Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

I'm accumulating these requests, and will make a schedule shuffle tomorrow, and again the next day, and so on. Trying not to overwhelm Craig with changes. Thanks. --Rich On 02/25/2015 05:47 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: Sergey Beryozkin asked me if it would be possible to swap his talk on Wed

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

Sergey Beryozkin asked me if it would be possible to swap his talk on Wed morning at 10am with Aki's talk at 9am. He needs to fly back home (internationally) the same day. Thanks, Hadrian On 02/25/2015 08:01 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: Here is the schedule link - http://events.linuxfoundation.or

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

Aha! Makes sense. Thanks you! On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > Yes, I see that the schedule is now live on the Apachecon.com site, so no > more need to pass the spreadsheet around. Thank you all so much for your > assistance in this process. > > --Rich > > > On 02/25/2015 08:0

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

Thanks Suresh On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: > Here is the schedule link - > http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america/program/schedule > > > or the direct sched li

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

Yes, I see that the schedule is now live on the Apachecon.com site, so no more need to pass the spreadsheet around. Thank you all so much for your assistance in this process. --Rich On 02/25/2015 08:01 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: Here is the schedule link - http://events.linuxfoundation.org/even

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

Here is the schedule link - http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america/program/schedule or the direct sched link - http://apacheconna2015.sched.org Sur

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

I thought the spreadsheet was now "dead" and we use the LF scheduler ? rgds jan i On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Ditto here ;-) > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Alexander Bezzubov > wrote: > > Hi Rich, > > > > may I request an access to the schedule spreadsheet

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

Ditto here ;-) On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: > Hi Rich, > > may I request an access to the schedule spreadsheet please? > > Thanks in advance. > > -- > BR, > Alexander > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > >> HI Rich, >> >> Could I request acc

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

Hi Rich, may I request an access to the schedule spreadsheet please? Thanks in advance. -- BR, Alexander On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > HI Rich, > > Could I request access to the schedule spreadsheet please? > > Thanks, > > > - Henry > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:48 A

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

HI Rich, Could I request access to the schedule spreadsheet please? Thanks, - Henry On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1k6Fbr7ijMs2PJunN9lhsjq7NjnSXRCVXTJHAHRqWshc/edit?usp=sharing > > This is read-only because it's not the authoritativ

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

On Feb 24, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > On 02/24/2015 03:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Just a quick FYI: It looks like the acceptance emails are >> going out but it does not mention which talk(s) was >> accepted. Kinda hard if you've submitted several talks. :) I have the same question

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

the dark. Making the schedule public too > early caused significant logistical problems last two times (people > thinking they knew things that they didn't know, and making travel plans > accordingly), and we want to avoid that nightmare this time around. > > For those involved in t

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

On 02/24/2015 03:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Just a quick FYI: It looks like the acceptance emails are going out but it does not mention which talk(s) was accepted. Kinda hard if you've submitted several talks. :) Which leads to a very important question: What was the reply-to set to on tha

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

Just a quick FYI: It looks like the acceptance emails are going out but it does not mention which talk(s) was accepted. Kinda hard if you've submitted several talks. :)

RE: ApacheCon Schedule

what little of his free time trying to not be outsmarted by his Shetland sheepdog while watching British panel quiz shows. -Original Message- From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 12:51 PM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: RE: ApacheCon Schedule I can

Re: ApacheCon Schedule - Integration

Thanks Rich, #237 is a 7th talk (sort of a waiting list for precisely the reason you mention). We can go further down the list, my list was longer than that. Cheers, Hadrian On 02/20/2015 04:14 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: On 02/19/2015 01:55 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: #85 #145 #201 #188 #58

Re: ApacheCon Schedule - Integration

On 02/19/2015 01:55 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: #85 #145 #201 #188 #58 #155 #237 - speaker has another accepted talk Ok, I've scheduled these. Could be that we'll just not fill a few slots when people decline their acceptance, and we'll be fine. -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbow

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

rack if Joe wants it (not in CFP). So there is space for a 6 session track from Hadrian. Sent from my Windows Phone From: jan i<mailto:j...@apache.org> Sent: ‎2/‎19/‎2015 7:59 AM To: dev@community.apache.org<mailto:dev@community.apache.org> Subjec

RE: ApacheCon Schedule

ent: Friday, February 20, 2015 12:45 PM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: ApacheCon Schedule So, do I understand that we're scheduling a TEALS talk in the 4pm slot on Monday, and you will provide a title and abstract soonish? I'm putting that in the grid now. LF says they'll

