On 23 Dec 2013 18:32, "Matt Benson" <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Bene pointed out to me that he did build w/ Java 7; of course the target > setting in the POM is the reason the classfiles are Java 6 compatible, > which is the important thing in any case.
Presumably that means the Javadocs have a Java 7 style? Is that a problem or do we produce the website Javadocs in a different process? Duncan > > Matt > > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > - RAT report looks okay. > > - I successfully build the contents of the source artifacts with both Java > > 6 and Java 7 > > - I successfully build the contents of the tag > > - britter code signing key is in > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/KEYS > > - All sigs and hashes check out > > - Binary jars appear to have been built using Java 6 > > - All LICENSE and NOTICE files appear to be where they should > > > > +1 to release from me. > > > > Matt > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org >wrote: > > > >> Hello All, > >> > >> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > >> since Commons Lang 3.1 was released, so I would like to release Commons > >> Lang 3.2. > >> > >> Commons Lang 3.2 RC1 is available for review here: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/ (svn revision > >> 3964) > >> > >> Maven artifacts are here: > >> > >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-014/org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.2/ > >> > >> Details of changes since 3.1 are in the release notes: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > >> > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~britter/commons-lang3/3.2-RC1/site/changes-report.html > >> > >> The tag is here: > >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_2_RC1/(svn > >> 1552978) > >> > >> Site: > >> http://people.apache.org/~britter/commons-lang3/3.2-RC1/site/ > >> (note some *relative* links are broken and the 1.2 directories are not > >> yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed. > >> Also note, that PMD shows a lot of warnings due to useless parenthesis. > >> We have decided to leave these in the code for readability. > >> Findbugs has a few warnings, none of which we consider to be dangerous, > >> but as always: patches are welcome ;-) > >> > >> Clirr Report (compared to 3.1): > >> > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~britter/commons-lang3/3.2-RC1/site/clirr-report.html > >> (note that the Clirr report show 3 errors. This changes are considered > >> to > >> be save for client code. More Information about this can be found in the > >> release notes) > >> > >> RAT Report: > >> > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~britter/commons-lang3/3.2-RC1/site/rat-report.html > >> > >> KEYS: > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > >> > >> Please review the release candidate and vote. > >> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after > >> December 25 2013 at 12:30 CET > >> > >> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > >> [ ] +0 OK, but... > >> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > >> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Benedikt > >> > >> -- > >> http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > >> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > >> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > >> http://github.com/britter > >> > > > >
