Hi all guys, I noticed that properly setting the 1.5 as target compliance level, there are some @Override annotations that in cases of interfaces methods implementation should be dropped. Do you agree on it?
Moreover, I'd like to propose to split the chain component, for v2.0, in a multi-module project: - core APIs; - XML configuration APIs (depends from Digester); - servlet (depends from Servlet APIs); - portlet (depends from Portlet APIs); - faces (depends from Faces APIs). in that way users interested on core APIs only don't need to bring unused code; that looks to me a cleaner common approach used in various projects inside the ASF (cocoon3, for example) and outside (i.e. slf4j). What's your opinion about it? Many thanks in advance, all the best!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi guys, > sorry I'm late but looks like my local timezone sometimes doesn't > allow me replying promptly :P > > @Matt: you are welcome, any time :) Unfortunately I'm not so familiar > with [chain] codebase, I cannot be useful ATM :( > > @Elijah: patches are always welcome ;) For those tests that seems > generic, replacing the empty generics with Object should be the trick, > or not? > > Have a nice day, all the best!!! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Elijah Zupancic <eli...@zupancic.name> > wrote: >> Hi Simo, >> >> Before we look at releasing the changes (after a trunk merge), I think that >> we will need to update the documentation to include Generics and possibly >> change the unit tests to use Generics. That said - I'm cautious about >> changing the unit tests because they are verifying that the API works in its >> current form without generics. Do you or anyone else have any thoughts on >> this? >> >> Thanks, >> -Elijah >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Simone Tripodi >> <simonetrip...@apache.org>wrote: >> >>> Hi all guys, >>> I just fixed the clirr report generation and deployed the chain2 site >>> on my personal ASF space[1], in order we can discuss the patch that >>> Elijah kindly provided. >>> WDYT? It is IMHO acceptable in order to apply the modifications in /trunk. >>> TIA, all the best!!! >>> Simo >>> >>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simone Tripodi >>> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >>> > Hi Matt, >>> > your suggestion makes indeed a lot of sense! I'll copy the /trunk to a >>> > branch and publish the site, once applied the patch, on my home@asf as >>> > soon as I have spare time today, so we can discuss together clirr >>> > report results. >>> > Many thanks for your hint, have a nice day!!! >>> > Simo >>> > >>> > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> > http://www.99soft.org/ >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> I am generally in favor. I think it could be good to apply his patch >>> >> on a branch so we can discuss the clirr results and agree on the >>> >> severity of the (IMHO forgivable) backward-compatibility breaches. >>> >> Then we will understand the proper path forward with respect to >>> >> versions and all the changes that cascade from the potential major >>> >> version bump. >>> >> >>> >> Matt >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Simone Tripodi >>> >> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all guys, >>> >>> Elijah, a [chain] user, has been submitting worthy contributions[1] to >>> >>> improve and actualize the commons-chains component, providing also >>> >>> patches[2]. >>> >>> I think it is the good time to start speaking about the next [chain] >>> >>> version (no new releases/development in the last months), any >>> >>> objections on applying Elijah patch? >>> >>> I can take care of it but please let me know if anyone else want to do. >>> >>> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day!!! >>> >>> Simo >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/ajh3sunrst7x5klv >>> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-53 >>> >>> >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
