Thank you for cutting the RC Benedikt.
While the Clirr breakage for FastDateFormat is documented as intentional
and 'safe' in the release notes, the first place I looked for information
is the Javadoc, IMO the same information from the release notes could be
duplicated in the Javadoc. The Javadoc
2013/12/23 Oliver Heger
> Am 23.12.2013 10:26, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> > Hello Oilver,
> >
> > thanks for your review and the suggestions.
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/22 Oliver Heger
> >
> >> Hi Benedikt,
> >>
> >> the release notes mention that Lang 3.0 and onwards requires Java 5,
> >> while the 3.
Am 23.12.2013 10:26, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> Hello Oilver,
>
> thanks for your review and the suggestions.
>
>
> 2013/12/22 Oliver Heger
>
>> Hi Benedikt,
>>
>> the release notes mention that Lang 3.0 and onwards requires Java 5,
>> while the 3.2 release actually needs Java 6. I think this
For my $0.02 I'd say that if the Javadocs are usable it doesn't really
matter. :|
Matt
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Duncan Jones wrote:
> On 23 Dec 2013 18:32, "Matt Benson" wrote:
> >
> > Bene pointed out to me that he did build w/ Java 7; of course the target
> > setting in the POM is
On 23 Dec 2013 18:32, "Matt Benson" wrote:
>
> Bene pointed out to me that he did build w/ Java 7; of course the target
> setting in the POM is the reason the classfiles are Java 6 compatible,
> which is the important thing in any case.
Presumably that means the Javadocs have a Java 7 style? Is t
Bene pointed out to me that he did build w/ Java 7; of course the target
setting in the POM is the reason the classfiles are Java 6 compatible,
which is the important thing in any case.
Matt
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> - RAT report looks okay.
> - I successfully buil
- RAT report looks okay.
- I successfully build the contents of the source artifacts with both Java
6 and Java 7
- I successfully build the contents of the tag
- britter code signing key is in
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/KEYS
- All sigs and hashes check out
- Binary jars appe
Hi Jörg,
2013/12/23 Jörg Schaible
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't know what it is, but for me the download of
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/source/commons-lang3-3.2-src.tar.gzalways
> stops at 71% ... anyone else ?!?
>
Don't know, works on my machine. I'm using Safari on Mac OS
Hi,
I don't know what it is, but for me the download of
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/source/commons-lang3-3.2-src.tar.gz
always stops at 71% ... anyone else ?!?
- Jörg
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant en
Hello Oilver,
thanks for your review and the suggestions.
2013/12/22 Oliver Heger
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> the release notes mention that Lang 3.0 and onwards requires Java 5,
> while the 3.2 release actually needs Java 6. I think this has to be
> explicitly stated.
>
Oh, yes! Would probably be bet
Hi Benedikt,
the release notes mention that Lang 3.0 and onwards requires Java 5,
while the 3.2 release actually needs Java 6. I think this has to be
explicitly stated.
Otherwise, everything looks good. Build runs successful with Java 1.7 on
Windows 8.1. Artifacts and site look good; the release
11 matches
Mail list logo
