On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Here's what I wrote to you on members@ Roman: > > """ > You're overlooking the archiving problem with president@ Roman. > That we tell people in the CoC that a report to that channel is available > to roughly 600 people unknown to them is needed if we are going to > not paper over the fact that it's really not what a normal person would > consider "confidential" despite the language in the CoC. Much less the > additional hundred or so unknown people on a pmc list who would have > access to the report if it were made to private@pmc. > """ > > Hard to have an intelligent conversation with you Roman when only one of us > is paying attention to what the other has said.
It would be much easier to have an intelligent conversation with me, Joe, if your english prose was structured along the lines of what Shane wrote to me. I understand your desire for emphatic, floury language, but what you don't realize is that you make it very difficult to distill data points from your paragraph by employing that kind of language. Thanks, Roman.
