Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for July 2011 (dev@commons.apache.org)

2011-07-08 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, please review and add/modify what is missing: Mentors can copy & sign once agreed it is the version we agree. TIA, have a nice day!!! Simo OGNL Apache OGNL is a Java development framework for Object-Graph Navigation Language, plus other extras such as list projection and selection an

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for July 2011 (dev@commons.apache.org)

2011-07-08 Thread Simone Tripodi
ort. A reported above, codebase has been imported & polished, we are in the middle of a big refactoring stripping off generated code by JavaCC that was versioned in the SCM and modified. Signed off by mentor: http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jul 8, 2011

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for July 2011 (dev@commons.apache.org)

2011-07-08 Thread Simone Tripodi
l the best! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: > Well done Simone!! > > On 8 July 2011 09:02, Simone Tripodi wrote: > >> Hi all guys, >> please review and add/modify what is missin

[DISCOVERY][DISCUSS] additional class for Google Guice integration

2011-07-11 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, lately in my projects I've been frequently repeating the pattern described in [1], so, to avoid useless c'n'p I would propose to provide an already compiled module that makes easier the Google Guice integration with Discovery. Google Guice could be provided as a 'optional' or 'provided

Re: [DISCOVERY][DISCUSS] additional class for Google Guice integration

2011-07-11 Thread Simone Tripodi
/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi all guys, >> lately in my projects I've been frequently repeating the pattern >> described in [1], so, to avoid use

Re: [DISCOVERY][DISCUSS] additional class for Google Guice integration

2011-07-11 Thread Simone Tripodi
it? Have a nice day, all the best! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi Matt, >> it sounds indeed reasonable, thanks for

[digester] Apache Commons Digester3 is on JaxEnter!

2011-07-12 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, just to let you aware that Apache Commons Digester 3 release has been announced on JaxEnter[1]! All the best, have a nice day Simo [1] http://jaxenter.com/first-rc-of-jdk7-arrives-36709.html http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/

[digester] Jaxenter interview about Digester3!!!

2011-07-12 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, just to share with you all a small interview I had with Jaxenter today during lunch-time, I hope that my fellows appreciate how things have been exposed! Agreements section is not missing! :) Have a nice day, all the best! Simo [1] http://jaxenter.com/what-s-new-in-apache-commons-dige

[graph & collections] Fibonacci Heap implementation

2011-07-13 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, in order to improve graph algorithms performances, I started implementing in [graph] an advanced priority queue called Fibonacci Heap[1], based on detailed description of University of Science and Technology of China's lessons[2]. You can find initial implementation on 'collections'[3]

Re: [DISCOVERY][DISCUSS] additional class for Google Guice integration

2011-07-18 Thread Simone Tripodi
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi Matt!!! >> I still continue preferring Discovery over Java6 ServiceLoader just >> for a small reason: it

Re: [DISCOVERY][DISCUSS] additional class for Google Guice integration

2011-07-19 Thread Simone Tripodi
http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Simone Tripodi wrote: > >> Hi all guys, >> looks there are not objections on adding 3rd parties integration >> modules on [Discovery], I'll take care on it as soon as I receive my >> ne

Re: [graph & collections] Fibonacci Heap implementation

2011-07-19 Thread Simone Tripodi
ons] development must focus first > on a release of a Java 5 version of what it has, rather than new code. > Stephen > > On 14 July 2011 01:19, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Hi all guys, >> in order to improve graph algorithms performances, I started >> implementing in [grap

Re: [ognl] Missing incubator report

2011-07-19 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Christian, I wrote it time ago as a reply of July11[1] request, can you please sign and attach? Otherwise just tell me if I am allowed to paste and sign at your plece, for me it works as well! :P Many thanks in advance, all the best! PS not sure but IIUS that's the third report we submit... [1

Re: [ognl] Missing incubator report

2011-07-19 Thread Simone Tripodi
http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Oh oh thanks, this is a mentor fail :-) > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi Christian, >> I wrote it time ago as a reply of July11[1] request, can

Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)

2011-07-19 Thread Simone Tripodi
Great achievement Henri, and congrats for the release!!! I'm so sorry I didn't take part to the review process but honestly not being familiar with Lang I was a little worried on influencing both positively/negatively the vote. I'll do my best to help more next time! Have a nice day, all the best!

