On 18 February 2015 at 18:26, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rich > > Understood. In the context of the stated objective for an incubator track > my objective view is that those talks center on the incubating project. > Thanks, I am right now puzzling with the incubator track and lets see what we can come up with.
The purpose of that track is to give incubator projects a chance to promote themself, get more people aboard, and less about the technology (at least that is the hope). > > I dont have access to the other proposal. > > In the context of the community at large when there are projects that serve > similar problem domains there is definitely value in that discussion. I'd > love to see a few lightning chats for instance followed by discussion of > true overlap, differing solutions, and how they can compliment. > That would be a real good idea for the Barcamp, where we might have more time for discussions. > > Either way appreciate this is a lot of work to coordinate and tough calls > have to be made. We are new and want to get the word and message out. If > not this round we will try next time > no no think like this.....we would like both this time and next time (ACEU is the next thing), it is your project and a candicate to be the next big thing. rgds jan i. > > Thanks > Joe > On Feb 18, 2015 11:59 AM, "Rich Bowen" <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > > On 02/18/2015 11:35 AM, Joe Witt wrote: > > > As an FYI there was a proposal I submitted which was about apache nifi > > (incubating) (Apache NiFi: better analytics demands better dataflow). > > That would be more in the spirit of a pure incubator track than #91 > > which appears (from the title) to combine some information about a TLP > > with an incubating project. > > > > ok, put on your most objective possible mind, and look at the two talks, > and tell me whether we should run one or the other, or both, in your > opinion of what's best for the project and the event. Yeah, I know that's a > hard call when you're one of the submitters. The question here is whether > the talks are different enough that running both of them woulnd't be a > problem. OR, if you can work with the other presenter to make the talks > complement one another. > > > > > > Thanks > > Joe > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> HI. > >> > >> The content of Incubator project track is: > >> > >> #87, Introduction to Zeppelin > >> #91, Integrating Event Streams and File Data with Apache Flume and > Apache > >> NiFi > >> #112, Pulsar: Realtime Analytics at Scale leveraging Kafka, Hadoop and > >> Kylin > >> #183, Apache MRQL (incubating): Advanced Query Processing for Complex, > >> Large-Scale Data Analysis > >> #208, Introducing Apache HTrace: an end-to-end tracing framework for > >> distributed systems > >> #217, Apache Lens: Cut Data Analytics Silos in your Enterprise > >> (WAIT-LISTED) > >> #224, Apache Kylin - Extreme OLAP engine for Hadoop > >> > >> #83, Apache Incubator: where it is coming from and where it is going > >> Would have been an excellent introduction talk, but it is scheduled for > >> "community". > >> > >> If we schedule #83, for "incubator projects", #91 goes to WAIT-LISTED: > >> > >> rgds > >> jan i. > >> > >> On 18 February 2015 at 15:47, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi > >>> > >>> I have added a "incubator projects" track for 1 day (6 talks). I would > >>> prefer a marketing name like "new and exciting projects", but I do feel > >>> it > >>> is important to give these projects a chance to do marketing for their > >>> projects. > >>> > >>> Rgds > >>> jan I. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 18 February 2015 at 09:32, Sharan Foga <sharan.f...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Rich > >>>> > >>>> Please can I have access to the spreadsheet. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Sharan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 17.2.2015 18:55, Rich Bowen wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 02/17/2015 12:48 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1k6Fbr7ijMs2PJunN9lhsjq7NjnSXR > >>>>>> CVXTJHAHRqWshc/edit?usp=sharing > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This is read-only because it's not the authoritative source, but is > a > >>>>>> copy. There's some overlap between Content and Science. There's also > >>>>>> some overlap in the Community track. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please send comments here. Note that we're supposed to notify > speakers > >>>>>> yesterday. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> I'm sorry, that was a mistake. I shouldn't share it publicly like > that. > >>>>> Please let me know if you need to see this spreadsheet, and I'll add > >>>>> your > >>>>> name to the invite list. Making it public just caused too many > problems > >>>>> last time. > >>>>> > >>>>> --Rich > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon >
