Absolutely. :)
Go ahead and get things started by writing up something for the
transaction website, then we can proceed from there.
I'll come up with a change for the Attributes site.
Hen
2010/4/6 Oliver Zeigermann :
> That sounds reasonable.
>
> I will be off for a week or so, and might need s
--
From: "Henri Yandell"
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 9:18 PM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: Re: Future of Transaction subproject
My method when consensus seems very likely but you want to ensure it's
explicit is to announce you're goi
2010/4/7 Henri Yandell :
> * Tempted to leave the SVN as is, but make it read-only; rather than
> do a move to dormant/. I think we should avoid changing the svn
> location of released components.
Disagree with that point. A committer can be expected to deal with SVN
moves, otherwise he or she wo
On 07/04/2010, Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Tue, 4/6/10, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
> > --- On Tue, 4/6/10, Phil Steitz
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Adrian Crum wrote:
> > > > I just noticed something interesting: it doesn't
> > > matter what I put in the child element of
> > the
> > > element of sett
Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Tue, 4/6/10, Adrian Crum wrote:
>> --- On Tue, 4/6/10, Phil Steitz
>>
>> wrote:
>>> Adrian Crum wrote:
I just noticed something interesting: it doesn't
>>> matter what I put in the child element of
>> the
>>> element of settings.xml - maven still
>> tries
>>> to
On 07/04/2010, bay...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: bayard
> Date: Wed Apr 7 06:09:08 2010
> New Revision: 931440
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931440&view=rev
> Log:
> Moving the @since 2.5 to the correct repeat method
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_5/src/
On 07/04/2010, s...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Wed Apr 7 12:17:25 2010
> New Revision: 931515
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931515&view=rev
> Log:
> Initial version of generic mailing list page.
> Not yet included in navigation links.
>
Generated and uploaded to:
Hi Sebb,
sebb AT ASF wrote at Mittwoch, 7. April 2010 14:42:
> On 07/04/2010, s...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Wed Apr 7 12:17:25 2010
>> New Revision: 931515
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931515&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Initial version of generic mailing list page.
On 07/04/2010, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> sebb AT ASF wrote at Mittwoch, 7. April 2010 14:42:
>
>
> > On 07/04/2010, s...@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: sebb
> >> Date: Wed Apr 7 12:17:25 2010
> >> New Revision: 931515
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931515&vie
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> On 06/04/2010, Bruno Melloni wrote:
>>> Thanks Phil,
>>>
>>> My apologies on the missing [dbcp] prefix. This is the first time I use
>>> the mailing list and I followed the 'mailing lists' link from the DBCP
>>> project witho
--- On Wed, 4/7/10, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Hmmm...Looks like progress. I see that you were
> lacking the commons
> unix group. My bad in setting you up as a
> committer. I just fixed
> that. I am really sorry about this.
It works! Thanks Phil! Could you do the same for Adam please? ID is doogie
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:42 PM, sebb AT ASF wrote:
> On 07/04/2010, s...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Wed Apr 7 12:17:25 2010
>> New Revision: 931515
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931515&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Initial version of generic mailing list page.
>> Not ye
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:31 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 07/04/2010, bay...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: bayard
>> Date: Wed Apr 7 06:09:08 2010
>> New Revision: 931440
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931440&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Moving the @since 2.5 to the correct repeat method
>>
>>
sebb wrote at Mittwoch, 7. April 2010 15:33:
> On 07/04/2010, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Sebb,
>>
>> sebb AT ASF wrote at Mittwoch, 7. April 2010 14:42:
>>
>>
>> > On 07/04/2010, s...@apache.org wrote:
>> >> Author: sebb
>> >> Date: Wed Apr 7 12:17:25 2010
>> >> New Revision: 931515
>>
2010/4/6 ustbcoder :
> Hi Rahul,
>
> Thank you very much, you are a warmhearted guy :-)
>
Well, its also a matter of interest :-)
-Rahul
>
> 2010-04-07
>
>
>
> ustbcoder
>
>
>
> 发件人： Rahul Akolkar
> 发送时间： 2010-04-07 07:50:55
> 收件人： Commons Developers List
> 抄送：
> 主题： Re: [SCXML] GSoC project
On 07/04/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:42 PM, sebb AT ASF wrote:
> > On 07/04/2010, s...@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: sebb
> >> Date: Wed Apr 7 12:17:25 2010
> >> New Revision: 931515
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931515&view=rev
> >> Log
First, thanks for putting this together. Its great to have the docs updated.
