On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > All, > > Please have a look at http://tm3.org/cfpreview Community tab. > > We currently have 19 talks that have been marked as 'Accept' in the CFP > system, and I would like to fit this content into 18 sessions. I'd like some > feedback on what talk we should drop. There's a lot of overlap in many of > the sessions proposed, and I expect that there are a number that could be > considered redundant. We'll also need a fallback talk for this track, so if > a particular speaker has several sessions, perhaps we can move one to > fallback designation. > > Shane, Ross, and Nick each have multiple talks marked accepted, but, in each > case, there are a number of "Strongly Accept" votes, and I need to hear from > a larger group on where we should go with this. > > Perhaps we could put the three of them in a cage and let them fight it out. > Or, worse, on a panel session. > > --Rich > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon >
There are 4 incubator related talks marked as accept - we could surely pare one of those down. Also Shane has three talks accepted, and has previously requested (admittedly OOB) that we accept no more than 2 of his talks. --David
