Yeah, let me boot up my Solaris 8 box ;)
Hen
On Dec 3, 2007 10:15 AM, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Point taken :)
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2007 10:12 AM, Christoph Kutzinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That's not entirely true
> >
> > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/download.html
> > "On So
>
> --- Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Another issue is that Sun has end-of-lifed JDK 1.3.
> > It doesn't make sense to
> > me to continue to support a platform even Sun has
> > given up on.
>
Since all contributions are on a volunteer-basis, if somebody really wants
it fixed for 1.
--- Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another issue is that Sun has end-of-lifed JDK 1.3.
> It doesn't make sense to
> me to continue to support a platform even Sun has
> given up on.
I know what it's like to work in slow-adoption shops.
My current shop is just _about_ to move from 1.4
Point taken :)
On Dec 3, 2007 10:12 AM, Christoph Kutzinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's not entirely true
>
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/download.html
> "On Solaris 8 - J2SE 1.3.1 is continuing in the Sun End of Life (EOL)
> process. The EOL transition period began Oct 25, 2004 and will
That's not entirely true
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/download.html
"On Solaris 8 - J2SE 1.3.1 is continuing in the Sun End of Life (EOL) process.
The EOL transition period began Oct 25, 2004 and will continue until the the
end of the Solaris 8 five year Vintage Support Period."
;-)
> Another
Another issue is that Sun has end-of-lifed JDK 1.3. It doesn't make sense to
me to continue to support a platform even Sun has given up on.
On Dec 3, 2007 7:26 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We've three 1.3 specific compile time pro
--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've three 1.3 specific compile time problems. Do
> we move to 1.4, or
> just fix these?
>
> Two currently in SVN:
>
> [javac]
>
/Users/hen/apache/commons-proper/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/text/ExtendedMessageFormat.java:356:
> Messa
1.5 + new package!
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> My preference is to keep this release and branch of [lang] as 1.3
> compatible, primarily as part of the purpose of [lang] is to
> fill in JDK
> holes for old JDKs.
>
> I would then suggest that [lang] switches to Java 5, in a new package.
>
> Steph
1.5+ time!
On Dec 2, 2007 1:45 AM, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My preference is to keep this release and branch of [lang] as 1.3
> compatible, primarily as part of the purpose of [lang] is to fill in JDK
> holes for old JDKs.
>
> I would then suggest that [lang] switches to Jav
My preference is to keep this release and branch of [lang] as 1.3
compatible, primarily as part of the purpose of [lang] is to fill in JDK
holes for old JDKs.
I would then suggest that [lang] switches to Java 5, in a new package.
Stephen
Henri Yandell wrote:
We've three 1.3 specific compile
1.4 time!
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 8:21 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [lang] 1.3 problems
>
> We've three 1.3 specific compile time problems. Do we move to 1.4, or
> just fix these?
>
> Two
1.4 time.
On Dec 1, 2007 8:20 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've three 1.3 specific compile time problems. Do we move to 1.4, or
> just fix these?
>
> Two currently in SVN:
>
>[javac]
> /Users/hen/apache/commons-proper/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/text/ExtendedMessa
12 matches
Mail list logo
