Re: [lang] Lang package name change. Was: [(LANG-561) unescapeHtml has been dropped without going through deprecation]

2009-12-10 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Paul Benedict wrote at Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2009 20:16: > >> I hope to see org.apache.commons:commons-lang:3.0 > > No, not if it is no longer backwards compatible to 2.0 APIs. 2.0 is: commons-lang:commons-lang:3.0. So it'll be a change of

Re: [math] getting changes included into commons-math (was Re: Home for the colt fork)

2009-12-10 Thread Phil Steitz
Ted Dunning wrote: > Similarly, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-310 had code from a > contributor and got totally shot down basically with "We don't care what you > think, we don't want it". Extensive attempts on my part to find common > ground just got shot down by Phil with -1 and ess

Re: [dbcp] 1.3/1.4 RC1 available for review

2009-12-10 Thread Phil Steitz
Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Phil Steitz wrote: > >> I have prepared release candidates for DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. Please all >> interested parties have a look and test. If all goes well, I will >> kick off a release VOTE based on these artifacts in the next couple >> of days. I see these as

Re: [lang] Lang package name change. Was: [(LANG-561) unescapeHtml has been dropped without going through deprecation]

2009-12-10 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Paul Benedict wrote at Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2009 20:16: >> >>> I hope to see org.apache.commons:commons-lang:3.0 >> >> No, not if it is no longer backwards compatible to 2.0 APIs. >

Re: [lang] Lang package name change. Was: [(LANG-561) unescapeHtml has been dropped without going through deprecation]

2009-12-10 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >>> Paul Benedict wrote at Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2009 20:16: >>> I hope to see org.apache.commons:commons-lang:3.0 >>> >

Re: [jira] Closed: (LANG-392) Improve javadoc samples

2009-12-10 Thread sebb
On 10/12/2009, Henri Yandell (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > ] > > Henri Yandell closed LANG-392. > -- > >Resolution: Fixed > Fix Version/s:

Re: [jira] Closed: (LANG-392) Improve javadoc samples

2009-12-10 Thread Henri Yandell
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:04 AM, sebb wrote: > On 10/12/2009, Henri Yandell (JIRA) wrote: >> >>      [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel >> ] >> >>  Henri Yandell closed LANG-392. >>  -

Re: [math] getting changes included into commons-math (was Re: Home for the colt fork)

2009-12-10 Thread Henri Yandell
Btw, useful link that shows you the patches (or at least attachments) you currently have on open tickets: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ConfigureReport.jspa?versionId=-1&issueStatus=open&selectedProjectId=12310485&reportKey=com.sourcelabs.jira.plugin.report.contributions%3Acontributionrepo

Re: [math] getting changes included into commons-math (was Re: Home for the colt fork)

2009-12-10 Thread Phil Steitz
Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Jake Mannix a écrit : >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Benson Margulies >> wrote: >> >>> This is interesting. We have a raft of mathematically qualified >>> committers on Mahout, and this message asking for help on >>> commons-math, and a raft of code marooned at mahout t

Re: [math] getting changes included into commons-math (was Re: Home for the colt fork)

2009-12-10 Thread Phil Steitz
Jake Mannix wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Benson Margulies > wrote: > >> This is interesting. We have a raft of mathematically qualified >> committers on Mahout, and this message asking for help on >> commons-math, and a raft of code marooned at mahout that wants to be >> in commons m

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-12-10 Thread Donald Woods
OK, I'll kick-off the discussion later today. -Donald Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Sorry guys. Guess using my Yahoo mail and Thunderbird for list subscriptions was a bad idea I've been seeing other posts to the d...@commons list and direct

Re: svn commit: r889313 - in /commons/proper/jexl/trunk: pom.xml xdocs/index.xml

2009-12-10 Thread sebb
On 10/12/2009, hen...@apache.org wrote: > Author: henrib > Date: Thu Dec 10 16:30:31 2009 > New Revision: 889313 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=889313&view=rev > Log: > documentation fixes; bsf beta3 as dependency Why have you reverted to BSF beta3? > Modified: > commons/pro

Re: svn commit: r889313 - in /commons/proper/jexl/trunk: pom.xml xdocs/index.xml

2009-12-10 Thread henrib
Because 'mvn site' fails otherwise; the repo seems to only publish beta{1,2,3}. This occurred on the 2 environments I'm using (Mac & WinXP). sebb-2-2 wrote: > > ... > Why have you reverted to BSF beta3? > ... > -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r889313-in-c

Re: [JEXL] bsf-api dependency version (was: svn commit: r889313 ...)

2009-12-10 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:03 PM, henrib wrote: > > Because 'mvn site' fails otherwise; the repo seems to only publish > beta{1,2,3}. > This occurred on the 2 environments I'm using (Mac & WinXP). > Right, the build will fail since 3.0 isn't in the m2 repos [1, 2]. I remembered a related discuss

Re: svn commit: r889313 - in /commons/proper/jexl/trunk: pom.xml xdocs/index.xml

2009-12-10 Thread sebb
On 10/12/2009, henrib wrote: > > Because 'mvn site' fails otherwise; the repo seems to only publish > beta{1,2,3}. > This occurred on the 2 environments I'm using (Mac & WinXP). > I see. I think we need to wait until this is sorted (hopefully only a few days). > sebb-2-2 wrote: > > > > ...

where is dbcp-1.4RC1 repository?

2009-12-10 Thread tommy wang
hi all: I need run dbcp-1.4RC1 by maven in OSGi envirement. Please tell me where I can get it. what is dbcp-1.4 release schedule? thanks!

Re: where is dbcp-1.4RC1 repository?

2009-12-10 Thread Jörg Schaible
tommy wang wrote at Freitag, 11. Dezember 2009 06:17: > hi all: > I need run dbcp-1.4RC1 by maven in OSGi envirement. Please tell me > where > I can get it. It's not an official release, therefore it's not publicly available anywhere. You can build it from the tagged source if you really

Re: [dbcp] 1.3/1.4 RC1 available for review

2009-12-10 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote at Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2009 12:42: > Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Hi Phil, >> >> Phil Steitz wrote: >> >>> I have prepared release candidates for DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. Please all >>> interested parties have a look and test. If all goes well, I will >>> kick off a releas