You don't have to go off-list for this, Jeff. Besides my emails[1]
aren't that bad, hardly trolling. There was no malice in what I had
written (for I have a significant amount of respect for Bill), it was
just meant as a playful kick back at Bill at 8:01am this morning at what
I misperceived as a snarky dig at CXF (and as Bill later showed, he was
more than able to kick back in return). We all overstep slightly now
and then, this is the dev list.
Glen
[1]
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=user_nodes&user=148307
On 2/25/2011 11:51 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Glenn,
Whats up with the trolling on the lists? You have been rubbing folks the wrong
way and taking shots at people and its getting rather disheartening. Glenn, my
personal statement to you is a request to stop the pot shots as it makes this
project look ghetto. I'm CCing Dan since he is the PMC chair as I think he
needs to keep an eye on this.
Also, I recommend that you get yourself a gmail email address because taking
shots on the list with a talend.com address doesn't give your company good
credence as a representative.
Please chill out and breathe before pushing the send button. Feel free to hit
me up on IRC if you need to discuss.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Feb 25, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Glen Mazza wrote:
Bill, I'm all for plugging but if you could spend some time on fixing
the five (rather simple) RESTEasy bugs I reported (RESTEAST-494, 495,
496, 497, and 502) over a month ago, among the 109 you presently have
open and unresolved, that would also be good. As the Russian Czar
learned during WWI, it's not good to go too much on the offensive when
things are rotting out at home.
Glen
On 2/25/2011 8:47 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
That's great but what if your client isn't Java? Download a SOAP stack
and pray its compatible with CXF?
Simple HTTP calls are far superior, more lightweight, and easier to
code. Seriously, check out what we've done with the HornetQ REST
interface. Specifically the Javascript and Python examples. You'll see
that zero library downloads and minimal code is all that is required to
interface with a fully featured messaging API.
I'm sorry to plug our stuff here, but, I have to spread the word
whenever I see somebody interested in HTTP + messaging.
http://jboss.org/hornetq/rest
On 2/24/11 8:23 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
CXF JMS transport supports JMS URI which is part of JMS over SOAP spec
out of box. I think you can use it with JAXRS frontend without any
trouble.
2011/2/24, robert<rob...@gliesian.com>:
CXF supports SOAP over JMS; http://www.w3.org/TR/soapjms/.
Should the bindings and service extensions defined by this spec be
better suited in a supported WSDL or WADL?
I assume WADL as supported by CXF?
Thanks!
--
Glen Mazza
Software Engineer, Talend (http://www.talend.com)
blog: http://www.jroller.com/gmazza
--
Glen Mazza
Software Engineer, Talend (http://www.talend.com)
blog: http://www.jroller.com/gmazza
