On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think the whole formality of project state should be replaced with a >> live activity widget like can be seen on other sites. Commit activity >> and such. If someone were thinking of contributing to a project, the >> incentive would be removed or seriously diminished by a dead/sleepy >> project state. > > Interesting idea. > > You mean something like that? > https://www.ohloh.net/p/commons-compress > > Any ideas how we can get this data out from svn? > Probably besides svn an interesting metric is the number of discussion on ml. > > Question is how realistic is it we get something hacked together in > for example ruby?
This is another kind of visualization: http://sourceforge.net/projects/hsqldb/stats/scm?repo=SVNRepository I do not know what the best metric is, just that it would be nice to have /something/. See my other reply to Sebb in this thread. Thank you, Gary > > Cheers > Christian > >> >> Gary >> >> On Jan 9, 2012, at 6:59, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Jelly did not see any activity for nearly two years: >>> http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?path=%2Fcommons%2Fproper%2Fjelly >>> >>> Last release was in 01.2010. >>> >>> We had already discussion on a process to move proper components into >>> another state, be it "dormant" or "inactive". I would like to >>> resurrect this discussion. We have had a lots of discussion in the >>> past: somebody wanted to progress with somehting, like graduating >>> graph or using Java 5 in a component and the response sometimes was we >>> have to less man power at Commons. >>> >>> Therefore I think we need to tell the people for which components they >>> can expect releases and for which ones not. Otherwise outsiders may >>> look at a huge bunch of components and see only little activity. >>> Wouldn't it be better instead to show only a handful components which >>> are actively developed? >>> >>> Looking at Jelly, it is orphaned. No releases, no releases to be >>> expected. I would like to move it to dormant or to a new transition >>> state, if people wish so, maybe called "orphaned" or "inactive" or >>> whatever. >>> >>> What are your thoughts? >>> >>> Cheers >>> Christian >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.grobmeier.de >>> https://www.timeandbill.de >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > https://www.timeandbill.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: http://bit.ly/ECvg0 Spring Batch in Action: http://bit.ly/bqpbCK Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
