On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Jacob Beard <jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca> wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Ingo Lütkebohle > <iluet...@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am Mon 16 Jan 2012 04:10:40 PM CET schrieb Rahul Akolkar: >> >>> Sounds reasonable. There hasn't been any time put into bringing the >>> code upto conformance in over a year. If you're keen to work on some >>> issues over others, I suggest you simply make a note of that by >>> commenting on the appropriate ticket in JIRA (and creating a new one >>> if such doesn't exist) and when you feel you have a fix / solution, >>> please attach a patch with appropriate test cases to the JIRA >>> issue(s). >> >> >> Okay. >> >> One question: I was going to start on implementing the "content" child of >> invoke statements and noticed that SCXML-146 has the title <invoke>, without >> further comments though. There are a couple tickets like that, most >> associated with Jacob Beard. Has that work stopped? > > That work was related to my Google Summer of Code 2010 project, > scxml-js. Those tickets were children of the following task: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-120 > This work has now stopped, and these tasks should probably be closed > as "won't fix". I can go ahead and clean this up. > <snip/>
Jake - Yup, such cleanup would be useful, thanks. >> >> Also, are you aware of a specific change-log between the last draft and the >> current draft? I noticed a couple of things that are missing/different, but >> a changelog would make it much easier to check everything. > <snap/> Ingo - Right, we could do better in this area. We have SVN history, release notes and this old changelog [1], but a draft-by-draft status / comparison would be nice indeed. Something to start documenting going forward if there is interest. -Rahul [1] http://commons.apache.org/scxml/changes-report.html > Note that the last time I looked at the Algorithm for SCXML > Intepreteration, it had a serious bug: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2011JanMar/0043.html > It appears they have changed the algorithm since then to support > internal transitions and late binding data, so perhaps this bug has > been fixed in later revisions as well. > > Jake > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org