Hi,
I want to invoke a command in a remote machine using RSh(remote shell) from my
java app, so I'm trying out the examples.rshell class in commons-net-1.4.1.
The only way it succeeded was running the Java app from linux(as root) to
linux, but my app will not be run as root, and I must invoke a
What exactly are you having trouble with? What is "not working on
linux"? What behavior are you seeing? Are you getting an exception?
If so, can you provide a stack trace, please.
Also, some might consider it rude to append your message with
"solution to this. I am in urgent need" (especially
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:37 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What exactly are you having trouble with? What is "not working on
> linux"? What behavior are you seeing? Are you getting an exception?
> If so, can you provide a stack trace, please.
Venkar does state that he is seeing
Hi folks,
according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
commons-exec to commons proper?!
The current state of the commons-exec
(http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
+) I made my first bug fix i
What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of
Solaris 10 on a machine at home yesterday. I might be able to run the
test there, assuming the test suite runs okay.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> according to http:
Hi James,
that was quick ... :-)
+) any Solaris version would do
+) the standalone tests suite is here :
http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/download/commons-exec/
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
James Carman wrote:
What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of
Solaris 10 on
We also have a zone (Solaris on intel) that can be used to test it.
2008/6/13 James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of
> Solaris 10 on a machine at home yesterday. I might be able to run the
> test there, assuming the test suite runs
Well, the machine I setup was an Intel-based machine (pentium 4 I
believe), just for playing around with Solaris. This seems like a
quick way to get started playing with Solaris! :) It's got JDK1.5 on
it right now I believe. I'll try to run the tests tonight when I get
home. Or, you could use
My results:
Time: 49.106
OK (55 tests)
-bash-3.00$ uname -a
SunOS maven.zones.apache.org 5.10 Generic_127128-11 i86pc i386 i86pc
Thanks for all your work on this!
Cheers,
Brett
2008/6/14 Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi James,
>
> that was quick ... :-)
>
> +) any Solaris version w
For stuff like MapUtils and StringUtils, I'd probably place a comment
in there that these are not intended to be part of the public API and
could change without warning.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> according to http://wiki.apache.or
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>
> The current state of the
--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Update: Luckily pquerna was available on
> #asfinfra
> > and retrieved the production site from www before
> it
> > got synched with the new content. I couldn't get
>
Thanks to anyone who reported issues with the previous
two release candidates, and especially to those who
helped resolve them.
The artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc3/
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jxpath/tags/JXPATH_1_3_RC3/
Site:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Tom Schindl schrieb:
I can feel your pain. Thank god I'm using OSGi and can declare my
dependencies explicitly :-)
Yep. Well, it works for those libs that are just internal implementation
details.
I'm not an OSGi expert, but if any exported class contains a
On 13/06/2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to anyone who reported issues with the previous
> two release candidates, and especially to those who
> helped resolve them.
>
> The artifacts are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc3/
.asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 sho
Thanks for your attention, Sebastian.
--- sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13/06/2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Thanks to anyone who reported issues with the
> previous
> > two release candidates, and especially to those
> who
> > helped resolve them.
> >
> > The artifa
Siegfried Goeschl a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
> commons-exec to commons proper?!
I would be very happy to see Exec promoted and released.
Luc
>
> The curren
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 20:19 +0200, Nacho Gonzalez Mac Dowell wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
> > Tom Schindl schrieb:
> >
> >> I can feel your pain. Thank god I'm using OSGi and can declare my
> >> dependencies explicitly :-)
> >>
> >
> > Yep. Well, it works for those libs that are ju
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Siegfried Goeschl a écrit :
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
>> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
>> commons-exec to commons proper?
On 6/12/08, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > You need to use the "rc" profile when building a
> > release candidate.
> > The default profile shouldn't be updating the site.
> > We should have to
> > turn on a "release" profile
On 6/13/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: sgoeschl
> Date: Fri Jun 13 05:34:14 2008
> New Revision: 667505
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667505&view=rev
> Log:
> Updating the FAQ
>
> Modified:
> commons/sandbox/exec/trunk/src/site/fml/faq.fml
>
> Modi
--- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/12/08, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
>
> > >
> > > You need to use the "rc" profile when building
> a
> > > release candidate.
> > > The default profile shouldn't be upda
On 6/13/08, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the notes, my condolences on the jet lag,
:-)
> and my apologies if I sounded like I was attacking you
> personally; I certainly wasn't.
>
Bah, no, it didn't come across that way either.
-Rahul
---
On 6/13/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have other components with only one active person so IMO its not a
> blocker. For me I would hope there is an intention on your part to
> stick around and support it - I'm not looking for any kind of promise,
> since none of us know
Artifacts look good to me and I tested on JDK 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6
so +1 from me
Niall
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to anyone who reported issues with the previous
> two release candidates, and especially to those who
> helped resolve them.
>
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:19:22 +0200, simon wrote:
> The second part of the "jar hell" problem is dependencies which *are*
> exported as part of a bundle's public API.
>
> For example, a bundle exports a class with this API:
> public boolean isInRange(
> org.apache.lang.math.DoubleRange range
26 matches
Mail list logo