While I have not looked at the document in detail, some high-level
comments below ...
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I have made my first attempt at updating the documentation here:
> http://commo
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Adrian Crum wrote:
>>> --- On Sun, 4/4/10, Phil Steitz wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
> The links to the sandbox projects are broken. For
example, the sandbox/convert points t
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> the email is pretty much unreadable
+1, after some threshold, removing content in the reply has more value
than retaining it.
Having read it in gmail helped the cause to some extent.
-Rahul
> but I generated und uploade
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> 2010/4/7 Henri Yandell :
>
>> * Tempted to leave the SVN as is, but make it read-only; rather than
>> do a move to dormant/. I think we should avoid changing the svn
>> location of released components.
>
> Disagree with that point. A committ
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> I've been deleting desirable goals from the docs :)
>
> I think it's more desirable that they be short, sweet and focused;
> than that they cover all possibilities.
>
Ideally:
* half a screen-full's worth recipe on one webpage, no scroll
Here is a sample of the generated output from the new plugin goal:
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/commons/mail-lists.html
This was the manually generated page:
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/commons/mailing-lists.html
I think there are some items in the manually generated page that could
be cop
On 07/04/2010, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I've been deleting desirable goals from the docs :)
> >
> > I think it's more desirable that they be short, sweet and focused;
> > than that they cover all possibilities.
> >
>
>
>
> Id
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of version 2.0.1 of
Commons JEXL.
JEXL is an Expression Language supporting most of the constructs in the JSTL
Expression Language, along with some additional extensions.
As a library, it is intended to facilitate the implementation of d
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> Here is a sample of the generated output from the new plugin goal:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/commons/mail-lists.html
>
> This was the manually generated page:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/commons/mailing-lists.html
>
> I think there are
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:52 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 07/04/2010, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > I've been deleting desirable goals from the docs :)
>> >
>> > I think it's more desirable that they be short, sweet and focused;
>> > t
On 07/04/2010, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> > Here is a sample of the generated output from the new plugin goal:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~sebb/commons/mail-lists.html
> >
> > This was the manually generated page:
> >
> > http://people.apach
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:46 PM, sebb wrote:
> Here is a sample of the generated output from the new plugin goal:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/commons/mail-lists.html
>
> This was the manually generated page:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/commons/mailing-lists.html
>
> I think there are
One last question: How do I make the updated site appear? I still see
the old version.
-Adrian
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Wed, 4/7/10, Phil Steitz wrote:
Hmmm...Looks like progress. I see that you were
lacking the commons
unix group. My bad in setting you up as a
committer. I just fixed
th
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:46 PM, sebb wrote:
> Here is a sample of the generated output from the new plugin goal:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/commons/mail-lists.html
>
> This was the manually generated page:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/commons/mailing-lists.html
I just updated the te
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> One last question: How do I make the updated site appear? I still see the
> old version.
This is an Apache-wide thing - the sites are *syncd* across to the
live site every four hours or so - so it should appear after the next
sync.
Niall
> -A
I still like older 'for example' section. You could put the extra help after
the table perhaps. I think it is very helpful to know about [ALL], [VOTE],
multiple []'s, etc.
Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Seagull Software
email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
email: ggreg...@apache.org
www.se
Note that you can use 140.211.11.10:80 as an *.apache.org/* web proxy
to see your site on p.a.o before it gets synched.
