Thank you for the explanation Alex. I was worried the source was a JDK/JRE or another Java vendor's implementation.
Gary On 2024/09/12 06:50:12 Alex Herbert wrote: > It was copied from the same package. The current AbstractLinkedList is > source incompatible with JDK 21 due to new default methods added to > the List interface. So Collections does not compile on JDK 21. Anyone > using the AbstractLinkedList and compiling on JDK 21 must switch their > source to use AbstractLinkedListForJava21. > > If this is not clear from the javadoc and linked issue in the commit > log then we should do a better job explaining this. > > Alex > > On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 21:52, Gary D. Gregory <ggreg...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi All: > > > > Added in 4.5.0-M2, I see a new class called AbstractLinkedListForJava21 > > with the Javadoc: "This is a copy of AbstractLinkedList" > > > > Copied from where? > > What was the license of the source? > > > > If we cannot validate that this is copied from a source file with a > > compatible license, we will have to remove it. > > > > TY! > > Gary > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
