Re: [lang] trunk does not compile due to missing ComparatorUtils

ons-lang/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/compare    line 86 > Java Problem > > Gary > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > >> Rolled back. Sorry for the screwup. >> >> Hen >> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Gary Greg

Re: [lang]Question about StringUtils chomp and removeEnd

This is committed (r1161997 + LANG-748). Thanks again Verneri. Hen On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Agreed :) Nice catch. > > I'll also deprecate the chomp(String,String) version for removal in 4.0. > > Hen > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:02 P

[lang] ComparatorChain redesign

Looking at the Collections ComparatorChain class, I think it's overcomplicated. The current API is: public class ComparatorChain implements Comparator, Serializable { public ComparatorChain() { public ComparatorChain(Comparator comparator) { public ComparatorChain(Comparator comparato

Re: [Cache] Status?

Very, very dead. You have to dig deeper to get the real dates, 2007 is when it moved out of being inside Jakarta. http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?path=%2Fjakarta%2Fcommons%2Fsandbox%2Fcache Looks like it was an import of code by rwaldhoff in May 2001, and that was pretty much it.

Re: [lang] ComparatorChain redesign

's awesome: > > http://www.polygenelubricants.com/2010/10/elegant-comparison-logic-with-guava.html > > Recommend that ComparatorChain.. just do what Ordering does. :) > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Looking at the Collections ComparatorChain class, I thin

Re: [Cache] Status?

It just moved over from Jakarta, so probably not as obvious on the site yet. Hen On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote: > Thank you Henri. > > Somehow I missed the JCS project, which looks to be superior to cache. > > -Greg > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11

Re: [IO] 2.1 release?

Looks good to me: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+IO+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%222.1%22+AND+status+%3D+Resolved+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide More than enough for a release as soon as someone can do the RCs. Hen On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:31

Re: [lang] Running lang under a security manager and LANG-744

I'm less concerned with the 115 errors, unless they're all as grievous as the StringUtils one - ie) the method causing trouble is not the only one broken. If the error happened when calling stripAccents, that would be workable; but having all of StringUtils unavailable is very painful. One option

Re: [lang] Running lang under a security manager and LANG-744

Bad first paragraph. ie) the method causing trouble is not the one the user wants to use. For example - they want to use StringUtils.chomp, and the implementation of stripAccents is blocking them. Sorry for the double post, Hen On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > I

Re: [lang] Running lang under a security manager and LANG-744

On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:10 AM, sebb wrote: > On 3 September 2011 05:37, Henri Yandell wrote: >> I'm less concerned with the 115 errors, unless they're all as grievous >> as the StringUtils one - ie) the method causing trouble is not the >> only one broken. &

Re: [lang] Better Validate.isInstance messages

+1 :) On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 7 September 2011 19:26, Gary Gregory wrote: >> > Hi All: >> > >> > The message for the exception thrown by Validate.isInstance does not >> mention >> > the actual type, only the expe

Re: svn commit: r1165701 - /commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/StringUtils.java

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:16 AM, wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Tue Sep  6 15:16:47 2011 > New Revision: 1165701 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1165701&view=rev > Log: > LANG-744 StringUtils throws java.security.AccessControlException on Google > App Engine > Change static code to catch

Re: [parent] adding buildnumber in the manifest entries

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:59 AM, sebb wrote: > On 9 September 2011 08:35, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Good morning guys, >> I just did an experiment on my local checkout of the parent pom, >> adding the buildnumber plugin, in order to have a new >> `Implementation-Build` manifest entry in the jars, w

[bsf] Site needs moving over

The site for BSF is still on jakarta.apache.org. Is someone working on moving it over to Commons? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [bsf] Site needs moving over

On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:28 AM, sebb wrote: > On 11 September 2011 11:45, sebb wrote: >> On 11 September 2011 07:35, Henri Yandell wrote: >>> The site for BSF is still on jakarta.apache.org. Is someone working on >>> moving it over to Commons? >> >> I c

Re: [bsf] Site needs moving over

On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:39 AM, sebb wrote: > On 11 September 2011 18:14, Henri Yandell wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:28 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 11 September 2011 11:45, sebb wrote: >>>> On 11 September 2011 07:35, Henri Yandell wrote: >

Re: [dbutils] Async Version

looking to use it in the > not-too-distant future for some stuff and I prefer to pull in all my deps > from maven repos, rather than having one-offs. > > Thanks! > > Bill- > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > >> Awesome - thanks Bill :)

