Re: [ALL] Commons Parent - include Animal Sniffer?

Le 14/01/2015 00:57, sebb a écrit : > WDYT? That sounds like a good idea. Is it possible to bind the plugin to the package or deploy phase to avoid slowing the build in compile/test operations? Emmanuel Bourg - To unsubscribe,

Re: [Math] Java version

Hi, My two cents in favour of java 8: IIUC the next major release will break backwards compatibility and aims to clean up the API. Taking a look at the release frequency of commons math [1], it shows releases every 9-12 months (give or take). Given that the next big release is a major one (4.0),

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons Validator 1.4.1 released!

The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Commons Validator 1.4.1. Apache Commons Validator provides the building blocks for both client side validation and server side data validation. It may be used standalone or with a framework like Struts. 1.4.1 is fully binary com

Re: [ALL] Commons Parent - include Animal Sniffer?

2015-01-14 0:57 GMT+01:00 sebb : > I've been experimenting with Animal Sniffer in NET as a basic check > that the code does not try to use method etc which are not present in > the target Java version. > [For example, java.net.IDN requires Java 1.6+] > > Although the plugin is not fool-proof, it s

Re: [MATH] results on H11 using 1.5/6/7

On 14 January 2015 at 00:36, Phil Steitz wrote: > Why only sometimes? > I'm not sure. Is a test run completely deterministic, or can the order of tests vary? i.e. could the JIT see different conditions in different runs and sometimes decide not to optimise away the code? Or is the JIT perhaps af

Re: [ALL] Commons Parent - include Animal Sniffer?

On 14 January 2015 at 01:42, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 6:57 PM, sebb wrote: > >> I've been experimenting with Animal Sniffer in NET as a basic check >> that the code does not try to use method etc which are not present in >> the target Java version. >> [For example, java.net.I

Re: [Math] Java version

On 14 January 2015 at 08:18, Martin Grotle Soukup wrote: > Hi, > > My two cents in favour of java 8: > > IIUC the next major release will break backwards compatibility and aims to > clean up the API. Taking a look at the release frequency of commons math > [1], it shows releases every 9-12 months

Re: [MATH] results on H11 using 1.5/6/7

This may be a good explanation. When I did run the tests, the result was dependent on the number of tests executed. E.g. when only running ComplexTests, no failures were reported. Only when the FastMathTests were also executed. As the FastMathTests do a lot of computations, it is safe to assume t

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons Validator - Apache Commons (Group (shared) Maven 3 Build Definition (Java 1.6))

On 14 January 2015 at 07:48, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2015-01-13 23:11 GMT+01:00 sebb : > >> On 13 January 2015 at 22:02, sebb wrote: >> > Rats! Looks like a bug here: >> > >> > final String authorityASCII = DomainValidator.unicodeToASCII(authority); >> > >> > This is supposed to leave the input

Re: [ALL] Commons Parent - include Animal Sniffer?

I think it would be good to add it by default with the option to disable it on a component level. According to http://mojo.codehaus.org/animal-sniffer-maven-plugin/plugin-info.html, the minimum requirements are JDK 1.5 and maven 2.0, but I wonder if anybody would use an older jdk to build a compon

Re: [Math] Creating reports to be included in the user guide

On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:25:53 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 1/13/15 6:24 PM, Gilles wrote: Hello. Now that we can run the code located in the "src/userguide" directory, I'd propose that some examples be written that produce various reports for inclusion in the user guide. A good starting point w

Jenkins build became unstable: Commons Math #32

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Math] Creating reports to be included in the user guide

On 1/14/15 7:03 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:25:53 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/13/15 6:24 PM, Gilles wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> Now that we can run the code located in the "src/userguide" >>> directory, I'd propose that some examples be written that >>> produce various reports fo

Re: [Math] Java version

On 1/14/15 4:38 AM, sebb wrote: > On 14 January 2015 at 08:18, Martin Grotle Soukup > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> My two cents in favour of java 8: >> >> IIUC the next major release will break backwards compatibility and aims to >> clean up the API. Taking a look at the release frequency of commons math >

Re: [ALL] Commons Parent - include Animal Sniffer?

On 14 January 2015 at 12:16, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > I think it would be good to add it by default with the option to disable it > on a component level. > > According to > http://mojo.codehaus.org/animal-sniffer-maven-plugin/plugin-info.html, the > minimum requirements are JDK 1.5 and maven 2.0,

Re: Updated Commons-RDF

There has been an indirect reply here: https://github.com/commons-rdf/commons-rdf/issues/43, as the issue point to this thread I though to add a back-link but I would prefer to have a discussion here and to discuss about concrete code proposals According to Sergio the proposal is "a wrapper implem

[Math] Add RMS computation in "DescriptiveStatistics"

Hi. Any objection to my adding a "getQuadraticMean()" method in "DescriptiveStatistics" (in package "o.a.c.m.stat")? Regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

[Math] Refactoring "DescriptiveStatistics"

Hi. This class seems a good candidate for using the fluent API which we agreed to use more widely in CM. Having the various stat implementations "final" would allow to get rid of the "synchronized" keywords. I also wonder if some caching mechanism wouldn't be necessary to improve efficiency (the

Re: [Math] Add RMS computation in "DescriptiveStatistics"

On 1/14/15 12:09 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > Any objection to my adding a "getQuadraticMean()" method in > "DescriptiveStatistics" (in package "o.a.c.m.stat")? +1 and can also be added to SummaryStatistics and as an individual moment stat. Phil > ---

Re: [Math] Java version

Converting an example from the user guide using Lambdas (Not an expert so bear with me - And note that the inputArray > inputStream): BEFORE: // Get a DescriptiveStatistics instance DescriptiveStatistics stats = new DescriptiveStatistics(); // Add the data from the array for( int i = 0; i < in

Re: [Math] Java version

Java 8 has only been out for less than a year. There is still a sizable percentage of groups that have not converted up to Java 8 for myriad reasons. While I was surprised that we are requiring backwards compatibility with the ten year old Java 5 I think jumping all the way to requiring Java 8 ma

Re: [Math] Add RMS computation in "DescriptiveStatistics"

On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:36:08 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 1/14/15 12:09 PM, Gilles wrote: Hi. Any objection to my adding a "getQuadraticMean()" method in "DescriptiveStatistics" (in package "o.a.c.m.stat")? +1 and can also be added to SummaryStatistics JIRA issue created. and as an individ

[Math] 3.4 not yet released according to JIRA

Hi. How does one update the status of 3.4 in the current version of JIRA? Regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Math] 3.4 not yet released according to JIRA

On 01/14/2015 11:18 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > How does one update the status of 3.4 in the current version of JIRA? done. You have to switch to the Administration view in JIRA and then navigate to Versions. Thomas - To unsubs

Re: [Math] Java version

I think Rebel Labs or Plumbr have some metrics about JDK usage. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Hank Grabowski wrote: > Java 8 has only been out for less than a year. There is still a sizable > percentage of groups that have not converted up to Java 8 for myriad > reasons. While I was surpri