[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-12 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz (in module commons-jelly) failed

2011-01-12 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community integratio

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-12 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

LANG - useful to have float/double equals method?

2011-01-12 Thread sebb
Would it be useful to add an equals method for float/double? Commons Math 3.0 has suitable code for doubles in MathUtil. Just wondering whether that should be copied to LANG (and a float version added if necessary)? - To unsubsc

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > I will test the release in the next couple of days, but I have one > comment on the release notes.  Not enough for a -1 by itself, worth > talking about if you roll another RC. > > I like the format and content of the release notes.  I don't mu

Re: LANG - useful to have float/double equals method?

2011-01-12 Thread Julien Aymé
Hi, I think that some part of this already has been discussed on this list (maybe not for equals but for some other code duplication between Commons Lang and Commons Math): the aim of the libraries is not the same, and someone may not want to add a dependency on Commons Math (very specific library

Re: LANG - useful to have float/double equals method?

2011-01-12 Thread Ted Dunning
Why aren't the comparison methods in java (since 1.4) good enough? http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/api/java/lang/Double.html#compare(double, double) http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/api/java/lang/Float.html#compare(float, float) On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:15 AM, sebb wro

Re: [Math] Coding and documenting guidelines

2011-01-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:38 AM, sebb wrote: > > > On 11 January 2011 15:15, Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > Is there a document presenting best practices for writing code for CM? > > > > Sun/Oracle have Javadoc conventions which should be followed. > > > > See > http

Re: LANG - useful to have float/double equals method?

2011-01-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. > Why aren't the comparison methods in java (since 1.4) good enough? > > http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/api/java/lang/Double.html#compare(double, > double) > > http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/api/java/lang/Float.html#compare(float, > float) IIRC, these are not com

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12 January 2011 12:18, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> I will test the release in the next couple of days, but I have one >> comment on the release notes.  Not enough for a -1 by itself, worth >> talking about if you roll another RC. >> >> I like

Re: LANG - useful to have float/double equals method?

2011-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12 January 2011 15:31, Ted Dunning wrote: > Why aren't the comparison methods in java (since 1.4) good enough? 1) LANG 2.x targets 1.3 2) compare does not take into account that floats/doubles are inexact, so some tolerance is needed. See http://www.cygnus-software.com/papers/comparingfloats

Re: LANG - useful to have float/double equals method?

2011-01-12 Thread Henri Yandell
-1 on enhancements in LANG 2.x; by which I mean that I personally am not interested in spending effort on 2.x being anything other than a critical bugfix legacy version. Hen On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:21 AM, sebb wrote: > On 12 January 2011 15:31, Ted Dunning wrote: >> Why aren't the comparison

RE: LANG - useful to have float/double equals method?

2011-01-12 Thread Gary Gregory
> -Original Message- > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 11:29 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: LANG - useful to have float/double equals method? > > -1 on enhancements in LANG 2.x; by which I mean that I personally am > not int

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12 January 2011 01:46, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release. I have back-ported compatible > bug fixes and enhancements from the trunk to the 2.x branch, details > of which are here: > >  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.6-rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >  http://people.

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Gary Gregory
+1. Getting mildly alarming warnings on Maven 3.0.1 but nothing worth killing the RC. [WARNING] [WARNING] Some problems were encountered while building the effective model for commons-lang:commons-lang:jar:2.6 [WARNING] 'build.plugins.plugin.version' for org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-idea-plu

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Jörg Schaible
Gary Gregory wrote: > +1. > > Getting mildly alarming warnings on Maven 3.0.1 but nothing worth killing > the RC. > > [WARNING] > [WARNING] Some problems were encountered while building the effective > [model for commons-lang:commons-lang:jar:2.6 WARNING] > ['build.plugins.plugin.version' for >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 12/01/2011 02:46, Niall Pemberton a écrit : > I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release. I have back-ported compatible > bug fixes and enhancements from the trunk to the 2.x branch, details > of which are here: > > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.6-rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > http://people.ap

Re: [Math] Coding and documenting guidelines

2011-01-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > > Is there a document presenting best practices for writing code for CM? > Right now I'm thinking about the recent overwrites of Javadoc comments; so I > think that it could be useful to lay out what should be there (beyond the > obv

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Oliver Heger
Tested maven build under JDK 1.4 and 1.6 under Windows 7. Artifacts and site look good. I agree that the heading "TASKS IN 2.6" in the release notes is misleading, but this is not a blocker. So +1. Oliver Am 12.01.2011 02:46, schrieb Niall Pemberton: I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release.

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> I will test the release in the next couple of days, but I have one >> comment on the release notes.  Not enough for a -1 by itself, worth >> talking about if you roll another RC. >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Gary Gregory
On Jan 12, 2011, at 16:11, "Niall Pemberton" wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> I will test the release in the next couple of days, but I have one >>> comment on the release notes. Not enough for a -1

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 also from my side, well done Niall!!! :) http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > On Jan 12, 2011, at 16:11, "Niall Pemberton" > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Niall Pemberton >> wrote: >>>

Re: [Math] Coding and documenting guidelines

2011-01-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. > > Is there a document presenting best practices for writing code for CM? > > Right now I'm thinking about the recent overwrites of Javadoc comments; so I > > think that it could be useful to lay out what should be there (beyond the > > obvious that "everything should be documented"). > > Ye

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12 January 2011 21:10, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> I will test the release in the next couple of days, but I have one >>> comment on the release notes.  Not enough for a -1 by it

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Gary Gregory
> -Original Message- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 17:51 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1 > > On 12 January 2011 21:10, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Niall

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release. I have back-ported compatible > bug fixes and enhancements from the trunk to the 2.x branch, details > of which are here: > >  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.6-rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >  http://

Re: [Math] Coding and documenting guidelines

2011-01-12 Thread Ted Dunning
I personally find it more aesthetic and much more expedient to use a standard style guide that many people are already familiar with (more or less, often less). Making up a new style guide is a waste of breath and subject to minor aesthetic quibbles like whether to use a phrase. The Sun guides ar

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:50 PM, sebb wrote: > On 12 January 2011 21:10, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Niall Pemberton >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: I will test the release in the next couple of days, but I have one co

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > On Jan 12, 2011, at 16:11, "Niall Pemberton" > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Niall Pemberton >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: I will test the release in the next couple of days, but

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12 January 2011 23:37, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: >> >> >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 16:11, "Niall Pemberton" >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Niall Pemberton >>> wrote: On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Phil Steitz wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Niall Pemberton
Apologies - I found a small inconsistency in the port of the StringUtils.normalizeSpace() I ported to the 2.x branch. I had to re-write that implementation because the 3.0 trunk uses Java's regexp. It initially trims the string - but that doesn't remove all whitespace characters - so I've switched

Re: [Math] Coding and documenting guidelines

2011-01-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > >> > Is there a document presenting best practices for writing code for CM? >> > Right now I'm thinking about the recent overwrites of Javadoc comments; so >> > I >> > think that it could be useful to lay out what should be there (be

Re: [Math] Coding and documenting guidelines

2011-01-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 03:23:59PM -0800, Ted Dunning wrote: > I personally find it more aesthetic and much more expedient to use a > standard style guide that many people are already familiar with (more or > less, often less). > > Making up a new style guide is a waste of breath and subject to mi

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-collections4 (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-12 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration. Thi