[VOTE] [dbutils] Release DbUtils 1.4 (based on RC1)

RC1 is available here: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-dbutils-1.4-rc1/ SVN: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/dbutils/tags/DBUTILS_1_4_RC1/ Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-dbutils-1.4-rc1/commons-dbutils-1.4-bundle.jar Website: http://peo

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons DbUtils - Default Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)

Irritating. Looks like Continuum tries to deploy the 1.4 version and, thankfully, it fails for some reason. On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Continuum@vmbuild wrote: > Online report : > http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=12120&projectId=74 > > Build statistics: >  St

Re: [VOTE] [dbutils] Release DbUtils 1.4 (based on RC1)

Fair enough on the source archive. Vote cancelled. Adding a 'check top dir = archive name' check to a release script would help catch that. Hen On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:21 AM, sebb wrote: > On 15 September 2011 07:55, Henri Yandell wrote: >> RC1 is availabl

Re: [VOTE] [dbutils] Release DbUtils 1.4 (based on RC1)

Inline for all items. On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:21 AM, sebb wrote: > On 15 September 2011 07:55, Henri Yandell wrote: >> RC1 is available here: >> >>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-dbutils-1.4-rc1/ > > Sigs and hashes OK, source agrees with svn tag. Builds

[dbutils] Website items

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >>> Website: >>> >>>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-dbutils-1.4-rc1/site/ >> >> No TM on logo. >> DbUtils should be used as adjective in first mention on front page. I'm going to l

Re: [dbutils] Async Version

tripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Bill Speirs wrote: >> Great! Let me know if there is anything I can do to help... >> >> Bill- >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> >>>

Re: [dbutils] Async Version

r next RC! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Are you ready for another RC Simone? >> >> I can build one tomorrow night if you are. Otherwise it will be n

Uploading a bundle to Nexus

Her'es my email from the Lang release. Nowadays I use jar to build it from scratch rather than having Maven build a jar. jar cf ../../${ARTIFACTID}-${VERSION}-bundle.jar *.jar *.pom *.asc Hen -- Forwarded message -- From: Henri Yandell Date: Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:

Re: [math] Porting someone else's work (license and all that)

CPL is a weak-copyleft license - ie) putting source derived from it inside Commons Math will make all of Commons Math CPL licensed. If Mr Saunders is the only copyright owner, and were happy to sign a grant or ICLA, then the CPL wouldn't apply in our use of it (ie: no issue). Hen 2011/9/27 Sébas

Re: svn commit: r1176967 - /commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC1/

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, sebb wrote: > On 28 September 2011 18:20, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 28 September 2011 18:08,   wrote: >>> > Author: ggregory >>> > Date: Wed Sep 28 17:08:45 2011 >>> > New Revision: 1176967 >>> > >>> > URL: htt

[DBUtils] RC2?

Are the previous issues now put to bed? ie) Should I roll an RC2? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r1176967 - /commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC1/

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > > > > > On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 28 September 2011 18:20, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:1

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

-1. I got the unit test failure again: Failed tests: testTailer(org.apache.commons.io.input.TailerTest): fileNotFound should not be called expected:<0> but was:<1> Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.959 sec <<< FAILURE! testTailer(org.apache.commons.io.input.Tail

Re: [lang] who's on deck for 3.0.2?

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > * LANG-532 -> Should be resolved for 3.0.2; or we should remove the code > added. > > I'm feeling towards -1 for 3.0.2, Adding [collections] code feels of scope > for a x.x.x maintenance release and needs more debate. I'd prefer to release > a

Re: [lang] who's on deck for 3.0.2?

h Apache code.  Since it implements a JDK > interface, the interface will probably not change. > > chas > > > On 10/3/11 7:13 PM, "Henri Yandell" wrote: > >>First we need to resolve or reversion the open issues: >> >>https://issues.apache.org/

Re: [lang] who's on deck for 3.0.2?

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> * LANG-532 -> Should be resolved for 3.0.2; or we should remove the code >> added. >> >> I'm feeling towards -1 for 3.0.2, Adding [collectio

Re: [DBUtils] RC2?

wrote: >> I think so... +1 vote from me. >> >> Bill- >> On Sep 29, 2011 1:54 AM, "Henri Yandell" wrote: >>> Are the previous issues now put to bed? ie) Should I roll an RC2? >>> >>> Hen >>> >>>

Re: [DBUtils] RC2?

> > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Tech problems on my end :) ie) The wireless on my Linux build box is >> being silly and not working; and I don't have anything else setup >> right now with a working JDK 1.5 to do the build. >> >

Re: [DbUtils] checkstyle vs clirr

Clirr wins (assuming you're keeping 100% backwards compat and that clirr isn't playing up). checkstyle at 0 is an ideal not a necessary. Hen On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > there are checkstyle violations that, if fixed, cause clirr > violations, and clirr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons-DbUtils 1.4 Baed on RC3

+1. On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > I'm writing to (re)call for a vote to release apache > commons-dbutils-1.4 based on RC3. > > Please take in consideration that Checkstyle violations cannot be > fixed due to retro-compatibility issue. > Clirr error is a f

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons-DbUtils 1.4 Baed on RC3

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 4:51 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23 October 2011 12:44, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Hi all guys, >> Since 72 hours passed I'm declaring this vote as closed and passed >> with 4 positive votes from PMCs: >> >>  * Oliver Heger >>  * Henri

[VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0.2 (Based on RC1)

A first pass at 3.0.2. I rolled back the comparators to be considered/argued about for 3.0.3. RC1 is available here: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0.2-RC1/ SVN: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_2_RC1/ Website: http://people.apache.org/~bay

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0.2 (Based on RC1)

rt, it now says "Comparison Version: 3.0.1", > not "(,3.0.2)" > > Gary > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > >> A first pass at 3.0.2. I rolled back the comparators to be >> considered/argued about for 3.0.3. >> >&

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0.2 (Based on RC1)

Thanks Sebb :) I've upgraded the deps, fixed the @sinces to 3.1 and removed the explicit clirr version setting. Hen On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:18 AM, sebb wrote: > On 9 November 2011 08:09, Henri Yandell wrote: >> A first pass at 3.0.2. I rolled back the comparators to be >&g

[LANG] slow test :(

Ouch. On my Mac: Running org.apache.commons.lang3.builder.ReflectionToStringBuilderConcurrencyTest Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 2, Time elapsed: 42.471 sec Wondering when my debian virtualbox image is going to respond. It's still spinning :) Hen --

Re: [LANG] slow test :(

nish yet), plus if a release/site still does multiple testing then that really adds up. So I'm -1 to the test because it takes too long to be part of the build process. Hen On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > &g

[VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.1 (Based on RC1)

Post the abortive 3.0.2 vote, a first pass at 3.1. I rolled back the comparators to be considered/argued about for 3.2. RC1 is available here: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.1-RC1/ SVN: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_1_RC1/ Website: http://

Re: [csv] Java 5?

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 10/11/2011 09:21, James Carman a écrit : >> >> It might need a rename, since it looks like its scope has changed.  It >> doesn't really just deal with CSV files anymore.  It allows custom >> delimiter characters.  I have a few other sugge

Re: [csv] Java 5?

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:56 AM, James Carman > wrote: > >> +1 from me.  What about rolling it into io?  It is I/O after all. >> > > Hi All, > > Hm, yes. it is IO, but so is a database, and a CSV file is a subset of the > flat-file format, w

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.1 (Based on RC1)

A mvn clean package just worked fine for me on Oracle's 1.7.0-01-b08. I'm not on the 64-bit version though. Anyone else able to test? Hen On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Hen, > > Henri Yandell wrote: > >> Post the abortive 3.0.2 vote, a

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.1 (Based on RC1)

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Gary Gregory wrote: > >> I do not see the Java 7 error reported in this thread. >> >> Is it random or does it happen all the time? > > I ran it twice and it failed twice with the same errors. > >> I tested with: >> >> Apache Maven 3.0.3 (r10

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.1 (Based on RC1)

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Jörg Schaible > wrote: >> >> As reported, I tested with the Linux version. Anyone else? > > I was on the 586 Linux tar.gz; though it was within a Debian image > inside VirtualBox

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.1 (Based on RC1)

fault locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 > OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.35.14-103.fc14.x86_64", arch: "amd64", > family: "unix" > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Henri Ya

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.1 (Based on RC1)

ang/tags/LANG_3_0/ > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_1/ > > using the same configuration as below.  Do you need me to try Java 1.6 also? > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Can you test trunk, 3.0.1 and 3.0 and see wha

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.1 (Based on RC1)

t find any other problems with the RC either. > > One minor thing: The test jar has the same manifest as the normal jar. This > is probably not a big issue, but a bit inconsistent. > > Oliver > > Am 10.11.2011 08:13, schrieb Henri Yandell: >> >> Post the abortive 3

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.1 (Based on RC1)

What about if you svn export the 3.0.1 tag? ie) I'm interested in whether this is a regression or not. :) Hen On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > James Carman wrote: > >> The following work fine... >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/trunk > > Works fi

Re: [csv] Java 5?

