hahahaha :D I asked because there's one user that proposed a [chain] evolution, and one of suggested improvements is migrating over slf4j - I (wrongly, maybe) suggested to keep [logging] because here at commons we continue using it but, as said, I maybe reported a wrong fact.
Do we encourage such kind of migrations or we are more conservative? Many thanks in advance, all the best!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :) > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Simone Tripodi > <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi all guys, >> I remember I raw a thread - not sure if I did it here at commons or >> somewhere else here at apache - where specified we prefer adding >> [logging] as components dependency instead of slf4j... >> Did I just get crazy or someone can point me to the right direction please? >> :) >> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!! >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
