On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr>wrote:
> > > > I have submitted patches for the following tickets: MATH-312 (and > acceptance > > of that patch blocks my patch for MATH-314), MATH-316 and MATH-317, none > > of which have appear to have had much progress on. All of my patches > come > > with unit tests for new functionality. > > I had these patches in my backlog and considered them accepted. I should > have commited them before, sorry for that. I'll take care of them right > now. > > > > > On the other hand, when I opened the discussion about extending the > > functions > > package to enable composable functions (MATH-313), I got an entirely > hostile > > response, which only tempered as far as "+0" on adding it after > discussion. > > The discussion was not entirely hostile as we get some intermediate > consensus at some points. I understand your feelings after several > patches that did not get committed fast enough. > > Please accept my apologizes for this. > Luc, looking back over that thread, I should say that no, it was not entirely hostile - and we did come to more of a consensus later on (although even that consensus was given a very lukewarm +0 from Phil). I apologize for any implication that I was being treated poorly or unfairly. It just seems that as Benson says later, that the rate of change of c-math and mahout are rather different, and this discussion around those JIRA tickets simply highlighted what this understanding was. -jake
