Thank you for the explanation Alex.
I was worried the source was a JDK/JRE or another Java vendor's implementation.
Gary
On 2024/09/12 06:50:12 Alex Herbert wrote:
> It was copied from the same package. The current AbstractLinkedList is
> source incompatible with JDK 21 due to new default method
Hi All,
For the upcoming 2.0.0-M1, I plan on replacing the custom WeakFastHashMap with
the stock ConcurrentHashMap.
If you think this is a bad idea, please tell us why.
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.ap
Hi All,
Any thoughts on the minimum Java platform requirement for 2.0?
Options are (IMO): 8, 11, 17, or 21.
Some perhaps helpful information:
- https://www.azul.com/wp-content/uploads/final-2023-state-of-java-report.pdf
- https://www.jetbrains.com/lp/devecosystem-2023/java/
- https://newrelic.c
I think this is a good idea.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 1:00 PM Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> For the upcoming 2.0.0-M1, I plan on replacing the custom WeakFastHashMap
> with the stock ConcurrentHashMap.
>
> If you think this is a bad idea, please tell us why.
>
> Gary
>
> --
My vote would be for 11 but I am ok with 8 if people feel strongly.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 1:21 PM Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Any thoughts on the minimum Java platform requirement for 2.0?
>
> Options are (IMO): 8, 11, 17, or 21.
>
> Some perhaps helpful information:
>
> -
> https://w
I concur.
-Original Message-
From: Melloware Inc
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 12:25 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open atta
I could live with any of these.
-Original Message-
From: Melloware Inc
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 12:25 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open attachm