JAXB2 seems to be the item that comes up the most as Java6 dependent. Hen On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:33 PM, James Ring wrote: > I thought there were only a handful of significant changes between java 5 > and 6. Also java 5 has been end-of-lifed since October 2009. > On Nov 10, 2011 7:51 PM, "Emma

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.1 (Based on RC1)

Thanks Jörg. On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Well, building 3.1 with 21 parent (as 3.0.1) let's 3.1 succeed also. > Therefore +1 for 3.1, but I really wonder what triggers this with the 22 > parent and Java 7 on our 64-bit Linux machines.

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.1 (Based on RC1)

+1. Issue found appears related to the 22 parent. Not a blocker for general users (and easy to work around if hit). Hen On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > >  [ ] +1 >  [ ] -1, with reason >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.1 (Based on RC1)

Noting that Lang 3.1 has 3 +1 votes (Oliver's, Jörg's and mine). Planning to call a result tomorrow night and release. Hen On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Am 12.11.2011 00:10, schrieb Henri Yandell: >> >> +1. >> >> Issue found ap

Re: svn commit: r1201740 - in /commons/proper/codec/tags/commons-codec-1.6-RC1: ./ src/changes/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/codec/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/codec/binary/ src/main/java/org

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:41 AM, sebb wrote: > On 14 November 2011 18:34, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 14 November 2011 15:04,   wrote: >>> > Author: ggregory >>> > Date: Mon Nov 14 15:04:32 2011 >>> > New Revision: 1201740 >>> > >>> > URL: http:

[RESULT] Release Commons Lang 3.1 (Based on RC1)

Vote passes with 3 +1s. On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Post the abortive 3.0.2 vote, a first pass at 3.1. I rolled back the > comparators to be > considered/argued about for 3.2. > > RC1 is available here: > >  http://people.apache.org/~bayard

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons Lang 3.1 released

The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Commons Lang 3.1. This is a drop-in replacement for 3.0 and 3.0.1. A list of the 8 changes and 5 bug fixes in this release are found in the release notes: https://commons.apache.org/lang/changes-report.html#a3.1 For general informati

Re: [VOTE][Codec] Release Commons Codec 1.6-RC2

Yeah, that's pretty common. Doing the symlink sleight of hand is a pain in the arse so I assume everyone skips it on the website. Generally I view the RC website as only being there for the project reports; the RM tweaks the site pre release announcement and we don't require voting on website chang

Re: [VOTE][Codec] Release Commons Codec 1.6-RC2

I get the following when I 'mvn clean package': testSpeedCheck(org.apache.commons.codec.language.bm.BeiderMorseEncoderTest): Java heap space My MAVEN_OPTS are: -Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m Not sure if that's expected (2G felt big enough) or if I did something wrong. Otherwise everything

Re: [VOTE][Codec] Release Commons Codec 1.6-RC2

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Matthew Pocock wrote: > Hi Henri, > > > On 23 November 2011 07:14, Henri Yandell wrote: > >> I get the following when I 'mvn clean package': >> >> >>  testSpeedCheck(org.apache.commons.codec.language.bm.Bei

Re: [commons-lang] Add a Triple tuple class analog to the Pair. (#1)

Applied. Scratching my head a bit to see where on the GitHub site you find the link to the .patch file; I hunted for that and ended up using c+p (hadn't seen this email). Good to see that we're getting notified when a pull request comes in :) Hen On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Henning Schmied

LANG-462 [Was: [lang] who's on deck for 3.0.2?]

ed so that it can be used.  This is entirely new > code, with no other class dependent upon it, so there won't be any > backward compatibility issues with Apache code.  Since it implements a JDK > interface, the interface will probably not change. > > chas > > > On 10/3/11

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

I think you just PGP with your release key. Later on we can strengthen the signing by adding you to the web-of-trust. Hen On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:20 PM, William Speirs wrote: > I haven't forgotten about this... been tied up at work with a new employee. > > One potential issue though, I have no

