Hi Donald,
since I was included in the contributors list, I'd like to renew of my
intention in helping you.
My "status" is changed, from ICLA signed to ASF committer (Cocoon3 and
committing to commons-sandbox)
Please let me know whatever I can do to submit the proposal.
Have a nice day,
Simo
http:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Since the proposal discussion on Incubator didn't lead to a conclusion
> on whether this should be an IP Clearance by Commons or a podling for an
> existing project (which is now dormant) I would like your consideration
> of allowing us to upd
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=274020&projectId=538
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 22 Jan 2010 02:48:42 -0800
Finished at: Fri 22 Jan 2010 02:48:54 -0800
Total time: 11s
Build Trigger: Schedule
B
There are a lot of src/test classes that contain a suite() method of the form:
public static Test suite() {
TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(SparseRealVectorTest.class);
suite.setName("SparseRealVector Tests");
return suite;
}
or
public static Test suite() {
sebb wrote:
> There are a lot of src/test classes that contain a suite() method of the form:
>
> public static Test suite() {
> TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(SparseRealVectorTest.class);
> suite.setName("SparseRealVector Tests");
> return suite;
> }
>
> or
>
>
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=274127&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 22 Jan 2010 06:10:29 -0800
Finished at: Fri 22 Jan 2010 06:14:26 -0800
Total time: 3m 57s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
+1
Luc
- "sebb" a écrit :
> There are a lot of src/test classes that contain a suite() method of
> the form:
>
> public static Test suite() {
> TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(SparseRealVectorTest.class);
> suite.setName("SparseRealVector Tests");
> return suite;
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=274154&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Fri 22 Jan 2010 07:35:26 -0800
Finished at: Fri 22 Jan 2010 07:35:50 -0800
Total time: 24s
Build Trigger:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=274155&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Fri 22 Jan 2010 07:40:03 -0800
Finished at: Fri 22 Jan 2010 07:43:11 -0800
Total time: 3m 7s
Build Trigger: Fo
+1
Dim.
There are a lot of src/test classes that contain a suite() method of
the form:
public static Test suite() {
TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(SparseRealVectorTest.class);
suite.setName("SparseRealVector Tests");
return suite;
}
or
public static Test
Dear Community.
I've just been going through all the continuous distributions in the
MATH-library to check which implemented the HasDensity-interface.
Only the F-distribution, t-distribution, Weibull distribution, and
Cauchy distribution didn't implement it, and with MATH-330
(https://issues.apac
I think you mean double density(double x)
I think that it makes a lot of sense. If necessary, something like
AbstractContinuousDistribution could implement a default that throws
UnimplementedOperationException.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
> This means that now
I've now implemented this idea: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-332
I haven't closed MATH-330 and MATH-331 because they can still be used
if this MATH-332 is rejected.
2010/1/22 Ted Dunning :
> I think you mean double density(double x)
>
> I think that it makes a lot of sense. If nece
--
From: "sebb"
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:21 AM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: [MATH] Remove unnecessary suite() methods from test classes?
There are a lot of src/test classes that contain a suite() method of the
form:
publi
14 matches
Mail list logo