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

9/2015 03:54 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: Yep, I'll get it ASAP and share here. Ross -Original Message- From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 3:48 PM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: ApacheCon Schedule On Thu, Feb 19, 201

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, jan i wrote: If we still have that community slot, and/or one appears with at least 2 weeks notice... Ross has promised to fill it with a talk not in CFP. Great if so! Currently, we have a "traditional" Apache Way talk in the schedule. There has been some debate about t

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

On 20 February 2015 at 17:14, Nick Burch wrote: > On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Rich Bowen wrote: > >> * We have an empty spot in the community track. Given that community is >> what we *do*, it seems that we could come up with 6 community talks to >> schedule, and have a few fallbacks. If folks could loo

RE: ApacheCon Schedule

<mailto:dev@community.apache.org> Subject: Re: ApacheCon Schedule On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Rich Bowen wrote: > * We have an empty spot in the community track. Given that community is > what we *do*, it seems that we could come up with 6 community talks to > schedule, and have a few fallbacks. If folks co

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Rich Bowen wrote: * We have an empty spot in the community track. Given that community is what we *do*, it seems that we could come up with 6 community talks to schedule, and have a few fallbacks. If folks could look through the not-yet-accepted list with me and see what yo

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

for a 6 session track from Hadrian. >> >> Sent from my Windows Phone >> ____ >> From: jan i<mailto:j...@apache.org> >> Sent: ‎2/‎19/‎2015 7:59 AM >> To: dev@community.apache.org<mailto:dev@community.apache.org> >> Subjec

RE: ApacheCon Schedule

Yep, I'll get it ASAP and share here. Ross -Original Message- From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 3:48 PM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: ApacheCon Schedule On Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at 08:12 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at 08:12 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > I can fill that community track with the TEALS session that we previously > discussed. I owe details of that to Joe as track chair, I'll send under > separate cover shortly. If we don't want that one there are a couple I > can

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

7:59 AM To: dev@community.apache.org<mailto:dev@community.apache.org> Subject: Re: ApacheCon Schedule On 19 February 2015 at 16:49, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: Traditionally we had an integration track at ApacheCon. I volunteered to run it this year, but there was virtually no answer from

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

> > Sent: ‎2/‎19/‎2015 7:59 AM > To: dev@community.apache.org<mailto:dev@community.apache.org> > Subject: Re: ApacheCon Schedule > > On 19 February 2015 at 16:49, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > > Traditionally we had an integration track at ApacheCon. I volunteered to

RE: ApacheCon Schedule

o: dev@community.apache.org<mailto:dev@community.apache.org> Subject: Re: ApacheCon Schedule On 19 February 2015 at 16:49, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Traditionally we had an integration track at ApacheCon. I volunteered to > run it this year, but there was virtually no answer from the PMCs. > I s

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

> before we ask them to consider running (I believe that time has now passed > and will make this suggestion in Austin when we debrief. > > Rss > > -Original Message- > From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 7:29 AM > To: dev@community.

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

k. Making the schedule public too early >>> caused >>> significant logistical problems last two times (people thinking they knew >>> things that they didn't know, and making travel plans accordingly), and >>> we >>> want to avoid that nightmare this time

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

s last two times (people thinking they knew things that they didn't know, and making travel plans accordingly), and we want to avoid that nightmare this time around. For those involved in the process so far: It looks like we're done with the ApacheCon schedule. Sort of. We've got 7 tr

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

early caused significant logistical problems last two times (people thinking they knew things that they didn't know, and making travel plans accordingly), and we want to avoid that nightmare this time around. For those involved in the process so far: It looks like we're done with the Apa

RE: ApacheCon Schedule

ur travels) Ross -Original Message- From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 7:37 AM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: ApacheCon Schedule On 02/19/2015 09:12 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > I can fill that community track w

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

y wasn't my talk selected" you can expect one from me ;-) Looks like all your talks are in the Cloud area. I'd talk to the Cloud track chair if I were you. ;-) Ross -Original Message- From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 6:0

RE: ApacheCon Schedule

e that time has now passed and will make this suggestion in Austin when we debrief. Rss -Original Message- From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 7:29 AM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: ApacheCon Schedule On 19 February 2015 at 15:05, Rich

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

e want to avoid that nightmare this time around. For those involved in the process so far: It looks like we're done with the ApacheCon schedule. Sort of. We've got 7 tracks, three days, which I think is probably just the right volume. Please look at the DRAFT schedule, and comment i