Re: [graph & collections] Fibonacci Heap implementation

2011-07-19 Thread Simone Tripodi
ve a help! Many thanks, all the best!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi Stephen >> it looks like indeed that [collec

Re: [compress] Require Java5?

2011-07-21 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, I'm +1 to Java5 too. And IMHO many other should follow the same path :P Have a nice day, all the best! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Henri Yandel

Re: [sandbox] class scanning + karma requests

2011-07-22 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys! That sounds really interesting!!! I think that bringing the new ideas in existing [meiyo] APIs would allow us releasing a new component soon! Thanks in advance for your help and interesting, looking forward to hear from you soon!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://

Re: [sandbox] class scanning + karma requests

2011-07-22 Thread Simone Tripodi
t;> In any case you are highly welcome to join forces - any idea/opinion/help is >> welcome! >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> --- On Fri, 7/22/11, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> >>> From: Simone Tripodi >>> Subject: Re: [sandbox] class scann

Re: [compress] Proposed Roadmap

2011-07-22 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hallo Stefan!!! I think it would be nice having also s pure Java implementation of the Snappy[1] compression (the Google's compression), I found a Java implementation[2] but it's JNI wrapper :/ WDYT? Unfortunately my C++ skills are horrible but I'm available to help :P Alles gute!, all the best, Si

Re: [compress] Closing Streams and System.in (COMPRESS-128)

2011-07-22 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hallo Stefan, I personally like more the NoCloseStream approach, it would help avoiding code redundancies (having the Sysout check pattern repeated doesn't look nice IMHO) HTH, have a nice day, all the best! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Jul 23, 20

Re: [sandbox] class scanning + karma requests

2011-07-22 Thread Simone Tripodi
omplete, the client SPIs should be > called back using a concurrent Executor, where most of the real > filtering can take place. > > Matt > >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> --- On Fri, 7/22/11, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> >>> From: Simon

BCEL/JCS code repackaging (Was Re: svn commit: r1150277 - /commons/proper/jcs/trunk/src/java/org/apache/jcs/auxiliary/disk/jdbc/JDBCDiskCache.java)

2011-07-24 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi David!!! this mail just to suggest you moving the JCS package from 'org.apache.jcs' to 'org.apache.commons.jcs' same refactoring has to be applied to BCEL, from 'org.apache.bcel' to 'org.apache.commons.bcel' HTH, have a nice day! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.o

Re: [ognl] Signing off incubation status items

2011-07-24 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Christian, thanks for taking care of it!!! We received the software grants from both project owners Drew & Luc, that are OGNL committers as well, so I think you can sign off that item! TIA, all the best!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Jul 24, 2

Re: BCEL/JCS code repackaging (Was Re: svn commit: r1150277 - /commons/proper/jcs/trunk/src/java/org/apache/jcs/auxiliary/disk/jdbc/JDBCDiskCache.java)

2011-07-24 Thread Simone Tripodi
; On 24 July 2011 08:15, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> Hi David!!! >>> this mail just to suggest you moving the JCS package from >>> 'org.apache.jcs' to 'org.apache.commons.jcs' >>> same refactoring has to be applied to BCEL, from 'o

Re: [compress] Keep old Javadocs?

