Am 15.01.2012 20:23, schrieb James Ring:
Google Guava has all this and more, and it doesn't require an extension to
ArrayList, any Iterable will do.
http://google-collections.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/javadoc/com/google/common/collect/Iterables.html
Hi James,
thanks for the response! I agree w
Thank you for the hard work Oliver. The generified API alone is worth a
release IMHO. Other Java 5 features like better synchronization can be
added later.
I think the heavy refactoring can still take place on the experimental
branch, the Java 5 migration is simply no longer one of its main ob
Hi,
looking at the different commons project pages, it occurs to me, that
all pages use a slightly different layout. For example comparing Lang,
BeanUtils and Collections with one another the first thing are the page
titles:
- Home
- BeanUtils - Commons
- Collections - Home
If I were to rat
Am 16.01.2012 12:00, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Am 15.01.2012 20:23, schrieb James Ring:
Google Guava has all this and more, and it doesn't require an
extension to
ArrayList, any Iterable will do.
http://google-collections.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/javadoc/com/google/common/collect/Iterables.html
Hi All,
I'd be interested in getting a version of commons scxml which supports
the latest SCXML standard and would be willing to contribute code to
that effect, work on open tickets, etc..
If you're interested in that, please let me know how I could help best.
FWIW, I've looked over the SCXM
Actually Simone has already brought up a bootstrap'ped variant of the
Commons homepage I liked very much. Not sure what was the problem with
that. We should put it on our table again, as the current Commons site
looks like we are jdk 1.3 users (ok, we support 1.3 on some places,
but this does not m
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Ingo Lütkebohle
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd be interested in getting a version of commons scxml which supports the
> latest SCXML standard and would be willing to contribute code to that
> effect, work on open tickets, etc..
>
Cool :-)
> If you're interested in t
On 16 January 2012 15:02, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Actually Simone has already brought up a bootstrap'ped variant of the
> Commons homepage I liked very much. Not sure what was the problem with
> that.
The major problem was that it did not meet the branding requirements.
> We should put it o
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 January 2012 15:02, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Actually Simone has already brought up a bootstrap'ped variant of the
>> Commons homepage I liked very much. Not sure what was the problem with
>> that.
>
> The major problem was that it did not
Am 16.01.2012 16:16, schrieb sebb:
On 16 January 2012 15:02, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Actually Simone has already brought up a bootstrap'ped variant of the
Commons homepage I liked very much. Not sure what was the problem with
that.
The major problem was that it did not meet the branding re
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> Am 16.01.2012 16:16, schrieb sebb:
>
>> On 16 January 2012 15:02, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually Simone has already brought up a bootstrap'ped variant of the
>>> Commons homepage I liked very much. Not sure what was the proble
I agree, I'm just saying you should seriously study the design of those
interfaces before you embark on a project like this.
Adding a new API to a library like collections imposes a burden on
maintainers that far outweighs the initial cost of the implementation. You
should make sure the API is wor
Hi,
Am Mon 16 Jan 2012 04:10:40 PM CET schrieb Rahul Akolkar:
Sounds reasonable. There hasn't been any time put into bringing the
code upto conformance in over a year. If you're keen to work on some
issues over others, I suggest you simply make a note of that by
commenting on the appropriate tic
Am 16.01.2012 16:40, schrieb Christian Grobmeier:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
Am 16.01.2012 16:16, schrieb sebb:
On 16 January 2012 15:02, Christian Grobmeierwrote:
Actually Simone has already brought up a bootstrap'ped variant of the
Commons homepage I like
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> Am 16.01.2012 16:40, schrieb Christian Grobmeier:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 16.01.2012 16:16, schrieb sebb:
>>>
On 16 January 2012 15:02, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>
>
>
Hi Ingo,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Ingo Lütkebohle
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mon 16 Jan 2012 04:10:40 PM CET schrieb Rahul Akolkar:
>
>> Sounds reasonable. There hasn't been any time put into bringing the
>> code upto conformance in over a year. If you're keen to work on some
>> issues over oth
Also, if you're interested in predicate-based APIs for filtering
Iterables, check out the FilteredIterable class in Commons' unreleased
[functor] component.
Matt
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:50 AM, James Ring wrote:
> I agree, I'm just saying you should seriously study the design of those
> interfa
Am 16.01.2012 17:11, schrieb Matt Benson:
Also, if you're interested in predicate-based APIs for filtering
Iterables, check out the FilteredIterable class in Commons' unreleased
[functor] component.
Matt
I had an interesting discussion about commons collections next release
with Christian Gro
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looking at the different commons project pages, it occurs to me, that all
> pages use a slightly different layout. For example comparing Lang, BeanUtils
> and Collections with one another the first thing are the page titles:
>
> - H
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Jacob Beard wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Ingo Lütkebohle
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am Mon 16 Jan 2012 04:10:40 PM CET schrieb Rahul Akolkar:
>>
>>> Sounds reasonable. There hasn't been any time put into bringing the
>>> code upto conformanc
Hi all guys,
I am here to discuss a possible area to explore for a potential
BeanUtils2 component: I recently came across an article[1] that shows
a fluent API set for Java reflection, with a basic implementation on
gcode[2]; moreover, Alex Ruiz created FEST[3] that is a complete set
of fluent Java
Am 16.01.2012 14:02, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
Thank you for the hard work Oliver. The generified API alone is worth a
release IMHO. Other Java 5 features like better synchronization can be
added later.
I think the heavy refactoring can still take place on the experimental
branch, the Java 5 migra
big +1
If time allows I might be able to code a few lines myself
Cheers
Christian
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I am here to discuss a possible area to explore for a potential
> BeanUtils2 component: I recently came across an article[1] that shows
> a fl
On 14 January 2012 08:42, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:09 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 13 January 2012 06:00, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:52 AM, sebb wrote:
On 12 January 2012 08:27, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:19 AM, sebb wro
On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 16.01.2012 14:02, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
>> Thank you for the hard work Oliver. The generified API alone is worth a
>> release IMHO. Other Java 5 features like better synchronization can be
>> added later.
>>
>> I think the heavy refactorin
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi,
You write for x >= 0, but isn't only x > 0?
Cheers, Mikkel.
Den 17/01/2012 08.12 skrev :
> Author: celestin
> Date: Tue Jan 17 07:12:02 2012
> New Revision: 1232324
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1232324&view=rev
> Log:
> Implementation of log-normal distributions (MATH-733). Patc
Hi Mikkel,
> Hi,
>
> You write for x >= 0, but isn't only x > 0?
>
> Cheers, Mikkel.
>
OK (although the formula does make sense, since the limit exists).
Thanks for pointing that out,
Sébastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
29 matches
Mail list logo
