To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi Elijah!!
nice to hear back from you!
If I recall correctly, we discussed two main topics before cutting the
first Release Candidate:
1) we agreed on dropping the confusing CatalogFactory, or at least
making it more user friendly
2) parser APIs change - there is a prototype patch on CHAIN-76
On 1 October 2012 14:07, Duncan Jones wrote:
> I've now uploaded a complete solution for LANG-637 (see
> commons-lang3-LANG-637-complete.patch in JIRA) and I would very much
> appreciate feedback on the design and implementation. I've already
> factored in comments from James C and Matt B.
>
> I l
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Duncan Jones wrote:
> On 1 October 2012 14:07, Duncan Jones wrote:
> > I've now uploaded a complete solution for LANG-637 (see
> > commons-lang3-LANG-637-complete.patch in JIRA) and I would very much
> > appreciate feedback on the design and implementation. I've
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 October 2012 18:18, wrote:
> > Author: ggregory
> > Date: Sat Oct 13 17:18:56 2012
> > New Revision: 1397903
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1397903&view=rev
> > Log:
> > In-line comment.
> >
> > Modified:
> >
> commons/proper/
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:01 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 15 October 2012 01:57, wrote:
> > Author: ggregory
> > Date: Mon Oct 15 00:57:57 2012
> > New Revision: 1398164
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398164&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Backout: buildnumber-maven-plugin 1.2 -> buildnumber-mav
And now:
[WARNING] The POM for org.codehaus.mojo:buildnumber-maven-plugin:jar:1.2 is
missing, no dependency information available
G
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:01 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 15 October 2012 01:57, wrote:
>> > Author: ggregory
Hi All:
The format object can configure various aspects of input and output
formatting.
With my recent addition of the Quote enum for [CSV-53], there are now two
aspects of quoting to configure: the quote character and the quote policy
(minimal, all, non-numeric, and none.) FYI, 'none' is current
Hi Gary,
Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> The format object can configure various aspects of input and output
> formatting.
>
> With my recent addition of the Quote enum for [CSV-53], there are now two
> aspects of quoting to configure: the quote character and the quote policy
> (minimal, all,
+1 to Jörg, that would be my recommendation as well!
my 0.02 cents,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wro
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > Hi All:
> >
> > The format object can configure various aspects of input and output
> > formatting.
> >
> > With my recent addition of the Quote enum for [CSV-53], there are now two
> > aspects of quotin
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > Hi All:
> >
> > The format object can configure various aspects of input and output
> > formatting.
> >
> > With my recent addition of the Quote enum for [CSV-53], there are now two
> > aspects of quotin
Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> > Hi All:
>> >
>> > The format object can configure various aspects of input and output
>> > formatting.
>> >
>> > With my recent addition of the Quote enum for [CSV-53], th
Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
- "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
system property, might be better represented as "row separator" so as
not to imply that the parameter should be in any way limited to \r or
\n . I would think the defa
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>
> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
> system property, might be better represented as "row separator" so as
> not to imply that the parameter sh
On 16 October 2012 16:29, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>>
>> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
>> system property, might be better represented as "row
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>>
>> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
>> system property, might be better represented
On 16 October 2012 16:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>>> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>>>
>>> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.sep
Matt Benson wrote:
> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>
> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
> system property, might be better represented as "row separator" so as
> not to imply that the parameter should be in any way limited to \r o
On 16 October 2012 12:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
> And now:
>
> [WARNING] The POM for org.codehaus.mojo:buildnumber-maven-plugin:jar:1.2 is
> missing, no dependency information available
Seems to be OK now; CP updated.
> G
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 15
On 16 October 2012 17:08, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>>
>> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
>> system property, might be better represented as "row separator" so as
>> not to imply
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:27 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 17:08, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>>> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>>>
>>> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
>>> system property, might be bette
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> Are these specific examples not the words you would actually use were
> you having a discussion on the subject in English? :P
>
Why not just support both? The "with*" methods would just be aliases
for the more "natural language" method na
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>> Are these specific examples not the words you would actually use were
>> you having a discussion on the subject in English? :P
>>
>
> Why not just support both? The "with*" methods
On 16 October 2012 17:44, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>>
>>> Are these specific examples not the words you would actually use were
>>> you having a discussion on the subject in English? :P
2012/10/16 Stephen Colebourne :
> On 16 October 2012 17:44, Matt Benson wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
Are these specific examples not the words you would actually use were
you having a di
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 16:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Gary Gregory >wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Matt Benson >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
> >>>
>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I did not do this one as is it seems RFC4180 defines CR+LF as the record
> separator as noted in the Javadoc for
> org.apache.commons.csv.CSVFormat.DEFAULT.
>
That's where the name of this component gets confusing to me. Since
it's called
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, James Carman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > I did not do this one as is it seems RFC4180 defines CR+LF as the record
> > separator as noted in the Javadoc for
> > org.apache.commons.csv.CSVFormat.DEFAULT.
> >
>
> That's whe
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, James Carman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > I did not do this one as is it seems RFC4180 defines CR+LF as the record
> > separator as noted in the Javadoc for
> > org.apache.commons.csv.CSVFormat.DEFAULT.
> >
>
> That's whe
Wikipedia has "Delimiter separated text" and "Delimiter-separated values"
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delimiter-separated_values)
This suggests that CsvFormat, Rfc4180Format, and TsvFormat could be final
classes extending DsvFormat.
chas
On 10/16/12 12:50 PM, "Gary Gregory" wrote:
>On Tue, O
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 17:44, Matt Benson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Are these specific examples not the words you would act
2012/10/16 Gary Gregory :
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Stephen Colebourne
> wrote:
>
>> On 16 October 2012 17:44, Matt Benson wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Are these specif
On 16 October 2012 21:56, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2012/10/16 Gary Gregory :
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Stephen Colebourne
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 16 October 2012 17:44, Matt Benson wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:3
On 16 October 2012 21:00, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, James Carman
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I did not do this one as is it seems RFC4180 defines CR+LF as the record
>> > separator as noted in the Javadoc for
>> > o
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:14 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 21:00, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, James Carman <
> ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Gary Gregory
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I did not do this one as is it se
37 matches
Mail list logo