2011-07-25 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Stefan!!! I think that keeping old javadocs would have more sense when we release major releases, for cases such as compress 1.1 -> 1.2, tags like @since, @deprecated, ... are more than enough. just my 2 cents, have a nice day!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.o

Re: [sandbox] [classscan] classscan API design review needed

2011-07-27 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Mark!!! after had a (quick, honestly) look at your APIs I'm more convinced we can merge our efforts to provide our users a kickass library to scan the classpath. Your ScanJob class could be configured with my Meiyo EDSL filters[1] instead of passing parameters to the constructor, allowing users

Re: [sandbox] [classscan] classscan API design review needed

2011-07-27 Thread Simone Tripodi
articular classpath >>> elements (or in xbean-finder terms, Archives) for scanning by a >>> particular client is one of Mark's top priorities, so this is >>> definitely on the table.  Maybe we should start a page in the Commons >>> wiki to enumerate all the

Re: [sandbox] [classscan] classscan API design review needed

2011-07-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hallo Mark, > > Some classscan-clients maybe first need to read some config files for getting > exclude/include info. > sorry for being repetitive but that's here too that I suggest adopting the Meiyo's alike way of configuring the component via EDSL instead of config files - there's no reason t

Re: [chain] Forking to a 2.0?

2011-07-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Elijah, it sounds a great interesting contribution, I haven't seen [chain] development activity lately so I eventually volunteer to apply the patch. Thanks in advance for your effort, [chain] if one of the components that need new energy. Two recommendations: * we are updating components code

Re: [chain] Forking to a 2.0?

2011-07-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
tarted yet, but that's another story :P Just to avoid mistakes, let me find it on markmail :P Have a nice day, all the best! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:01 PM,

[logging] logging vs slf4j

2011-07-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, I remember I raw a thread - not sure if I did it here at commons or somewhere else here at apache - where specified we prefer adding [logging] as components dependency instead of slf4j... Did I just get crazy or someone can point me to the right direction please? :) Many thanks in adva

Re: [chain] Forking to a 2.0?

2011-07-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
just the type of information that I was looking for. Skipping > a logging refactor vastly simplifies the work I was planning on doing. > > I won't be able to publish my proof of concept until sometime next > week because I have a vacation coming up. > > Thanks, > -Elij

Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j

2011-07-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
n Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi all guys, >> I remember I raw a thread - not sure if I did it here at commons or >> somewhere else here at apache - where specified we prefer adding >> [logging] as components dependency instead of slf4j... >

Re: [sandbox] [classscan] classscan API design review needed

2011-07-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
{ public void doHandle( String path, Class classPathEntry ) { doWhatEverWeNeed(); } } ); } } > LieGrue, > st

Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j

2011-07-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
>>> [1] >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/branches/BRANCH_2_0_EXPERIMENTAL/rgoers/ >>> >>> >>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >>> >>>> Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :) >>>

Re: [ognl] Status items & Graduation

2011-07-29 Thread Simone Tripodi
Agreed, thanks Christina for the follow-up. BTW don't forget we have also Luc onboard ;) Alles gute, have a nice day, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 29/07/2011 10:53, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :

Re: [sandbox] [classscan] classscan API design review needed

2011-07-29 Thread Simone Tripodi
rver somehow. >> This could be some >> form of Domain Specific Language, but I'm not sure if this >> isn't a complete >> overkill here. >> > >> > It could be interesting to use the DSL approach for >> the callback filters >> of course. &g

Re: [ognl] Status items & Graduation

2011-07-29 Thread Simone Tripodi
please sorry for the *terrible* typo :D :D anyway I would have spoke about Christina Applegate, I like more than Aguilera :D http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> I guess Simo was talking about Luke Blans

Re: [chain] Upgrading to Maven parent version 21

2011-07-30 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Elijah, thanks for putting effort on chain! Just a silly question: did the test fail also before parent upgrade? In that case, I'd say i is an error in /trunk. Unfortunately my new laptop still hasn't arrived so I can't install everything and check myself, otherwise I would help you a little mor

Re: [chain] Upgrading to Maven parent version 21

2011-07-30 Thread Simone Tripodi
The first thing I thought was that > it was broken in trunk, but apparently that's not the case. Oddly > digester parses out 19 commands with the updated parent and 17 with > the original parent. > > Thanks, > -Elijah > > On Saturday, July 30, 2011, Simone Tripodi wrot