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote: > On 4 December 2011 17:13, William Speirs wrote: >> What is the "rule" on when you can switch Java versions? Is going from > > http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html > >> 1.4 to 1.5 too small of a version number bump to require a different

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 4 December 2011 17:13, William Speirs wrote: >>> What is the "rule" on when you can switch Java versions? Is going from >> >> http://commons.apache.or

Re: [lang] Fix for Apache2,Apache3 StringEscapeUtils/UnicodeEscaper (3 objects created per non-ascii char) & simpler unicode hex logic

Thanks for the report Lawrence. With regards to Sebb's comment, I'm happy to put in a JIRA, but wanted to resolve the attribution comment first: "> Legal: I, Lawrence Angrave (email address, angr...@illinois.edu > ), am the author and copyright holder of the > new co

Fwd: [lang] Fix for Apache2,Apache3 StringEscapeUtils/UnicodeEscaper (3 objects created per non-ascii char) & simpler unicode hex logic

non-ascii char) & simpler unicode hex logic To: Henri Yandell On 3/8/13 12:51 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Thanks for the report Lawrence. > > With regards to Sebb's comment, I'm happy to put in a JIRA, but wanted > to resolve the attribution comment first: > > &

Re: [lang] Fix for Apache2,Apache3 StringEscapeUtils/UnicodeEscaper (3 objects created per non-ascii char) & simpler unicode hex logic

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-877 On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Noting Lawrence's response. I'll get his email's contents added to JIRA :) > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Lawrence Angrave > Date: Fri, Mar 8,

Re: [ALL] Pushing out releases, one component at a time

Bike-shedding can be handled. Someone volunteers to RM a component. They put what they think needs doing for the next release into a list (next JIRA version), and on list we vote on which of the proposed components is top of the heap for a swarm. Especially useful prior to an ApacheCon. Also usefu

Re: [ALL] Pushing out releases, one component at a time

I'd apply two pithy statements here: 1) Activity begets activity. Start working on something and people will be attracted. 2) People don't contribute in a vacuum. You have to leave them work to do. In both cases though, you have to be noticed. People have to see the activity and they have to see

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4

I assume https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-166 is moving to a target of 1.9? On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br> wrote: > +1 (non-binding), all looks good. > > Apache Maven 3.0.4 > Java 1.7.0_09 > Debian 3.2.0-4-amd64 > > Cheers, > > Bruno

Re: [io] readying release?

Because they're low hanging fruit: Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-299 Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-328 Proposed fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-295 Agreed on IO-356. Not sure how critical IO-350 is :) On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:15 PM, sebb

Re: [LANG] Karma on JIRA

I added you. I don't have the admin rights to add you to the commons-developers group, so right now I've just added you to Lang. On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: > Hi guys, > can someone give me karma on JIRA in order to assign to me the issues? > > Thanks > > Maurizio

Re: [io] readying release?

+1 :) Regular cadence is huge. On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > My view is that we do not have to fix or address everything in each > release that is outstanding. In my mind its important to keep the > release trains moving. > > Gary > > On Apr 21,

Re: [io] readying release?

On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 5:27 AM, sebb wrote: > On 21 April 2013 05:44, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > Proposed fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-295 > > > > > I did wonder about using Reflection to solve the issue for Java 7. > > Should we still

Re: [io] readying release?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:33 AM, sebb wrote: > On 22 April 2013 03:41, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 5:27 AM, sebb wrote: > > > > > On 21 April 2013 05:44, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > > > > > > Prop

Re: [ALL] release instructions warning

This fills me with foreboding for doing a release again someday :( On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > To release Codec 1.8, I just tried following > https://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html > > In particular: > > "Before you close< > http://www.apache.org/dev/publishin

Staging site?

Looking at the site building docs, I could see how to modify the site (install a CMS plugin or just modify SVN and test locally, I went with the latter). My commit was then built by the buildbot. Where is the staging site to look at the buildbot output so I can then be happy pressing Publish? I co

Re: Staging site?

So if you're using the SVN approach, you check locally, then commit and go hit publish on the CMS? Hen On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:50 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23 April 2013 19:25, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > Looking at the site building docs, I could see how to modify the site &

Re: Staging site?

