I can back up Roman if needed.
I didn't review ApacheCon talks for a couple of years or so and I don't
remember the logistics part. How can we get a list of the proposed talks?
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 02/11/2015 01:26 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
I can volunteer. What do I need to do? ;-)
Thanks
I can volunteer. What do I need to do? ;-)
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Anyone want to volunteer to chair the Community track at ApacheCon?
> Basically, this means taking charge of reviewing the Community talks that
> have been submitted, and selecting the
Hey Rich. As ever just point at me and say "Ross, I need you to do "
and I'll do everything I can to deliver (I trust you to be kind ;-). Use me
to backfill wherever you want (thinking specifically about the Panel
proposal)
Similarly feel free to kill any of my existing sessions to make room f
On 02/14/2014 06:03 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
On 14 Feb 2014, at 14:39 pm, Rich Bowen wrote:
On 02/13/2014 06:28 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:26 AM, jan i wrote:
Especially for the community track a panel discussion, with a short
introduction from each panel memb
On 02/14/2014 09:17 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On 02/13/2014 06:28 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:26 AM, jan i wrote:
Especially for the community track a panel discussion, with a short
introduction from each panel member could be a lot more lively and
thereby
giving for
Sure. I will.
On Feb 14, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On 02/13/2014 06:28 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:26 AM, jan i wrote:
>>> Especially for the community track a panel discussion, with a short
>>> introduction from each panel member could be a lot more
On 02/14/2014 09:22 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On 02/14/2014 08:17 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
So, a bunch of cool suggestions in this thread. I'm reluctant to
schedule a panel session without volunteers. Are any of you volunteering
to be the moderator and/or the speakers? We'd need at least three
spe
On 02/14/2014 08:17 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> So, a bunch of cool suggestions in this thread. I'm reluctant to
> schedule a panel session without volunteers. Are any of you volunteering
> to be the moderator and/or the speakers? We'd need at least three
> speakers, plus a moderator, to make a worthwh
On 02/13/2014 06:28 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:26 AM, jan i wrote:
Especially for the community track a panel discussion, with a short
introduction from each panel member could be a lot more lively and thereby
giving for us all.
The community track is all about our
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014, at 07:47 AM, jan i wrote:
> Take the ongoing discussion about release timing, that will for sure call
> for debate.
More generally, a discussion about Apache adapting to new release
methodologies and technologies, but yeah - I'd like to see some
discussion on this.
> Anoth
On 14 Feb 2014, at 14:39 pm, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On 02/13/2014 06:28 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:26 AM, jan i wrote:
>>> Especially for the community track a panel discussion, with a short
>>> introduction from each panel member could be a lot more lively and thereby
On 14 February 2014 14:39, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On 02/13/2014 06:28 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:26 AM, jan i wrote:
>>
>>> Especially for the community track a panel discussion, with a short
>>> introduction from each panel member could be a lot more lively and
>
On 02/13/2014 06:28 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:26 AM, jan i wrote:
Especially for the community track a panel discussion, with a short
introduction from each panel member could be a lot more lively and thereby
giving for us all.
The community track is all about our
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:26 AM, jan i wrote:
> Especially for the community track a panel discussion, with a short
> introduction from each panel member could be a lot more lively and thereby
> giving for us all.
>
> The community track is all about our communities, so why not do some of the
> t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/02/14 19:25, David Nalley wrote:
> There are 4 incubator related talks marked as accept - we could
> surely pare one of those down.
I was thinking in the same line. So +1 for rejecting one of those.
- --
Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regard
On 02/13/2014 01:24 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
Please have a look at http://tm3.org/cfpreview Community tab.
We currently have 19 talks that have been marked as 'Accept' in the CFP
system, and I would like to fit this content into 18 sessio
On 13 February 2014 19:10, Rich Bowen wrote:
> All,
>
> Please have a look at http://tm3.org/cfpreview Community tab.
>
> We currently have 19 talks that have been marked as 'Accept' in the CFP
> system, and I would like to fit this content into 18 sessions. I'd like
> some feedback on what talk
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> All,
>
> Please have a look at http://tm3.org/cfpreview Community tab.
>
> We currently have 19 talks that have been marked as 'Accept' in the CFP
> system, and I would like to fit this content into 18 sessions. I'd like some
> feedback on what
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Please have a look at http://tm3.org/cfpreview Community tab.
>
> We currently have 19 talks that have been marked as 'Accept' in the CFP
> system, and I would like to fit this content into 18 sessions.
My Incubator talk is listed in two trac
19 matches
Mail list logo