Re: [chain] Upgrading to Maven parent version 21

2011-07-31 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Elijah, I'd investigate on Maven versions first as Phil suggested, before purging the local repo :P HTH, have a nice WE! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 6:23 PM, David Karlsen wrote: > Try nuking the local maven repository in case

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for August 2011 (dev@commons.apache.org)

2011-08-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, follows below my report, it contains part copied from July since they didn't accept we reported after the deadline. Mentors: please sign and paste on Wiki! :P TIA, all the best and have a nice day!!! Simo OGNL Apache OGNL is a Java development framework for Object-Graph Navigation La

Re: Nightly snapshots

2011-08-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 for uploading snapshots AFAIK jobs on Continuum are already set up for every commons component, so we should "just" properly configure the artifacts deploy... All the best, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Ralph Goers wrote

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for August 2011 (dev@commons.apache.org)

2011-08-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Christian!!! agreed. I reported too quickly and didn't pay enough attention on discriminating what we previously reported - and what I should have put out from the c'n'p :P Feel free to modify the report according to your latest observations!!! Thanks for taking care of it, very appreciated! Hav

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for August 2011 (dev@commons.apache.org)

2011-08-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi Simo, > > I added it as you said. Please let me know if I stripped off to much > or if you have other objections. Otherwise we have done our duty ;-) > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2011 > > Cheers > > On Mon, Aug

Re: Nightly snapshots

2011-08-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 > > I really prefer a CI-triggered publishing. I see no values in producing a > "nightly" if nothing has been changed. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@comm

Re: [VOTE][DAEMON] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.7

2011-08-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 I additionally used a shell script (kindly provided on Christian Grobmeier blog[1]) to check signatures and output is OK Well done!!! Have a nice day, all the best, Simo [1] http://www.grobmeier.de/checking-md5-and-signatures-with-a-shell-script-29062011.html $ ./verify.sh Checking file: ./

Re: Nexus vs rsync-repository releases

2011-08-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
> > I am also worried about a closed tool like Nexus being used to publish > Apache stuff. > > Luc > This is curious, indeed. I always wondered why we use Nexus instead of "eating our own dog food" Apache Archiva[1], but worried to receive a reply "why didn't you RTFM on http://xyz..."; :P Have a

[collections] 4.0 release path

2011-08-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, I'm (re)starting having a good slot of spare time, I volunteered to help Matt on finalizing the [collections] release, but after had a look at the open issues I think we should agree on what including and what not. Does anyone already have a good overview/idea of collections roadmap? M

Re: [collections] 4.0 release path

2011-08-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
t;>> work recently in fact. Everything else except showstopper bugs can >>> wait IMO. >> >> Indeed, this seems to resonate with Hen's recent treatise on >> (paraphrased) why the hell we take so long. >> >> Matt >> >>> >>> Gary

Re: [compress] XZ support and inconsistencies in the existing compressors

2011-08-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Lasse! I'd personally like if you could fill an Issue on Jira and submit your XZ implementation as a patch that naturally fits in the org.apache.commons.compress package and you continue contributing on maintaining it - maybe depending on an external package would be more difficult since commons

Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j

2011-08-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
Well said Hen, big +1 :) > > B) If you are an app, use log4j. or logback, depending on the cases, IMHO > Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Wed,

Re: [collections] 4.0 release path

2011-08-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
generics release as 3.5 to satisfy that need... which >>>>>> allows 4.0 to have generics plus the benefit of major refactoring if >>>>>> necessary (could also be called 4.0 and 5.0). >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at

Re: Deploying snapshot builds

2011-08-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
I agree with Phil, there should be a general agreement http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 8/4/11 11:45 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> If we are going to vote let's make a decision per project. > > No, I think th

Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j

2011-08-08 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all, >> >> If we really have to reconsider this stuff, then I'd propose to >> >> a) Use java.util.logging, because it doesn't require any additional >> dependencies and is guaranteed to work anywhere. >> b) Carefully document how to bridge jul to log4j, because that's >> exactly what's required

Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j

2011-08-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys!!! sorry for joining so late the discussion (working on some stuff as bricklayer at home!!! didn't know it is fun!) * I don't understand why JULI should be so "complicated" to be adopted... if in trouble, please take a look at juli-to-log4j[1] bride written by our ASF mate Paul Smith

Re: [lang] Adding a Memoizer class

2011-08-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Gary, even if I'm not active on Lang, I'm very +1 for introducing this feature, looks a great addition!!! Have a nice day, all the best! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hello All, > > I am currently u

Re: [lang] Adding a Memoizer class

2011-08-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
Good news! :) http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > We are good! I asked Brian, one of the authors and the code is in the > public domain: > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Brian Goetz wrote: >> No license issu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons as TLP for Jakarta BSF ?

2011-08-10 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 for me as well, sounds BSF perfectly fits Apache Commons community :) All the best, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > sebb wrote: > >> BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta. >> >> It's not really big e

Re: [JCS] Deployed Maven2 site

2011-08-10 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Thomas, just had a quick look (I'm from the EU mirror) and everything looks good to me! Have a nice day, all the best! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > Hi folks, > > I finally managed to move the s

Re: [VOTE] Accept BSF as a Commons component

2011-08-13 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 for both welcome to commons!!! http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > +1 to both votes > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:13 AM, sebb wrote: >> BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta. >> >> It's not really bi

Re: [vote] Graduate OGNL into Commons

2011-08-16 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 YAY http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > (OGNL committer) +1 > > 2011/8/15 Christian Grobmeier : >> OGNL [1] has checked off all status items in the incubator. >> >> Most of the OGNL developers are already

Re: [chain] Apache Chain v2 Proof of Concept

2011-08-16 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Elijah, looking at the patch, it seems that v2.0 is binary compatible to old chain, right? I mean, if in a my hypothetical application I would upgrade to v2 (generics a part) old code should continue working, right? TIA, and count also on me! All the best, have a nice day! Simo http://people.ap

Re: [chain] Apache Chain v2 Proof of Concept

2011-08-16 Thread Simone Tripodi
become a committer! :) Have a nice day, all the best!!! Simo [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/#committers [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Eli

Re: [collections] Iterate over sublists of an original list

2011-08-18 Thread Simone Tripodi
Salut Sébastien, wouldn't the List#subList(int, int)[1] method be helpful for your purposes? HTH, Simo [1] http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/List.html#subList(int, int) http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:26 PM, S

Re: [chain] Apache Chain v2 Proof of Concept

2011-08-18 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all/Elijah, sorry for replying so late but during these days I've been working as bricklayer at home, fixing some stuff :P About the binary compatibility breakage, I have a (maybe silly, hopefully not) idea: marking @Deprecated (and justifying why in the javadoc) the wrong method and adding the

Re: [chain] Apache Chain v2 Proof of Concept

2011-08-19 Thread Simone Tripodi
update the patch so that I get 0 check style errors. I > should have that updated this weekend. > > Thanks, > -Elijah > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi all/Elijah, >> sorry for replying so late but during these days I've been working

[chain][discuss] v2 upgrade

2011-08-21 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, Elijah, a [chain] user, has been submitting worthy contributions[1] to improve and actualize the commons-chains component, providing also patches[2]. I think it is the good time to start speaking about the next [chain] version (no new releases/development in the last months), any objec

Re: [codec] next releases

2011-08-23 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, I'd suggest to go through 1.6 too, even if we have a precedence in the past (before I joined as committer) when the Digester version was promoted from 1.8 to 2.0 just switching to JVM and added Generics... So my "concern" is just make sure we adopt a common policy for every component a

Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade

2011-08-23 Thread Simone Tripodi
able) backward-compatibility breaches. > Then we will understand the proper path forward with respect to > versions and all the changes that cascade from the potential major > version bump. > > Matt > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi all guys, &g

[functor] Method 'XXX' is not designed for extension

2011-08-23 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, in [functor] component there are several classes with checkstyle errors[1] of the type Method '' is not designed for extension - needs to be abstract, final or empty. My opinion is that such classes should be final - but what someone else thinks about it? TIA, all the best!!

