On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Niall Pemberton <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Henri Yandell <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Paul Benedict wrote at Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2009 20:16: >>> >>>> I hope to see org.apache.commons:commons-lang:3.0 >>> >>> No, not if it is no longer backwards compatible to 2.0 APIs. >> >> 2.0 is: commons-lang:commons-lang:3.0. >> >> So it'll be a change of groupId and you could put both in the same pom >> without issues (afaik). > > Maven and how its organised is irrelevant - its what you need in your > classpath that matters and if you have different dependencies > requiring different versions that are incompatible then you're in > trouble if they share the same package names.
Doh, forget this, had a brain fart. I agree :) Niall > Niall > >> Hen > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
