+1 for Java 8 as well. Unless there is a compelling feature in Java 11+
that could make a difference for beanutils from a user point of view.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 25/09/2024 à 21:45, Josh Fenlason a écrit :
While some might have some preferences on more recent Java versions, I haven't
seen any
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2024 5:21 AM
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0
> >
> >
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
> > links or open attachments u
settle on Java 8 so this isn't an
> impediment to getting a new BeanUtils 2.0 release out the door?
> Josh.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Xeno Amess
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2024 5:21 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaf
the door?
Josh.
-Original Message-
From: Xeno Amess
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2024 5:21 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the
each version under which spring using be OK
> >
> > From: Richard Zowalla
> > Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 12:59:15 PM
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0
> >
> > My 2 cents are: BeanUtils is often used i
9:15 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0
>
> My 2 cents are: BeanUtils is often used in the EE ecosystem EE 9.1 targets
> 8/11, EE 10 targets 11/17, EE 11 targets 17 or higher.
>
> People are still doing the EE8 to 9.1/10 move
for 90%+ normal user each version under which spring using be OK
From: Richard Zowalla
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 12:59:15 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0
My 2 cents are: BeanUtils is often used in the EE
My 2 cents are: BeanUtils is often used in the EE ecosystem EE 9.1 targets
8/11, EE 10 targets 11/17, EE 11 targets 17 or higher.
People are still doing the EE8 to 9.1/10 move (thanks to the name change). So
perhaps 11 or 17 would be a good fit for a baseline version.
Gruß
Richard
Am 14. Sep
On Fri, 13 Sept 2024 at 22:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> The age does not really matter Elric, it's the percentage of people using a
> platform. See the links in my previous email. I think the highest we can go
> is 17, but that's just me.
According to the 3rd link, Java version usage in 2024 is
7
The age does not really matter Elric, it's the percentage of people using a
platform. See the links in my previous email. I think the highest we can go
is 17, but that's just me.
Gary
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024, 4:11 PM Elric wrote:
> On 12/09/2024 19:21, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > An
On 12/09/2024 19:21, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
Hi All,
Any thoughts on the minimum Java platform requirement for 2.0?
Options are (IMO): 8, 11, 17, or 21.
I have no vote, but I would go for 21. This will likely be a decision
that will have an impact for a long time. 21 is 1 year old, 17 is 3
y
I could live with any of these.
-Original Message-
From: Melloware Inc
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 12:25 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open
My vote would be for 11 but I am ok with 8 if people feel strongly.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 1:21 PM Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Any thoughts on the minimum Java platform requirement for 2.0?
>
> Options are (IMO): 8, 11, 17, or 21.
>
> Some perhaps helpful information:
>
> -
> https://w
13 matches
Mail list logo