HTH,
Matt
On Apr 7, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Adrian Crum
wrote:
One last question: How do I make the updated site appear?
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:31 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 07/04/2010, bay...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: bayard
>>> Date: Wed Apr 7 06:09:08 2010
>>> New Revision: 931440
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931440&view=rev
>>> Lo
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> I still like older 'for example' section. You could put the extra help after
> the table perhaps. I think it is very helpful to know about [ALL], [VOTE],
> multiple []'s, etc.
The main purpose of that page is for users - I think adding in ot
Point taken. The next question is: Is this information on a developer's page
anywhere?
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 09:28
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [SITE] Commons-Build plugin com
On 07/04/2010, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Point taken. The next question is: Is this information on a developer's page
> anywhere?
>
One solution would be to have the detailed page on the Commons site,
and the individual pages on the component sites.
I'll do a new version with the changes suggested
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jexl has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Thanks all - sorry for that screwup. :(
I had the 2.5 tag checked out to do analysis for the 2.5 article I
wrote. Screwed up and used the wrong directory for this change.
Hen
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>> On
On 07/04/2010, sebb wrote:
> On 07/04/2010, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Point taken. The next question is: Is this information on a developer's
> page anywhere?
> >
>
>
> One solution would be to have the detailed page on the Commons site,
> and the individual pages on the component sites.
>
> I
On 07/04/2010, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Thanks all - sorry for that screwup. :(
>
> I had the 2.5 tag checked out to do analysis for the 2.5 article I
> wrote. Screwed up and used the wrong directory for this change.
At the risk of stating the obvious, it's best to use http: (not
https:) for a re
Is it possible to ask infrastructure to block commits on /tags/* ?
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:46 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 07/04/2010, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Thanks all - sorry for that screwup. :(
>>
>> I had the 2.5 tag checked out to do analysis for the 2.5 article I
>> wrote. Screwed up and used
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 12:43
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [SITE] Commons-Build plugin commons-mail-page
>
> On 07/04/2010, sebb wrote:
> > On 07/04/2010, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > Point taken. The nex
On 07/04/2010, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Is it possible to ask infrastructure to block commits on /tags/* ?
>
The PMC chair can make a directory tree read-only or restrict access
to certain groups of users.
However that would prevent tag creation ... and tags also need to be
deleted, e.g. when an R
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:46 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 07/04/2010, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Thanks all - sorry for that screwup. :(
>>
>> I had the 2.5 tag checked out to do analysis for the 2.5 article I
>> wrote. Screwed up and used the wrong directory for this change.
>
> At the risk of stating th
On 08/04/2010, nia...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: niallp
> Date: Thu Apr 8 01:36:04 2010
> New Revision: 931748
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931748&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove tabs and fix indentation
>
Sorry, did not notice the tabs.
Eclipse XML editor defaults to using tabs - f
On 31/03/2010, sebb wrote:
> Clirr reports:
>
> Parameter 1 of 'public org.apache.commons.net.nntp.Threadable
> thread(org.apache.commons.net.nntp.Threadable[])' has changed its type
> to java.util.List
>
> It looks like this may have been an accidental change; it was
> committed as part of
On 31/03/2010, sebb wrote:
> The fix for NET-276 involved public API changes so is not appropriate
> for a minor release.
>
> NNTPClient#retrieveArticleInfo(int,int)
> was changed to
> NNTPClient#retrieveArticleInfo(long, long)
>
> That can easily be fixed by adding the old method and depreca
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 07/04/2010, sebb wrote:
>> On 07/04/2010, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Point taken. The next question is: Is this information on a developer's
>> page anywhere?
>> >
>>
>>
>> One solution would be to have the detailed page on the Commons site,
>>
It seems we are going back and forth. Shouldn't the other [] conventions be
listed at the end?
In "The Developer list is for questions and discussion related to the
development of Commons Chain. Questions related to the usage of Commons Chain
should be posted to the User list."
Perhaps "Develo
50 matches
Mail list logo
