Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "BuildSystems" page has been changed by ChristianGrobmeier:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems?action=diff&rev1=21&rev2=22
Comment:
ognl supports m2
|| math
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "BuildSystems" page has been changed by ChristianGrobmeier:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems?action=diff&rev1=22&rev2=23
Comment:
updated digester
|| daemon
Hello,
Jelly did not see any activity for nearly two years:
http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?path=%2Fcommons%2Fproper%2Fjelly
Last release was in 01.2010.
We had already discussion on a process to move proper components into
another state, be it "dormant" or "inactive". I would li
On 9 January 2012 06:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:03 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 8 January 2012 21:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Hi All:
>>>
>>> I am pushing out 1.6 and it's time to click release out of Nexus. I
>>> see that there are a ton of files there and the instructions say
On 8 January 2012 20:51, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Could you try maven site too?
I can confirm it works, though I just ran "mvn site", excluding the deploy
phase (for obvious reasons) which I'm pretty sure that is the most critical
due to the use of scp.
Furthermore I don't know if the latter
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
wrote:
> On 8 January 2012 20:51, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Could you try maven site too?
>
> I can confirm it works, though I just ran "mvn site", excluding the deploy
> phase (for obvious reasons) which I'm pretty sure that is the most crit
I think the whole formality of project state should be replaced with a
live activity widget like can be seen on other sites. Commit activity
and such. If someone were thinking of contributing to a project, the
incentive would be removed or seriously diminished by a dead/sleepy
project state.
Gary
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I think the whole formality of project state should be replaced with a
> live activity widget like can be seen on other sites. Commit activity
> and such. If someone were thinking of contributing to a project, the
> incentive would be removed o
On 9 January 2012 14:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I think the whole formality of project state should be replaced with a
> live activity widget like can be seen on other sites. Commit activity
> and such. If someone were thinking of contributing to a project, the
> incentive would be removed or serio
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:35 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 06:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:03 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 8 January 2012 21:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All:
I am pushing out 1.6 and it's time to click release out of Nexus. I
see that th
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:58 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 14:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I think the whole formality of project state should be replaced with a
>> live activity widget like can be seen on other sites. Commit activity
>> and such. If someone were thinking of contributing to a
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I think the whole formality of project state should be replaced with a
>> live activity widget like can be seen on other sites. Commit activity
>> and such. If someone were thinking
+1 and good luck ;-)
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
>
> There is NO change from RC3.
>
> This RC exists because I blew up the Nexus staging repository for RC3
> and a new RC is needed for a clean release process
My +1,
Gary
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
>
> There is NO change from RC3.
>
> This RC exists because I blew up the Nexus staging repository for RC3
> and a new RC is needed for a clean release process.
>
> Th
On 9 January 2012 15:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
>
> There is NO change from RC3.
>
> This RC exists because I blew up the Nexus staging repository for RC3
> and a new RC is needed for a clean release process.
>
> The only changes from 1
On 9 January 2012 15:09, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:35 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 January 2012 06:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:03 PM, sebb wrote:
On 8 January 2012 21:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I am pushing out 1.6 and it's
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> I think the whole formality of project state should be replaced with a
>>> live activity widget like can be seen on other
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:55 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 15:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Good day to you all:
>>
>> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
>>
>> There is NO change from RC3.
>>
>> This RC exists because I blew up the Nexus staging repository for RC3
>> and a new RC is needed
On 9 January 2012 15:17, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:58 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 January 2012 14:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> I think the whole formality of project state should be replaced with a
>>> live activity widget like can be seen on other sites. Commit activity
>>> and
On 9 January 2012 17:04, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I think the whole formality of project state should be replace
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:12 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 15:17, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:58 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 9 January 2012 14:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
I think the whole formality of project state should be replaced with a
live activity widget like
On 9 January 2012 17:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:55 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 January 2012 15:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Good day to you all:
>>>
>>> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
>>>
>>> There is NO change from RC3.
>>>
>>> This RC exists because I blew up the Nex
>>> Project states, if wanted, should be on the Wiki in a list, "this is
>>> how we feel about projects, but a committer can still commit and do
>>> work"
>>
>> That's a separate issue from attracting outside contributions.
>>
>> But I think there are some components that are clearly not going to b
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:26 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 17:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:55 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 9 January 2012 15:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
Good day to you all:
I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
There is NO change fro
On 9 January 2012 18:23, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:26 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 January 2012 17:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:55 AM, sebb wrote:
On 9 January 2012 15:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared
On 9 January 2012 15:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
>
> There is NO change from RC3.
>
> This RC exists because I blew up the Nexus staging repository for RC3
> and a new RC is needed for a clean release process.
>
> The only changes from 1
On Jan 9, 2012, at 15:04, sebb wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 15:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Good day to you all:
>>
>> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
>>
>> There is NO change from RC3.
>>
>> This RC exists because I blew up the Nexus staging repository for RC3
>> and a new RC is needed for a
sebb wrote:
> On 8 January 2012 16:43, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
[snip]
>> The main point for the profile was to suppress the failures of the
>> buildnumber plugin automatically when building from the source tarball.
>
> With RC4, that can be achieved by defining buildNumber.skip=tru
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "BuildSystems" page has been changed by ThomasVandahl:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems?action=diff&rev1=23&rev2=24
Comment:
Added JCS
|| exec|| Yes
On 9 January 2012 15:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
I checked files with the following MD5 hashes:
70a1573d13d76fa3bafe4ee163904e24 commons-pool-1.6-bin.tar.gz
a9b1b1faacbb81282f06e1e502e107d3 commons-pool-1.6-bin.zip
e370c052057cf0b880
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Simone Tripodi wrote:
I did some work on [validator] for the release but did not get through
the issues since I'm not so familiar to [validator] so much... if you
could have a look at them, I can continue providing my help.
Looks like you've done loads, thanks!
I've applied
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:39 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 15:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Good day to you all:
>>
>> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
>
> I checked files with the following MD5 hashes:
>
> 70a1573d13d76fa3bafe4ee163904e24 commons-pool-1.6-bin.tar.gz
> a9b1b1faacbb81282f0
On 10 January 2012 01:25, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:39 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 January 2012 15:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Good day to you all:
>>>
>>> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
>>
>> I checked files with the following MD5 hashes:
>>
>> 70a1573d13d76fa3bafe4ee163
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
+1.
Works with Commons Pool 1.x. For example:
[INFO] --- buildnumber-maven-plugin:1.0:create (default) @ commons-pool ---
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: cmd.exe /X /C "svn --non-interactive info"
[INFO] Working
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:36 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 January 2012 01:25, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:39 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 9 January 2012 15:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
Good day to you all:
I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
>>>
>>> I checked files with the
On 10 January 2012 02:46, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Tue Jan 10 02:46:43 2012
> New Revision: 1229454
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1229454&view=rev
> Log:
> Use svn:keywords Id.
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/pool/branches/POOL_1_X/checkstyle.xml (props changed)
> comm
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
38 matches
Mail list logo