Thanks :) Did you mean a different url for your #2 below? That seems to be the url i'm after (the shared directory), but you linked to a page on the Commons site. Hen On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:41 AM, sebb wrote: > On 24 April 2013 05:28, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > So if you

Re: Staging site?

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:38 AM, sebb wrote: > On 24 April 2013 17:53, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > Thanks :) > > > > Did you mean a different url for your #2 below? > > > No. > > > > That seems to be the url > > i'm after (the shared dire

Re: [collections] beta release - howto

Is less attention paid to the API for an alpha/beta? Hen On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > There is nothing special. Even with "alpha", or "beta" as part of the > version number, it is technically an ASF release, and therefore subject to > the full blown process and rul

Re: [jira] [Updated] (CODEC-166) Base64 could be faster

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 31/01/2013 00:35, sebb a écrit : > > The Fix version should only be added when the issue has been fixed, > > and should indicate the release in which the fix is available > > Just noticed this message, the 'Fix version' field can be set

Re: [LANG] LANG-884 - OK to commit patch?

+1 to committing. On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 2:06 AM, sebb wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-884 has a patch to simplify > FastDateFormat which I would like to apply. > > OK? >

Re: Bad link in the javadocs

I'm not sure if metacpan is fine, but it has a working link for the package: https://metacpan.org/source/MSCHWERN/Text-Metaphone-1.96/ Hen On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi Ron, > > Thank you for the report. Can you create a JIRA for this please? Do > you have a fix perc

[LANG] Release Manager?

Anyone available to volunteer to release Lang? I'd love to see releases happening, but I don't have the free time myself :( I tend to have an hour available in the evening when the kids are asleep and that's tough to fit release management into. Hen

Re: [LANG] Release Manager?

al old items that we haven't deemed crucial. Hen On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > I just went through the process for Codec so it painfully fresh in my > mind... Give me an idea of when you'd like to see that happen. > > Gary > > On May 1, 2013, at 3:

Re: Lang: ObjectUtils

I don't see any value having the first two methods - replacing the '==' sign is a bit too far in the 'provide simple methods' direction I think :) I think the third method is already in Lang as: ArrayUtils.contains(array, null); Having a containsNull is semantically nice, but I'm not sure it

Re: svn commit: r1519292 - in /commons/proper/lang/trunk: .gitignore pom.xml src/changes/changes.xml

It'd be hard to argue it's an expressive work imo, thus even with a header there would be nothing licensable. Hen On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Does the .gitignore file need an AL header? > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: > Date: 2013/9/1 > Subjec

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating Project for Release Process Testing...

+1 from me for anything that makes the release process sane. I'd be committing again if preparing a release was simple enough. As it is, I don't have the blocks of time needed to push out a release and committing to projects with no apparent release manager becomes an exercise in futility. Hen

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to Git...

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Never said the opposite but git or svn is not a questioin IMO, both are > simple and usable today. I'm more attracted by features than the infra > around a project. > > For me commons looks like a big sandbox where rules are more importa

Re: Apache Commons IRC Channel...

Plus the IRC channel is the only place you'll get to hear Commons history, Matt's music preference for 7th century heretical works and Emmanuel's business plan for IRC log blackmail. On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:15 AM, James Carman wrote: > As a reminder, we do have an IRC channel set up on freenod

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.2 and beyond

+1 to Java 7, though if that only means a few methods should be removed I'd go with deprecating with a note they'll be removed in Lang 4.0. We should deprecate the time package warning that it will be replaced with a new package based on Java 8's new API in Lang 4.0 :) I'm assuming 4.0 will be Jav

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.2 and beyond

umably for most components if Lang hasn't been fixed. Hen On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > +1 to Java 7, though if that only means a few methods should be removed > I'd go with deprecating with a note they'll be removed in Lang 4.0. > > We shou

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.2 and beyond

Website fixed :) On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > I think this is the priority issue: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-894 > > If we can't fix and deploy our website, having new code is largely > pointless :) > > I'm

Re: Site Builds and Release Votes

On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 13/10/2013 17:35, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > Hi all > > > > in the recent release vote for Compress Gary and I had very different > > opinions on the importance of the site build for release candidates. > > > > On 2013-10-13, Gary Grego

Re: [DISCUSS] Why is releasing such a pain and what can we do to make it easier?

On Tuesday, October 8, 2013, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > one of the points that seem to always come up once in a while is the > process of releasing components. I've never done it myself so I'm asking > people who have done it: I find myself wondering why a release vote is anything more tha

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >