Jeff. Besides my emails[1] aren't that bad, hardly trolling. There was no malice in what I had written (for I have a significant amount of respect for Bill), it was just meant as a playful kick back at Bill at 8:01am this morning at what I misperceived