Sorry guys. Guess using my Yahoo mail and Thunderbird for list
subscriptions was a bad idea I've been seeing other posts to the
d...@commons list and directly to me, but none about this thread until
today for some reason
Niall, let me know if you need any help collecting the source t
They were all sitting in the spam folder in Yahoo mail. Sorry for that.
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
Sorry guys. Guess using my Yahoo mail and Thunderbird for list
subscriptions was a bad idea I've been seeing other posts to the
d...@commons list and directly to me, but none about this
On Dec 8, 2009, at 7:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I have prepared release candidates for DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. Please all
>> interested parties have a look and test. If all goes well, I will
>> kick off a release VOTE based on these artifacts in the next couple
>> of days. I s
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Sorry guys. Guess using my Yahoo mail and Thunderbird for list
> subscriptions was a bad idea I've been seeing other posts to the
> d...@commons list and directly to me, but none about this thread until today
> for some reason
>
> Ni
Guys,
following the list over Gmane it is not even possible to post to the issues
list ...
- Jörg
sebb wrote at Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2009 16:18:
> Fine by me too.
>
> If the package name change is agreed then I'm happy to close LANG-561.
>
> Also, we probably ought to make 2.x the 'default
On 2009-12-09, sebb wrote:
> Also, we probably ought to make 2.x the 'default' Gump project for
> LANG, so other projects have to deliberately choose lang-3.
I'd assume the Maven groupId would change as well, so any projects
building with mvn will only ever see one of either. For Ant and Maven
Ted Dunning a écrit :
> Actually, the reason that we have Colt in Mahout is it has proven impossible
> to get changes into commons math. We really, really wanted to use commons
> math rather than have our own linear algebra package, but it just proved
> impossible and we didn't want to wait foreve
So, the silence is rather noisy in response to the discussion about
commons-math. Commons PMC members, what's the story here? Why is it
apparently easy for me to tee up code for primitives and impossible
for the corresponding activity for -math?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
stackoverflow.com is accepting free filler adds from open source
things. Should this group come up with an add for asf-via-mentoring?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: de
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> stackoverflow.com is accepting free filler adds from open source
> things. Should this group come up with an add for asf-via-mentoring?
This group? No. Anything we do there would need to go through the PRC:
http://www.apache.org/press/
This is interesting. We have a raft of mathematically qualified
committers on Mahout, and this message asking for help on
commons-math, and a raft of code marooned at mahout that wants to be
in commons math. If I were one of those mathematically competant
individuals, I'd be off attaching a patch o
I hope to see org.apache.commons:commons-lang:3.0
Paul
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2009-12-09, sebb wrote:
>
>> Also, we probably ought to make 2.x the 'default' Gump project for
>> LANG, so other projects have to deliberately choose lang-3.
>
> I'd assume the Ma
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> This is interesting. We have a raft of mathematically qualified
> committers on Mahout, and this message asking for help on
> commons-math, and a raft of code marooned at mahout that wants to be
> in commons math. If I were one of those ma
Similarly, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-310 had code from a
contributor and got totally shot down basically with "We don't care what you
think, we don't want it". Extensive attempts on my part to find common
ground just got shot down by Phil with -1 and essentially no more discussion
I don't want to denigrate the large contributions of Phil and Luc
(especially Luc), but I have drawn a stronger conclusion that it isn't worth
my time to contribute to commons-math because interesting changes likely
won't get accepted.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> Ted an
Jake Mannix a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> This is interesting. We have a raft of mathematically qualified
>> committers on Mahout, and this message asking for help on
>> commons-math, and a raft of code marooned at mahout that wants to be
>> in common
Hi Benson,
I would assume that contributing to commons-math requires some good math
background whereas primitives seem a little bit easier ... :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Benson Margulies wrote:
> So, the silence is rather noisy in response to the discussion about
> commons-math. Commons PMC
I can see how everyone ends up with a headache here.
As the person who threw the most recent rock into the lake, let me
re-present the situation as I got into it.
CERN Colt is a library with a mixture of 'category A' material and
'category B-or-worse' material. In other words, it is not an
attrac
Yes, of course. I'm not qualified to do much for Math, but Ted and
others at Mahout are.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> I would assume that contributing to commons-math requires some good math
> background whereas primitives seem a little bit easier ...
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> >
> > I have submitted patches for the following tickets: MATH-312 (and
> acceptance
> > of that patch blocks my patch for MATH-314), MATH-316 and MATH-317, none
> > of which have appear to have had much progress on. All of my patches
> come
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> CERN Colt is a library with a mixture of 'category A' material and
> 'category B-or-worse' material. In other words, it is not an
> attractive dependency for ASF code as a lump.
>
Yep, that's why when I made my original patch of Colt for
There are some things I don't like about this, but will try to find the time
to fix them myself . Comments inline (and I can't veto anything in [math],
so these are just suggestions).
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 2:56 PM
Subject: svn commit: r88
Hey Bill,
I'm glad you looked at this! You point out something which is really
weird - as my comment in the JIRA ticket indicates, I believe I removed any
allowing of nonzero default values, for exactly the reasons you brought up
(in short, they're a total pain to deal with), and many more:
"N
Paul Benedict wrote at Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2009 20:16:
> I hope to see org.apache.commons:commons-lang:3.0
No, not if it is no longer backwards compatible to 2.0 APIs.
- Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons
26 matches
Mail list logo
