Hi, Christian.
Thanks for you opinion, advice and interest.
> At least you'll have to invest some time. If you start you better take
a long breath and learn to be patient :-)
Yes, I see. However, I am concerned about it.
> The API you proposed itself looks interesting - can you explain t
Hi,
> however, I am worrying about I don`t have 'commit authority' when
> it goes to sandbox.
> So, I`d like to know how to obtain 'commit authority' when it goes to
> sandbox. Is it possible?
here are two interesting links for you:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html
http://common
--- On Sun, 3/22/09, Min Cha wrote:
> From: Min Cha
> Subject: Re: Robust-Task introduction
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Cc: "incubator-general"
> Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 12:49 AM
> Hi, Matt.
> Thanks for your interest and opinion.
&
o, the exit criteria for a podling into Commons are
> less than
> clear. With this in mind myself and Henri Yandell quite some time ago
> worked up a proposal for a Commons mini-incubator but received little
> (actually "no" IIRC) feedback.
>
> Food for thought anyway.
for thought anyway.
-Matt
--- On Sat, 3/21/09, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> From: Niclas Hedhman
> Subject: Re: Robust-Task introduction
> To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: dev@commons.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, March 21, 2009, 4:23 AM
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:04
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Min Cha wrote:
> I wonder whether I am understanding a message from you.
> Do you think this project should or can be a component in Commons?
Could become...
> If so, I would like to know how to be a component in Commons.
Well, it depends. The Commons communit
Thanks for your very nice answer. That makes the difference clear.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Min Cha wrote:
> Hi. ted.
> Thanks for your question.
>
> ...
> First, Robust-Task is based on DSL(Domain Specific Langueage). It makes
> code
> more READABLE. You can compare with the code styl
Hi. ted.
Thanks for your question.
In general, MQ is using to send messages among distribued servers in
enterprise environment.
I think that workflow you mentioned is workflow on the viewpoint of
integration.
On the other hands, Robust-Task handles general worlflow on one process or
one marchine.
How is this different from things like OpenMQ (from Sun) or ActiveMQ
(apache)?
These do workflow pretty well.d
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Min Cha wrote:
> Hi, Niclas.
> Thanks for your opinion.
>
> I wonder whether I am understanding a message from you.
> Do you think this project should
I think this is a neat thing that Commons might pick up on, as I see a
problem of it to be large enough for its own community.
Cheers
Niclas
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Min Cha wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I am developing a framework called as Robust-Task.
> Robust-Task is a framework which helps
Hi, Niclas.
Thanks for your opinion.
I wonder whether I am understanding a message from you.
Do you think this project should or can be a component in Commons?
If so, I would like to know how to be a component in Commons.
IMHO, Robust-Task has a possibility to be a good contributor to Java and
A
Hi, all.
I am developing a framework called as Robust-Task.
Robust-Task is a framework which helps you write READABLE code when you need
to express complex or long business flow.
(Recently, 0.1 concept version was released.)
I would like to see that the idea of Robust-Task is valuable through the
12 matches
Mail list logo
