On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > I will test the release in the next couple of days, but I have one > comment on the release notes. Not enough for a -1 by itself, worth > talking about if you roll another RC. > > I like the format and content of the release notes. I don't much like > the heading "TASKS IN 2.6" over the list of resolved issues classified > as "update" in changes.xml, though.
I was trying to separate out changes that didn't actually affect the code from the actual software bug fixes/enhancments. I take your point though and I will fix it in the branch so that if a new RC is required, then it will be fixed. > The text descriptions are taken > from the issue descriptions and refer to the enhancement request, > e.g., "Javadoc is incorrect for lastIndexOf() method" Labeling these > as "tasks" leaves open the interpretation that these are known, > unresolved issues. I think it is better to either just lump them with > the "adds" or use labels like "New Features" (for the adds) and > "Enhancements" or "Updates" for the "updates." I look at re-doing the changes.xml - since the site isn't part of the release and I will be copying the new 2.6 elements over to the trunk's changes.xml if/when the 2.6 release goes out. Niall > Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
