Martin Cooper a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I would strongly protest against such a move.
>
>
> I wasn't proposing such a move, merely speculating.
>
>
>> Commons are used outside
>> of the ASF and are successful there. I even think [
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Viraj Turakhia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> If I have read it right, I do agree with the point that we need to give
> committers access to people more freely.
>
Definitly.Primetime developing for Commons is no fun. It's a bit frustrating.
Maybe there should be some
If I have read it right, I do agree with the point that we need to give
committers access to people more freely.
Suggested solution of having a separate development branch sounds good to me
(don't know how feasible it is).
-v
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would strongly protest against such a move.
I wasn't proposing such a move, merely speculating.
> Commons are used outside
> of the ASF and are successful there. I even think [math] is used almost
> only outside of AS
On 11/9/08, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > For example, one of the reasons people don't want to bring things to
> > Commo
Martin Cooper a écrit :
> Interesting post. Allow me to do some thinking out loud of my own. ;-)
>
> IMHO, in its earlier days, Commons worked well in that quite a few projects
> did "donate" parts of their code bases to Commons, thus seeding it and
> enhancing the commonality between those projec
On 09/11/2008, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > For example, one of the reasons people don't want to bring things to
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For example, one of the reasons people don't want to bring things to
> Commons
> > any more is because they have to buy in to the entire Commo
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example, one of the reasons people don't want to bring things to Commons
> any more is because they have to buy in to the entire Commons enchilada.
> Consistent build systems, consistent web sites, consistent release cr
Interesting post. Allow me to do some thinking out loud of my own. ;-)
IMHO, in its earlier days, Commons worked well in that quite a few projects
did "donate" parts of their code bases to Commons, thus seeding it and
enhancing the commonality between those projects and promoting sharing
beyond th
Apologies for writing this as a blog rather than an email - it felt
more natural and will pull in other opinions:
http://blog.generationjava.com/roller/bayard/entry/the-open-and-federated-commons
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E
11 matches
Mail list logo
