On 04/20/2017 10:27 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: >Why don't you manage to take over the Apache OpenOffice users in all these years.
I've thought about it, but my basic approach to getting things done conflicts with doing things the Apache Way. >Why LibreOffice lose users like the City of Munich. a) That was a proposal, not an implementation; b) That announcement was a surprise to the IT department; c) The proposed migration flies in the face of both official EU and DE policy; >I'm also sure that you will see the problem all outside LibreOffice. LibO has a slightly different set of issues. The two biggest being an over-reliance on paid developers, and too few corporate sponsors. >At the moment you are in better condition, yes. But it doesn't give you the right to spread FUD over Apache OpenOffice. Thanks! I'm guessing that you are objecting to my statement that OOo checked every box for rejecting a project, under both the ASF guidelines as a whole, and all of the projects under its wings, which either a formal, or informal set of criteria to use to accept/reject sub-projects from the outside. Unfortunately, for you, that is the way that cookie crumbles. jonathon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