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

ule public too early caused significant logistical problems last two times (people thinking they knew things that they didn't know, and making travel plans accordingly), and we want to avoid that nightmare this time around. For those involved in the process so far: It look

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

gs that they didn't know, and making travel plans accordingly), and we > want to avoid that nightmare this time around. > > For those involved in the process so far: > > It looks like we're done with the ApacheCon schedule. Sort of. We've got 7 > tracks, three d

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

last two times (people thinking they knew things that they didn't know, and making travel plans accordingly), and we want to avoid that nightmare this time around. For those involved in the process so far: It looks like we're done with the ApacheCon schedule. Sort of. We've got

Re: ApacheCon Schedule

avel plans accordingly), and we > want to avoid that nightmare this time around. > > For those involved in the process so far: > > It looks like we're done with the ApacheCon schedule. Sort of. We've got 7 > tracks, three days, which I think is probably just the right vo

RE: ApacheCon Schedule

.@rcbowen.com] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 6:06 AM To: dev Subject: ApacheCon Schedule For those not involved in the process so far, I appreciate your patience, and your suffering in the dark. Making the schedule public too early caused significant logistical problems last two times (people t

ApacheCon Schedule

ingly), and we want to avoid that nightmare this time around. For those involved in the process so far: It looks like we're done with the ApacheCon schedule. Sort of. We've got 7 tracks, three days, which I think is probably just the right volume. Please look at the DRAFT schedule, and

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

On 18 February 2015 at 18:26, Joe Witt wrote: > Rich > > Understood. In the context of the stated objective for an incubator track > my objective view is that those talks center on the incubating project. > Thanks, I am right now puzzling with the incubator track and lets see what we can come up

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

Rich Understood. In the context of the stated objective for an incubator track my objective view is that those talks center on the incubating project. I dont have access to the other proposal. In the context of the community at large when there are projects that serve similar problem domains th

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

On 02/18/2015 11:35 AM, Joe Witt wrote: As an FYI there was a proposal I submitted which was about apache nifi (incubating) (Apache NiFi: better analytics demands better dataflow). That would be more in the spirit of a pure incubator track than #91 which appears (from the title) to combine som

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

As an FYI there was a proposal I submitted which was about apache nifi (incubating) (Apache NiFi: better analytics demands better dataflow). That would be more in the spirit of a pure incubator track than #91 which appears (from the title) to combine some information about a TLP with an incubating

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

HI. The content of Incubator project track is: #87, Introduction to Zeppelin #91, Integrating Event Streams and File Data with Apache Flume and Apache NiFi #112, Pulsar: Realtime Analytics at Scale leveraging Kafka, Hadoop and Kylin #183, Apache MRQL (incubating): Advanced Query Processing for Co

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

Hi I have added a "incubator projects" track for 1 day (6 talks). I would prefer a marketing name like "new and exciting projects", but I do feel it is important to give these projects a chance to do marketing for their projects. Rgds jan I. On 18 February 2015 at 09:32, Sharan Foga wrote: >

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

Hi Rich Please can I have access to the spreadsheet. Thanks Sharan On 17.2.2015 18:55, Rich Bowen wrote: On 02/17/2015 12:48 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1k6Fbr7ijMs2PJunN9lhsjq7NjnSXRCVXTJHAHRqWshc/edit?usp=sharing This is read-only because it's not the

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

On 02/17/2015 12:48 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1k6Fbr7ijMs2PJunN9lhsjq7NjnSXRCVXTJHAHRqWshc/edit?usp=sharing This is read-only because it's not the authoritative source, but is a copy. There's some overlap between Content and Science. There's also some overla

ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1k6Fbr7ijMs2PJunN9lhsjq7NjnSXRCVXTJHAHRqWshc/edit?usp=sharing This is read-only because it's not the authoritative source, but is a copy. There's some overlap between Content and Science. There's also some overlap in the Community track. Please send comm

Re: ApacheCon Schedule announced: Help still needed

Hi, On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > ...* Identify talks that are in a sub-optimal order... I have 3 talks back-to-back on Nov.18 starting at 14h40. There's a break between the first two so those would work, but no break between second and third talk. if one of those can be m

Re: ApacheCon Schedule announced: Help still needed

"The" would be a noun in that sentence and not an article. While I'd prefer standard capitalization, I think the most important thing is consistent capitalization rules for all talks. Let's pick a style and use it for all of them. On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Lefty Leverenz wrote: > Rules v

