On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:41 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 November 2011 18:34, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 November 2011 15:04,  <ggreg...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> > Author: ggregory
>>> > Date: Mon Nov 14 15:04:32 2011
>>> > New Revision: 1201740
>>> >
>>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1201740&view=rev
>>> > Log:
>>> > Creating commons-codec-1.6-RC1 tag
>>>
>>> I think there was already an RC1 tag.
>>>
>>> Ideally, please don't recreate tags.
>>>
>>
>> I thought we'd gone through this before and decided that it was OK to
>> delete a tag when a vote is not called for that tag.
>
> It's fine to create and drop tags which won't ever be used for a vote.
>
> But tags that are used as RC tags should be immutable.
>
> It's better *never* to reuse an RC tag, as a recreated tag can still
> cause confusion later on.

I'm not understanding the reasoning here. Where is the confusion in a
recreated tag?

It seems far more confusing for me to announce RC12 tomorrow for
Collections and have everyone wonder where the previous 11 were.

Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to