Is a president-private@ mail forward out of the question? If the president
is part of the problem, then inform to send to board-private@ instead?
Niclas
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Joe Schaefer
> wrote:
> > Roman,
> > I've been be
Here's what I wrote to you on members@ Roman:
"""You're overlooking the archiving problem with president@ Roman.That we tell
people in the CoC that a report to that channel is availableto roughly 600
people unknown to them is needed if we are going tonot paper over the fact that
it's really not
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Here's what I wrote to you on members@ Roman:
>
> """
> You're overlooking the archiving problem with president@ Roman.
> That we tell people in the CoC that a report to that channel is available
> to roughly 600 people unknown to them is need
Here was your reply to me when I first pointed out the deficiencies with
president@. So much for the difficult to understand flowery prose, you keep
changing your stripes with each passing hour:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Joseph Schaefer wrote:
>
> Having a foundation wide CoC is great,
Here is what Shane said:"Emails to president@ (as far as I can tell) go to an
alias which
forwards to Ross (and EVP, and possibly someone else), as well as going
to an archived mailbox which I and others can access (not sure if it's
just a group of officers & board, or if this archive is Member ac
To a native English reader, Shane's commentary is perfectly aligned with
Marvin's patch. There are absolutely no gaps in direction despite your fierce
irrational opposition to having a pair of board members try to get something
meaningful accomplished for the foundation.
How about letting peopl
If you can find all the same detailed explanations that Shane has provided
in your paragraph simply saying "because I believe we still archive the
president@ alias" I'll buy you a beer.
Also, Joe, I'm sorry to say that -- but I do find your writing style *very*
difficult to follow when it comes to
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> To a native English reader, Shane's commentary is perfectly aligned with
> Marvin's patch.
Yes. Which is why I wrote: "Marvin, at this point what I'm about to
ask of you is
grossly unfair (since your proposal, apparently doesn't really make
a
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
>> I would prefer for President, EVP, directors to agree on a single email
>> alias that is an unarchived alias, with a published list of the specific
>> ASF Officers or Members that