Re: ApacheCon Schedule announced: Help still needed

HI, > * Identify speakers that are speaking twice at once, or back-to-back I have two talks back to back on the same day (Monday 350 + 4:50) but I'm good with that. Thanks, Justin

Re: ApacheCon Schedule announced: Help still needed

Rules vary, but if you're capitalizing more than the first word then the last word should be capitalized too, even if it's not usually capitalized. For example: "A Discussion of When to Capitalize the Word The." Here's a handy converter: http://titlecapitalization.com/. And here's a short expl

Re: ApacheCon Schedule announced: Help still needed

On 25.07.2014 14:44, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > Inconsistent capitalization. I'd recommend changing titles to standard > capitalization rules. +1 to that. I had "fun" noticing that session titles that were already correctly capitalized in the submissions got mangled in the schedule. -- Brane

Re: ApacheCon Schedule announced: Help still needed

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > * Read talk titles and abstracts - send me edits for grammar, clarity, > spelling, whatever. Point out boring titles. I started to go through and send you the full list of changes, but then realized it'd be faster for you to make the changes d

ApacheCon Schedule announced: Help still needed

We're delighted to announce the schedule for ApacheCon Europe 2014 http://t.co/yVMgqGW80L There are still several ways that you can you can help. Examine the parts of the schedule you care about and: * Identify talks that are in a sub-optimal order * Identify speakers that are speaking twice

ApacheCon schedule selection, almost ...

As you may know, we were supposed to send out speaker notifications for ApacheCon today. This isn't going to happen, but we're nearly there. We should have talk selections by tomorrow. An actual schedule (shuffling what days get what tracks, eliminating places where someone speaks twice at once

Re: ApacheCon schedule status

Thanks. fixed On 02/14/2014 08:11 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: I've got a mostly-done tentative schedule, and I need lots of people to look at it. Seems Roman Shaposhnik is scheduled to

Re: ApacheCon schedule status

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: >> I've got a mostly-done tentative schedule, and I need lots of people to look >> at it. Seems Roman Shaposhnik is scheduled to present two talks simultaneously on Day 1. (Google-in-a-b

Re: ApacheCon schedule status

On 02/14/2014 04:42 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: I have an issue with the following single slot. Mr. Renato Marroquin has been unsuccessful in obtaining travel assistance. Currently he is assigned slot H6 on the grid. His proposed presentation is 'Turning NoSQl data in Graphs'. It *may* be the case

Re: ApacheCon schedule status

On 02/14/2014 04:39 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: Hi Rich, Going by this schedule On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: http://tm3.org/actracks is the proposed schedule I have an issue with the following single slot. Mr. Renato Marroquin has been unsuccessful in obtaining t

Re: ApacheCon schedule status

Hi Rich, Going by this schedule On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > http://tm3.org/actracks is the proposed schedule > > I have an issue with the following single slot. Mr. Renato Marroquin has been unsuccessful in obtaining travel assistance. Currently he is assigned slot H6 on

Re: ApacheCon schedule status

Thank you all for your extremely helpful feedback so far. I would very much like to put this to bed by close of business today so that we can, as promised, send out speaker notifications on Monday. If anyone has any contacts in the CXF community, please yell at them and tell them that I need t

Re: ApacheCon schedule status

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014, at 08:11 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > I was actually specifically trying to group similar content so that > people could plan their day in blocks. However, I'd be glad to make any > changes that your segment of the community things we should make. What > do the other cloud/cloud

Re: ApacheCon schedule status

On 02/14/2014 06:50 AM, Tomaz Muraus wrote: Rich, I noticed that there are two Libcloud talks scheduled one after another on Day 1 in the Cloudy track. First one is by Sebastien and the other one is by me. Those talks are quite different (Sebastien will talk about the library usage, etc. and I

Re: ApacheCon schedule status

Rich, I noticed that there are two Libcloud talks scheduled one after another on Day 1 in the Cloudy track. First one is by Sebastien and the other one is by me. Those talks are quite different (Sebastien will talk about the library usage, etc. and I will talk more about the community and project

Re: ApacheCon schedule status

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > I've got a mostly-done tentative schedule, and I need lots of people to look > at it. Looks like my Incubator talk is scheduled to be given on both Day 1 and Day 3. Yes, it will be so awesome that attendees will demand an encore. Marvin Humph

ApacheCon schedule status

I've got a mostly-done tentative schedule, and I need lots of people to look at it. http://tm3.org/cfpreview is all of the talks, broken into categories http://tm3.org/actracks is the proposed schedule I'm waiting for feedback from the Hadoop/Bigdata folks, and from the Science folks, so those