On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Shane Curcuru <a...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote:
>> I would prefer for President, EVP, directors to agree on a single email >> alias that is an unarchived alias, with a published list of the specific >> ASF Officers or Members that it goes to directly (names to be approved >> by President). > > That is exactly my preference as well. > > Marvin, at this point what I'm about to ask of you is grossly unfair (since > your proposal, apparently doesn't really make anything worse) but would > you consider the above statement by Shane to be your course of action? Sure. There are several approaches which I'd be fine with. Shane's approach above seems sound. Elsethread I see a preference stated for an officer of the ASF on the alias. I don't think that's necessary, so long as we have the President's designates. I'm anticipating that it will be the individuals who have already stepped forward on members@apache, though they have not yet explicitly granted permission to have their names published. I'll work up a new patch tomorrow when I'm a little more awake. Marvin Humphrey
