What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of Solaris 10 on a machine at home yesterday. I might be able to run the test there, assuming the test suite runs okay.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN > there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving > commons-exec to commons proper?! > > The current state of the commons-exec > (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/) > > +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have the > karma to mess up the project ... :-) > +) I officially took over the code in November 2007 > +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression > tests > +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs > +) removed commons-logging dependency > +) added a few more features plus regression tests > +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on various > platforms and JVMs (see > http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html) > +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008 > +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user > community > +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year > > The not so good things > > +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on OpenVMS > - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical > +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code > > Thanks in advance > > Siegfried Goeschl > > PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available > .... > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
