RE: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

2016-03-25 Thread Gilles
problem; I see that the sentence could be misunderstood. ;-) Regards, Gilles -Original Message- From: Gilles [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 1:48 AM To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1 On Thu, 24 Ma

RE: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

2016-03-24 Thread Roger Whitcomb
g.homelinux.org] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 1:48 AM To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1 On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 04:51:21 +, Roger Whitcomb wrote: > I believe the necessity of having 3 PMC votes for a release is an > Apache-wide requireme

RE: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

2016-03-24 Thread Gilles
less stringent requirements upon the voters (e.g. looking at the the "diff"). Gilles ~Roger Whitcomb -Original Message- From: Gilles [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 8:43 AM To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release

Re: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

2016-03-23 Thread Gary Gregory
ing" these requirements for any reason. > > ~Roger Whitcomb > > -Original Message- > From: Gilles [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org] > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 8:43 AM > To: dev@commons.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1 >

RE: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

2016-03-23 Thread Roger Whitcomb
re is any provision for "relaxing" these requirements for any reason. ~Roger Whitcomb -Original Message- From: Gilles [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 8:43 AM To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.

Re: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

2016-03-21 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 21/03/2016 16:42, Gilles a écrit : > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:29:48 -0400, Evan Ward wrote: >> On 03/21/2016 09:18 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Le 21/03/2016 13:44, Evan Ward a écrit : The vote passes with three votes in favor and none against. >>> Well, in fact I am not sure it passes yet ..

Re: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

2016-03-21 Thread Gilles
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:29:48 -0400, Evan Ward wrote: On 03/21/2016 09:18 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 21/03/2016 13:44, Evan Ward a écrit : The vote passes with three votes in favor and none against. Well, in fact I am not sure it passes yet ... As far as I know, there are only 2 PMC members w

Re: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

2016-03-21 Thread Evan Ward
On 03/21/2016 09:18 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 21/03/2016 13:44, Evan Ward a écrit : >> The vote passes with three votes in favor and none against. > Well, in fact I am not sure it passes yet ... > > As far as I know, there are only 2 PMC members who voted: Oliver and myself. Oh, I didn't real

Re: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

2016-03-21 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 21/03/2016 13:44, Evan Ward a écrit : > The vote passes with three votes in favor and none against. Well, in fact I am not sure it passes yet ... As far as I know, there are only 2 PMC members who voted: Oliver and myself. Could a third PMC member look at it? best regards, Luc > > Thanks f