Re: [functor] Method 'XXX' is not designed for extension

2011-08-24 Thread Simone Tripodi
t; > Should these classes be final? Taking the example of FoldLeft - are their > circumstances where it would make sense to sub-class FoldLeft? Can it even > be subclassed in a way that would produce something that behaved as a > FoldLeft but over-wrote these flagged methods? > > M

Re: [functor] Method 'XXX' is not designed for extension

2011-08-26 Thread Simone Tripodi
on wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi Matthew! >> >> agreed on such 3rd parties integrations you are speaking about, Google >> Guice would suffer the same (I'm not a fan of Spring :P) >> >> Anyway, as you already

Re: [ognl] Struts Issue

2011-08-29 Thread Simone Tripodi
definitively +1, I didn't understand anyway how to fix OGNL, I personally need more time of investigation, so anyone else can feel free to fix if already knows the solution. I think we should fill an Issue also on OGNL space on Jira, WDYT? Many thanks in advance and thanks for notifying!!! All the

Re: [functor] New summarize component

2011-08-29 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Liviu! nice to hear news for [functor] and thanks for the reminder; no needs to copy'n'paste the jira log since, given the issue id, everybody is able to load the related page and read the original message ;) The right way to proceed is * checkin out the [functor] code[1]; * import your adds;

Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade - follow-up

2011-08-29 Thread Simone Tripodi
://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Matt, > your suggestion makes indeed a lot of sense! I'll copy the /trunk to a > branch and publish the site

Re: [functor] Method 'XXX' is not designed for extension

2011-08-29 Thread Simone Tripodi
> Hi, > > On 26 August 2011 20:06, Simone Tripodi wrote: > >> Hi Matt, >> sorry for the late and for (maybe) silly question, but what's your PoV >> about making classes Vs methods as 'final'? >> > > If I lived in a world without dependenc

Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade - follow-up

2011-08-30 Thread Simone Tripodi
current form without generics. Do you or anyone else have any thoughts on > this? > > Thanks, > -Elijah > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: > >> Hi all guys, >> I just fixed the clirr report generation and deployed the chain2 site >

Re: [RESULT] [vote] Graduate OGNL as a subproject to Apache Commons

2011-08-30 Thread Simone Tripodi
Congratulations to OGNL and thanks a lot Christian for taking care of the graduation process!!! All the best, have a nice day!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Chri

Re: svn commit: r1163488 - /commons/proper/ognl/trunk/pom.xml

2011-08-31 Thread Simone Tripodi
Thanks a lot for taking care of OGNL updates! Have anice day, all the best!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:26 AM, wrote: > Author: bayard > Date: Wed Aug 31 05:26:14 2011 > New Revision: 1163488 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/

Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade - follow-up

2011-08-31 Thread Simone Tripodi
ner common approach used in various projects inside the ASF (cocoon3, for example) and outside (i.e. slf4j). What's your opinion about it? Many thanks in advance, all the best!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Simone

Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade - follow-up

2011-08-31 Thread Simone Tripodi
Benedict wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi all guys, >> I noticed that properly setting the 1.5 as target compliance level, >> there are some @Override annotations that in cases of interfaces >> methods implementation should be droppe

Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade - follow-up

2011-08-31 Thread Simone Tripodi
at 7:06 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> if I remember correctly, maven should be able to aggregate submodules >> apidocs, I will ask to mvn ML. > > Yes, it can. The javadoc plugi

Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade - follow-up

2011-08-31 Thread Simone Tripodi
thanks!!! what about dropping deprecated methods? since we are upgrading to major version, they can be dropped... or not? TIA!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: >> At the same time, everybody: do you agr

Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade - follow-up

2011-08-31 Thread Simone Tripodi
his pattern: > http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> thanks!!! >> what about dropping deprecated methods? since we are upgrading to >> major version, they can be dropped... or not? >> TIA

Re: [ALL] parent pom - update RAT version

2011-09-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 :) Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Go for it !  :) > > Gary > > On Sep 1, 2011, at 21:40, sebb wrote: > >> The current parent pom (21) references an old RAT plugin which is not >> the current Apache

[chain][discuss] v2 upgrade - follow-up - part2

2011-09-02 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi again guys, I did a little work on the v2 branch of [chain] to fix checkstyle errors, obviously clirr[1] errors increased but new ones are IMHO trivial, since concern internal data structures already exposed via getters - the o.a.c.chain.impl.ChainBase#commands was exposed at package level just

[chain][v2] clever context

2011-09-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, I think that generics could help us on improving the Context class; I'm not particularly happy having it extending Map - it is needed anyway for backward compatibility - but it is clear that Context is a place where storing/retrieving objects identified by a key. I propose adding two h

Re: [chain][v2] clever context

2011-09-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
//apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r983137-commons-proper-lang-trunk-src-main-java-org-apache-commons-lang3-ArrayUtils-jaa-td2317854.html). >>  Good luck with that.  It wasn't worth my time to continue to argue >> about it anymore, so I reverted it. >> >&

Re: [chain][v2] clever context

2011-09-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
n Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi all guys, >> I think that generics could help us on improving the Context class; >> I'm not particularly happy having it extending Map - it is needed >> anyway for backward compatibility - but it is

Re: [chain][v2] clever context

2011-09-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
worth my time to continue to argue >> about it anymore, so I reverted it. >> >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Simone Tripodi >> wrote: >>> Hi all guys, >>> I think that generics could help us on improving the Context class; >>> I'm not parti

Re: [chain][v2] clever context

2011-09-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
was shot down >>> (http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r983137-commons-proper-lang-trunk-src-main-java-org-apache-commons-lang3-ArrayUtils-jaa-td2317854.html). >>>  Good luck with that.  It wasn't worth my time to continue to argue >>> about it

[chain][v2] updated clirr report

2011-09-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, the clirr report has just been updated on my personal ASF space[1], can you review please? I think it's time to call a vote to accept the current branch as the trunk, WDYT? Many thanks in advance, have anice day! Simo [1] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.htm

Re: [chain][v2] clever context

2011-09-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
Source = context.retrieve("datasource"); That is able to 'auto-cast' the retrieved object while Map#get() not. HTH, have a nice day! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Raman Gupta wrote: > On 09/04/2011 05:2

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.7 based on RC3

2011-09-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hallo Oliver, I'm reviewing the tag and, sorry for not having noticed before, is there any reason why the Digester is still at 1.8 version? Upgrade to at least 2.1 should be painless enough, even if an upgrade to 3.0 would be nicer :P Anyway, not a blocker, just the time of reviewing all the stuff

Re: [chain][v2] clever context

2011-09-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
thanks James! as you can notice, my English is still poor :) All the best, have a nice day!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 10:00 PM, James Carman wrote: > On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> >

Re: [chain][v2] updated clirr report

2011-09-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:02 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 4 September 2011 20:04, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> Hi all guys, >>> the clirr report has just been updated on my per

Re: [chain][v2] clever context

2011-09-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
Sep 4, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Raman Gupta wrote: >> On 09/04/2011 04:00 PM, James Carman wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Simone Tripodi >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> That is able to 'auto-cast' the retrieved object while Map#get() not. >>&

Re: [chain][v2] clever context

2011-09-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
; won't look very nice. Let's make a break now. >> >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Raman Gupta wrote: >>> On 09/04/2011 04:00 PM, James Carman wrote: >>>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Simone Tripodi >>>> wrote: >>>>> >

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >