For my $0.02 I'd say that if the Javadocs are usable it doesn't really matter. :|
Matt On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Duncan Jones <dun...@wortharead.com>wrote: > On 23 Dec 2013 18:32, "Matt Benson" <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Bene pointed out to me that he did build w/ Java 7; of course the target > > setting in the POM is the reason the classfiles are Java 6 compatible, > > which is the important thing in any case. > > Presumably that means the Javadocs have a Java 7 style? Is that a problem > or do we produce the website Javadocs in a different process? > > Duncan > > > > > Matt > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > - RAT report looks okay. > > > - I successfully build the contents of the source artifacts with both > Java > > > 6 and Java 7 > > > - I successfully build the contents of the tag > > > - britter code signing key is in > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/KEYS > > > - All sigs and hashes check out > > > - Binary jars appear to have been built using Java 6 > > > - All LICENSE and NOTICE files appear to be where they should > > > > > > +1 to release from me. > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org > >wrote: > > > > > >> Hello All, > > >> > > >> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > > >> since Commons Lang 3.1 was released, so I would like to release > Commons > > >> Lang 3.2. > > >> > > >> Commons Lang 3.2 RC1 is available for review here: > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/ (svn > revision > > >> 3964) > > >> > > >> Maven artifacts are here: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-014/org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.2/ > > >> > > >> Details of changes since 3.1 are in the release notes: > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > > >> > > >> > > >> > > http://people.apache.org/~britter/commons-lang3/3.2-RC1/site/changes-report.html > > >> > > >> The tag is here: > > >> > > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_2_RC1/(svn > > >> 1552978) > > >> > > >> Site: > > >> http://people.apache.org/~britter/commons-lang3/3.2-RC1/site/ > > >> (note some *relative* links are broken and the 1.2 directories are > not > > >> yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed. > > >> Also note, that PMD shows a lot of warnings due to useless > parenthesis. > > >> We have decided to leave these in the code for readability. > > >> Findbugs has a few warnings, none of which we consider to be > dangerous, > > >> but as always: patches are welcome ;-) > > >> > > >> Clirr Report (compared to 3.1): > > >> > > >> > > >> > > http://people.apache.org/~britter/commons-lang3/3.2-RC1/site/clirr-report.html > > >> (note that the Clirr report show 3 errors. This changes are > considered > > >> to > > >> be save for client code. More Information about this can be found in > the > > >> release notes) > > >> > > >> RAT Report: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > http://people.apache.org/~britter/commons-lang3/3.2-RC1/site/rat-report.html > > >> > > >> KEYS: > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > > >> > > >> Please review the release candidate and vote. > > >> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after > > >> December 25 2013 at 12:30 CET > > >> > > >> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > > >> [ ] +0 OK, but... > > >> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > > >> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> > > >> Benedikt > > >> > > >> -- > > >> http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > > >> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > > >> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > > >> http://github.com/britter > > >> > > > > > > >
