On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Paul Benedict wrote at Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2009 20:16:
>>
>>> I hope to see org.apache.commons:commons-lang:3.0
>>
>> No, not if it is no longer backwards compatible to 2.0 APIs.
>
> 2.0 is:  commons-lang:commons-lang:3.0.
>
> So it'll be a change of groupId and you could put both in the same pom
> without issues (afaik).

Maven and how its organised is irrelevant - its what you need in your
classpath that matters and if you have different dependencies
requiring different versions that are incompatible then you're in
trouble if they share the same package names.

Niall

> Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to