That should be party-subscribe not subscribe-party.
--Rich
On 01/14/2014 10:40 AM, jan i wrote:
Meant of course "party" not "play" sorry for the confusion.
rgds
jan I.
On 14 January 2014 16:38, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote:
On 14 January 2014 16:18, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
On 01/14/2014 04:25 AM, jan i wrote:
On 14 January 2014 09:50, Issac Goldstand <mar...@beamartyr.net> wrote:
FWIW, I don't know about party@, so sorry, Rich :-)
Could someone please spend a few words what party@ covers, I too did
not
know about it. The word implies a lot, but I am not sure my idea is
correct
It's the list where I post:
Hey, I'm going to be at FOSDEM. If you're going to be there, ping me, and
let's have a beer.
seems to be an insider ML, is does not accept subscribe-play@play-subscribe and
its not listed in
https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe
but apart from that a good thing.
Btw. I will be at FOSDEM giving a 2 short presentations and are positive
towards meeting other apache fellows over a glass of wine.
rgds
jan I.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
http://rcbowen.com/
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
http://rcbowen.com/
