Re: Consensus process

2010-09-20 Thread Benson Margulies
https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=15ru0kwhqAbT8QAVC5Bs0KMeT06ZP5RNnIIbEbeDVQjo&hl=en Lazy consensus lazily added. On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Ross, > > I completely spaced that out. I'm quite familiar with it. I'll add it. > This is exactly why I wanted to g

Re: Consensus process

2010-09-20 Thread Benson Margulies
Ross, I completely spaced that out. I'm quite familiar with it. I'll add it. This is exactly why I wanted to get a review. --benson On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > This is a fine post and I have no objections to it being published as is. > However, in the projects I wor

Re: Consensus process

2010-09-20 Thread Ross Gardler
This is a fine post and I have no objections to it being published as is. However, in the projects I work on the concept of Lazy Consensus is critical. That is, for the majority of actions permission need not be sought since most actions can be reversed. Thus non objection means consensus. Thi

Re: Consensus process

2010-09-20 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
+1 Antoine On 9/20/2010 4:20 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: I think I posted the link to a folder instead of a link to the doc. https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=15ru0kwhqAbT8QAVC5Bs0KMeT06ZP5RNnIIbEbeDVQjo&hl=en https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=15ru0kwhqAbT8QAVC5Bs0KMeT06ZP5RNn

Re: Consensus process

2010-09-20 Thread Benson Margulies
I think I posted the link to a folder instead of a link to the doc. https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=15ru0kwhqAbT8QAVC5Bs0KMeT06ZP5RNnIIbEbeDVQjo&hl=en > > https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=15ru0kwhqAbT8QAVC5Bs0KMeT06ZP5RNnIIbEbeDVQjo&hl=en > > Care to read before I put it on the b

Re: Consensus process

2010-09-20 Thread Benson Margulies
I wrote a draft: https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=15ru0kwhqAbT8QAVC5Bs0KMeT06ZP5RNnIIbEbeDVQjo&hl=en Care to read before I put it on the blog? On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 16/08/2010 23:03, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> I have a goofy blog at blogger. Is the