Hi Hadrian
Am .04.2017, 06:05 Uhr, schrieb Hadrian Zbarcea :
On 04/20/2017 11:06 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Raphael Bircher
wrote:
Hi Ted
Am .04.2017, 06:14 Uhr, schrieb Ted Dunning :
Raphael,
Why don't you get some folks together and start a company t
Am .04.2017, 06:30 Uhr, schrieb Dave Fisher :
Hadrian / Raphael,
I will be at Apachecon Miami and open for any opportunity. Will either
of you be there?
Unfortunately I'm not. But how about meeting on a chat, videochat?
Regards Raphael
--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
---
Hadrian / Raphael,
I will be at Apachecon Miami and open for any opportunity. Will either of you
be there?
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:05 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 04/20/2017 11:06 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Ra
Hi Ted
Am .04.2017, 00:35 Uhr, schrieb Ted Dunning :
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Raphael Bircher
wrote:
The challenge that is unique to OpenOffice as you are well aware is
the fact that
it is both a product and a project.
It's a bit provocative. What would happened if we drop the
On 04/20/2017 11:06 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Raphael Bircher
wrote:
Hi Ted
Am .04.2017, 06:14 Uhr, schrieb Ted Dunning :
Raphael,
Why don't you get some folks together and start a company that solicits
donations to support OO development and QA work?
On 20 April 2017 at 20:02, Mark Struberg wrote:
> This has not bean dealt with that way for many projects historically.
> E.g. not all maven plugins are served via dist, but via repository.a.o.
The ASF mission is to release open *source* to the public.
It is a requirement that the full source nee
On 4/20/17, 10:14 AM, "William Li" wrote:
>Thanks Ted. No worries on the commitment side. Either way I'd start
>learning and contributing.
>
>If there are ways to check contributions by companies, it could be a
>win-win for both the individuals and the companies who are sponsoring.
Hi William,
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:14 AM, William Li
wrote:
> If there are ways to check contributions by companies, it could be a
> win-win for both the individuals and the companies who are sponsoring.
>
It could be a win if Apache were interested in being a pay-for-play sort of
foundation.
We aren't
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Raphael Bircher
wrote:
> The challenge that is unique to OpenOffice as you are well aware is
>> the fact that
>> it is both a product and a project.
>>
>
> It's a bit provocative. What would happened if we drop the product, but
> don't retire as a project.
Could
Hi Roman
Am .04.2017, 17:06 Uhr, schrieb Roman Shaposhnik :
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Raphael Bircher
wrote:
Hi Ted
Am .04.2017, 06:14 Uhr, schrieb Ted Dunning :
Raphael,
Why don't you get some folks together and start a company that solicits
donations to support OO development and
On 04/20/2017 10:27 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
>Why don't you manage to take over the Apache OpenOffice users in all
these years.
I've thought about it, but my basic approach to getting things done
conflicts with doing things the Apache Way.
>Why LibreOffice lose users like the City of Munich.
This has not bean dealt with that way for many projects historically.
E.g. not all maven plugins are served via dist, but via repository.a.o.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 20.04.2017 um 18:11 schrieb sebb :
>
> On 20 April 2017 at 11:08, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> The geronimo-spec jars do most probably no
Thanks Ted. No worries on the commitment side. Either way I'd start learning
and contributing.
If there are ways to check contributions by companies, it could be a win-win
for both the individuals and the companies who are sponsoring.
On 2017-04-19 21:09 (-0700), Ted Dunning wrote:
> Well,
On 20 April 2017 at 11:08, Mark Struberg wrote:
> The geronimo-spec jars do most probably not.
> Should we set this up that way? Probably a good idea...
AIUI all source releases MUST be made through the ASF mirror system.
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages
http://www
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Raphael Bircher
wrote:
> Hi Ted
>
> Am .04.2017, 06:14 Uhr, schrieb Ted Dunning :
>
>> Raphael,
>>
>> Why don't you get some folks together and start a company that solicits
>> donations to support OO development and QA work?
>
>
> That's the Apache like style, and
Hi Benjamin
I've added you so please let me know if you have any problems.
Thanks
Sharan
On 20/04/17 15:55, Benjamin Young wrote:
Hi yeah!
I'm hoping to write-up my ApacheCon "tools" hack-a-thon idea in the Community
wiki...but I lack access.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COM
Hi yeah!
I'm hoping to write-up my ApacheCon "tools" hack-a-thon idea in the Community
wiki...but I lack access.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/ComDev+Wiki
Anyone up for giving user `bigbluehat` page create creds?
Cheers!
Benjamin
--
http://bigbluehat.com/
http://li
This is an incredibly unhelpful response. Don't feed the troll.
On 04/20/2017 01:03 AM, toki wrote:
> On 04/19/2017 09:26 PM, Andy Wenk wrote:
>
>> * are there problems in the community - especially among the developers?
>
> What has happened to Apache OpenOffice was been entirely predictably.
Hi Ted
Am .04.2017, 06:14 Uhr, schrieb Ted Dunning :
Raphael,
Why don't you get some folks together and start a company that solicits
donations to support OO development and QA work?
That's the Apache like style, and that's exactly the reason why i write to
community and not to the openoff
Hi Toki
It's interesting how you jump in every time we talk about trouble at
OpenOffice. I know, that you and some LibreOffice guys want to see Apache
OpenOffice dead. If we are so bad, you should better ask your self, why
you don't manage to take over the Apache OpenOffice users in all thi
Reporter.a.o does not automatically extract release data from JIRA.
You have to tell it which JIRA keys to use.
Where a PMC has multiple products, you also need to provide a prefix
if the JIRA release ids don't include that.
Otherwise it gets very confusing...
Or you can maintain the release ver
The geronimo-spec jars do most probably not.
Should we set this up that way? Probably a good idea...
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 20.04.2017 um 12:02 schrieb John D. Ament :
>
> Romain,
>
> Releases are sourced based on commits to your dist directory. Do xbean
> releases go through our normal mirroring
Romain,
Releases are sourced based on commits to your dist directory. Do xbean
releases go through our normal mirroring (e.g. source releases)?
John
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:56 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> working on geronimo board i realized https://reporter.apache.org/ can
>
Hi guys,
working on geronimo board i realized https://reporter.apache.org/ can
provide misleading result. I suspect it comes from the fact geronimo uses
multiple jira projects.
Question is: how can we validate there is an issue (bug, config issue or
something else) regarding jira integration? for
24 matches
Mail list logo
