Re: New Committer Orientation

t, in general, what Ross > said. :) > > Speaking of which, FOSDEM, Jan 30-Feb 4. Come have a beer with me. :) > > > --Rich > > > On 01/15/2014 03:03 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >> >> party@? >> >> On 13 January 2014 20:40, Rich Bowen wrote: >>> >>&g

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 13 January 2014 20:40, Rich Bowen wrote: Do we have a New Committer Orientation page somewhere? I ask because I just mentioned the party@ list to someone and they had never heard of it, despite being around the Foundation for a long time. Clearly, we're falling down on the job if people don&#x

Re: New Committer Orientation

r Technology Evangelist >> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. >> A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation >> >> >> >> >> >> On 15 January 2014 12:03, Noah Slater wrote: >> >>> party@? >>> >>> On 13 January 2014 20:40, Rich

Re: New Committer Orientation

t;> >> On 13 January 2014 20:40, Rich Bowen wrote: >> > Do we have a New Committer Orientation page somewhere? I ask because I >> just >> > mentioned the party@ list to someone and they had never heard of it, >> despite >> > being around the

Re: New Committer Orientation

Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation On 15 January 2014 12:03, Noah Slater wrote: > party@? > > On 13 January 2014 20:40, Rich Bowen wrote: > > Do we have a New Committer Orientation page somewhere? I ask because I > just > > mentioned

Re: New Committer Orientation

wrote: > Do we have a New Committer Orientation page somewhere? I ask because I > just mentioned the party@ list to someone and they had never heard of it, > despite being around the Foundation for a long time. Clearly, we're falling > down on the job if people don't know

Re: New Committer Orientation

party@? On 13 January 2014 20:40, Rich Bowen wrote: > Do we have a New Committer Orientation page somewhere? I ask because I just > mentioned the party@ list to someone and they had never heard of it, despite > being around the Foundation for a long time. Clearly, we're falling dow

RE: New Committer Orientation

- From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 07:58 To: dev Subject: Re: New Committer Orientation Hi, On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:38 PM, jan i wrote: > ...seems to be an insider ML, is does not accept > subscribe-play@play-subscribe and i

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 01/14/2014 04:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:38 PM, jan i wrote: >> ...seems to be an insider ML, is does not accept >> subscribe-play@play-subscribe and its not listed in >> https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe... > > I do see "party" in the s

Re: New Committer Orientation

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > ...Whimsy just doesn't offer committers the > ability to subscribe to lists through it just yet (There's a big TODO in > the source code). I'll ask Sam if/when this can be addressed... For now, a mention of this limitation at https://whimsy.a

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 14 January 2014 17:19, Rich Bowen wrote: > That should be party-subscribe not subscribe-party. > thx, I finally got a confirmation, replied to the confirmation and are now waiting for the "welcome" mail. I assume that waits in some moderator queue. rgds jan I. > > --Rich > > > On 01/14/201

Re: New Committer Orientation

That should be party-subscribe not subscribe-party. --Rich On 01/14/2014 10:40 AM, jan i wrote: Meant of course "party" not "play" sorry for the confusion. rgds jan I. On 14 January 2014 16:38, jan i wrote: On 14 January 2014 16:18, Rich Bowen wrote: On 01/14/2014 04:25 AM, jan i wr

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 01/14/2014 10:57 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:38 PM, jan i wrote: ...seems to be an insider ML, is does not accept subscribe-play@play-subscribe and its not listed in https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe... I do see "party" in the subscribe option

Re: New Committer Orientation

Hi, On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:38 PM, jan i wrote: > ...seems to be an insider ML, is does not accept > subscribe-play@play-subscribe and its not listed in > https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe... I do see "party" in the subscribe options at https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscri

Re: New Committer Orientation

Meant of course "party" not "play" sorry for the confusion. rgds jan I. On 14 January 2014 16:38, jan i wrote: > > > > On 14 January 2014 16:18, Rich Bowen wrote: > >> >> On 01/14/2014 04:25 AM, jan i wrote: >> >>> On 14 January 2014 09:50, Issac Goldstand wrote: >>> >>> FWIW, I don't know

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 14 January 2014 16:18, Rich Bowen wrote: > > On 01/14/2014 04:25 AM, jan i wrote: > >> On 14 January 2014 09:50, Issac Goldstand wrote: >> >> FWIW, I don't know about party@, so sorry, Rich :-) >>> >>> Could someone please spend a few words what party@ covers, I too did >> not >> know about

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 01/14/2014 04:25 AM, jan i wrote: On 14 January 2014 09:50, Issac Goldstand wrote: FWIW, I don't know about party@, so sorry, Rich :-) Could someone please spend a few words what party@ covers, I too did not know about it. The word implies a lot, but I am not sure my idea is correct It

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 01/14/2014 02:15 AM, Lefty Leverenz wrote: Why isn't party@ included in the archives under the ASF-wide lists section? I don't believe it's publicly archived, because it tends to contain things like travel plans, phone numbers, and so on, that we

Re: New Committer Orientation

Hi, On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:25 AM, jan i wrote: > ...Could someone please spend a few words what party@ covers, I too did not > know about it. The word implies a lot, but I am not sure my idea is correct... As per http://incubator.apache.org/guides/committer.html it's "where people plan how t

Re: New Committer Orientation

13/01/2014 21:43, Rich Bowen wrote: > > Do we have a page somewhere for New Committer Orientation? I ask because > > I just mentioned the party@ list to someone and got a virtual blank > > stare. We're clearly falling down on the job if folks don't know about > > party@ !! > > > > --Rich > > > >

Re: New Committer Orientation

FWIW, I don't know about party@, so sorry, Rich :-) On 13/01/2014 21:43, Rich Bowen wrote: > Do we have a page somewhere for New Committer Orientation? I ask because > I just mentioned the party@ list to someone and got a virtual blank > stare. We're clearly falling down on the

Re: New Committer Orientation

d below the first screenful of lists. -- Lefty On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > Do we have a page somewhere for New Committer Orientation? I ask because > I > > just mentioned the party@ list

Re: New Committer Orientation

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > Do we have a page somewhere for New Committer Orientation? I ask because I > just mentioned the party@ list to someone and got a virtual blank stare Not one page...*three* (sigh) : http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.htm

New Committer Orientation

Do we have a New Committer Orientation page somewhere? I ask because I just mentioned the party@ list to someone and they had never heard of it, despite being around the Foundation for a long time. Clearly, we're falling down on the job if people don't know about the party@ list!

New Committer Orientation

Do we have a page somewhere for New Committer Orientation? I ask because I just mentioned the party@ list to someone and got a virtual blank stare. We're clearly falling down on the job if folks don't know about party@ !! --Rich -- Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com http://rcbowen.com/