Hi,
2010/9/29 Gilles Sadowski :
>> >> Just to be sure: You propose to remove
>> >> public void setDistribution(TDistribution value)
>> >> Is this correct?
>> >
>> > Yes.
>> >
>> >> If so, another proposal - I'm not sure it's a clever one - is
>> >>
>> >> ---CUT---
>> >> public TDistribution se
> >> Just to be sure: You propose to remove
> >> public void setDistribution(TDistribution value)
> >> Is this correct?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> >> If so, another proposal - I'm not sure it's a clever one - is
> >>
> >> ---CUT---
> >> public TDistribution setDistribution(TDistribution value) {
> >>
Hi,
2010/9/29 Gilles Sadowski :
>> Just to be sure: You propose to remove
>> public void setDistribution(TDistribution value)
>> Is this correct?
>
> Yes.
>
>> If so, another proposal - I'm not sure it's a clever one - is
>>
>> ---CUT---
>> public TDistribution setDistribution(TDistribution va
> Just to be sure: You propose to remove
> public void setDistribution(TDistribution value)
> Is this correct?
Yes.
> If so, another proposal - I'm not sure it's a clever one - is
>
> ---CUT---
> public TDistribution setDistribution(TDistribution value) {
> double n = value.getDegree
Hi,
Just to be sure: You propose to remove
public void setDistribution(TDistribution value)
Is this correct?
If so, another proposal - I'm not sure it's a clever one - is
---CUT---
public TDistribution setDistribution(TDistribution value) {
double n = value.getDegreesOfFreedom();
Hi.
While making the distribution classes immutable, I'm encountering a problem.
In class "SimpleRegression" (package "stat.regression"), there is (at line
140):
---CUT---
if (n > 2) {
distribution.setDegreesOfFreedom(n - 2);
}
---CUT---
and, similarly, in class "TTestI
