On 13 February 2014 19:10, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > All, > > Please have a look at http://tm3.org/cfpreview Community tab. > > We currently have 19 talks that have been marked as 'Accept' in the CFP > system, and I would like to fit this content into 18 sessions. I'd like > some feedback on what talk we should drop. There's a lot of overlap in many > of the sessions proposed, and I expect that there are a number that could > be considered redundant. We'll also need a fallback talk for this track, so > if a particular speaker has several sessions, perhaps we can move one to > fallback designation. > > Shane, Ross, and Nick each have multiple talks marked accepted, but, in > each case, there are a number of "Strongly Accept" votes, and I need to > hear from a larger group on where we should go with this. > > Perhaps we could put the three of them in a cage and let them fight it > out. Or, worse, on a panel session. >
Especially for the community track a panel discussion, with a short introduction from each panel member could be a lot more lively and thereby giving for us all. The community track is all about our communities, so why not do some of the talks in that form. but thats just my personal opinion. rgds jan I. > --Rich > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon > >
