Guys, following the list over Gmane it is not even possible to post to the issues list ...
- Jörg sebb wrote at Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2009 16:18: > Fine by me too. > > If the package name change is agreed then I'm happy to close LANG-561. > > Also, we probably ought to make 2.x the 'default' Gump project for > LANG, so other projects have to deliberately choose lang-3. > > On 09/12/2009, Paul Benedict > <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: >> After thoughtful deliberation, I also favor lang3 package change. My >> reasoning is so that migration is not an all-or-nothing for users. They >> can use both lang < 3 and lang 3 simultaneously and transition overtime. >> >> Paul >> >> >> On 12/9/2009 2:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> >> > Sorry - forgot the marker. >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Henri >> > Yandell<flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Perhaps now is the right time to do the package change? >> > > >> > > Does anyone have a better idea than: >> > > >> > > org.apache.commons.lang -> org.apache.commons.lang3? >> > > >> > > That kind of sets us up for lang 4.0 needing a package change as >> > > well, but I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. >> > > >> > > Hen >> > > >> > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Niall Pemberton >> > > (JIRA)<j...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > > [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787657#action_12787657 >> ] >> > > > >> > > > Niall Pemberton commented on LANG-561: >> > > > -------------------------------------- >> > > > >> > > > Presumably there is going to be a package name change before Lang >> > > > 3.0 >> is released? If so everything breaks. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
